Yes I received the documents.

First I want to point out that the reason for privately providing was to protect your identity as well as making certain that the testing agent was not wrongfully accused.

The news article from The Post & Courier (Charlotte, SC) has already exposed his drug testing credentials.

As relates to the documents provided:

1. These are not the laboratory forms. They are his forms and require corroboration by the laboratory. Furthermore, the results as shown therein are initial screening only with no record of a confirmation test even for the single positive noted.
2. These forms contain several obvious errors, most notably time(s) of test(s).
3. His affidavit states that you tested positive by GC/MS/MS in confirmation of the Positive noted on his form. There is nothing to support that claim.
4. I ran his name through the MRO registries and he is not an MRO. In fact he lacks the basic qualification. He is not a medical doctor and is not licensed to practice medicine.
5. I also checked his claim of being a Forensic Toxicologist. He is not accredited through any of the current professional bodies.

There is no need to further expand on those items as they are fully and completed addressed in the article noted above.

His statement that the amount of Tramadol found in your leg hair was higher than it should be is without scientific support.

Nonetheless you are now placed in the position of disproving his reckless statements.

Welcome to the wonderful world of unregulated commercial drug testing.

Finally, I ran a search on the other doctor that you mentioned and she is a medical doctor and certified MRO. She should be able to clear this up in short order. Hope that works out well for you.

Reference

G. Smith, Questions surround methods, credentials of drug screener, Post & Courier, Charlotte, SC, Sun, Jul 30, 2006