Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
    DrJ's Avatar
    DrJ Posts: 1,328, Reputation: 339
    Ultra Member

    Aug 22, 2006, 02:22 PM
    rearrange this formula to solve for n (no, its not my homework lol)
    p = x*(1 - (1+r)^-n)/r

    In words: take the negative nth power of (1+r). Subtract from 1,
    divide by r. This gives the ratio of p to x.

    I need to be able to solve for n.

    Can someone help me with creating a formula out of this to solve for n? :confused:
    DrJ's Avatar
    DrJ Posts: 1,328, Reputation: 339
    Ultra Member

    Aug 22, 2006, 04:08 PM
    C'mon... I know there are some mathematical genius's out there... and I don't want to fall off the new posts page :cool:
    worthbeads's Avatar
    worthbeads Posts: 538, Reputation: 45
    Senior Member

    Aug 22, 2006, 05:16 PM
    this one's a tough one. I'm not exactly sure about the answer, but if it helps, I think p=-x, but I would check that if I were you.
    DrJ's Avatar
    DrJ Posts: 1,328, Reputation: 339
    Ultra Member

    Aug 22, 2006, 06:02 PM
    Well, here's what I came up with:

    dmatos's Avatar
    dmatos Posts: 204, Reputation: 26
    Full Member

    Aug 22, 2006, 06:27 PM
    You have to use logarithms to "undo" powers. This is what I get:

    n = ln(1-rp/x)/ln(1+r)

    Where ln is the natural logarithm. A logarithm in any base would work, as long as you used the same top and bottom, but because of the special features of log(base e), ln is often used for this type of thing.
    rudi_in's Avatar
    rudi_in Posts: 251, Reputation: 45
    Full Member

    Aug 22, 2006, 06:47 PM
    I agree that you will have to use logs to solve this one.

    A quick verification on the calculator to show that this does work could be as follows...

    2ⁿ = 8

    n = (log 8) (log 2)


    n = (ln 8) (ln 2)

    n = 3
    DaveS002's Avatar
    DaveS002 Posts: 2, Reputation: 1
    New Member

    Oct 28, 2006, 06:32 AM
    Mathcad gives the following solution: -ln(-(p*r-x)/x)/ln(1+r).

    Of course p, r, and x will have to be in proper bounds in order to take the ln.


Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions


Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.

Check out some similar questions!

Solve [(86400*n^2)/2^n]<1 solve n [ 3 Answers ]

Could you Please solve this problem <1 solve n

Speed formula help [ 6 Answers ]

OK I am taking my first physics class and I am not doing too great in it, but the good thing is this is only the first week of class. My question is about the speed formula. I know that the formula is S=D/T, but I still get the problems wrong even thow I plug in the numbers right. Here is an...

Difference in the Formula calulation [ 3 Answers ]

I am a software engineer. We are creating an efficiency report of employees. we have two reports detail and summary of efficiency of employees. while calculating detail report we are picking up each jobcard done by an employee . Following is the example formula applied is as follows ...

View more questions Search