Absent from the comments coming out of the White House lately is all the $$$$ that is being collected from tariffs . Why ? Because it aint happening .......not from foreign nations anyway.
Instead we are getting rhetoric that sounds like it came out of Clueless Joe's regime.
In a statement to ABC News, White House spokesperson Kush Desai said, "Americans may face a
transition period from tariffs," but insisted "the cost of tariffs will ultimately be borne by foreign exporters."
As new tariffs take effect, US consumers footing more than half the burden: Report - ABC News
hmmm inflations is transitional .When did we hear that before ?
Analysts are saying consumers and American companies are bearing the bulk of the costs ;and the White House is not denying it .
US consumers will likely shoulder 55% of tariff costs by the end of the year, with American companies taking on 22%, the Goldman analysts wrote in an Oct. 12 research note to clients. Foreign exporters would absorb 18% of tariff costs by cutting prices for goods, while 5% would be evaded, they wrote.
How the United States is eating Trump's tariffs
Trump is digging in on the issue.
Trump Enacts Tariffs on Imported Lumber and Furniture - The New York Times
Having already severely damaged US farmers who grow soy beans ; Trump late yesterday threatened tariffs on Chinese cooking oil ( that won't affect me . The only oil I use for cooking is olive ) . But imports of Chinese cooking oil is already almost non-existent. What China did was stop importing soy beans from the US . They now get them from Argentina (a nation who's economy Trump plans to prop up with a bailout ) .
The way I see it ;it will be hard for the Dems to screw up the mid-term elections even with all the success Trump is having in foreign policy .
2 things can save the Repubs hides and both come from SCOTUS
Before the end of the year they will make rulings on the constitutionality of Trump's tariffs ;and on the issue of racial preferences for voting districts .
They should decide that his tariffs are unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court Should Limit Trump’s Tariff Power | Cato Institute
If they decide that districts drawn with deference to racial preferences is unconstitutional the Repubs will pick up a significant number of seats .......maybe
In 'monumental' voting rights case, Supreme Court weighs use of race in redistricting - ABC News
Repubs could gain up to 19 seats .
Why maybe ? It should be a sure thing . But the coming mid-term election will be about the economy .
The average cost of a new car tops $50,000 for the first time ever | CNN Business
Trump tariffs help fuel biggest grocery price hike since 2022
And all of this would be worse except he has done a great job with US energy production .
At the retail level is where American voters will judge for themselves if his policies are effective . No one believed that inflation was transitory during Clueless Joe's regime. I don't believe many Americans are buying it now.