Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #1

    Dec 28, 2024, 06:42 AM
    The taking clause aka the "Just Compensation " Clause
    The relevant part of the 5th amendment reads "nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation" .


    I first started commenting about it here in 2008 when SCOTUS passed the ridiculous Kelo vs New London decision. The City of New London took over private property ;not to build roads ,parks or other things usually considered "public use" . They transferred the property to a private interest because it was part of the city's master plan for redevelopment. SCOTUS ruled that the city's plan qualified as "public use"

    Does the majority rule in the USA?

    I called it a terrible decision then and still believe it today.
    Under the plan the area would be redeveloped revitalizing the city ;create a thousand jobs ;bring tax revenue yada yada . NONE OF THAT HAPPENED .

    (if you want to watch a movie of Susette Kilo's battle to save her home watch 'Little Pink House ')

    SCOTUS will have a chance to revisit this horrible decision.

    NY is the battlefield
    Mohawk Valley Health System built a hospital in Utica NY . That set up an eminent domain fight.

    A developer purchased a plumbing company's property and planned to convert it to office space near a hospital. But another developer has a different plan .They want to use it for parking for a medical office they are building near the hospital.
    The State Court of Appeals has ruled that the Oneida County Industrial Development Agency has the right to take the building from Bowers Development, through eminent domain.

    That scenario has the property ultimately going to Central Utica Builders for parking for the new medical office building they built across from Wynn Hospital, and that just opened on Monday.
    Is the Legal Battle Over the Former O'Brien Plumbing Building Over? | Health | wktv.com
    So they are permitted according to the State to take private land from one developer and give it to a competitor .
    This case is making it's way through the court system I think SCOTUS should ultimately take the case and use it as an opportunity to repeal Kilo

Check out some similar questions!

Conflicting ...The 5th Amendment "taking clause "and the use of the 'police powers " [ 0 Answers ]

Police power is an inherent power of the state to exercise reasonable control over persons and property within its jurisdiction in the interest of the general security, health, safety, morals, and welfare except where legally prohibited. In the US it is covered by the 10th amendment. The taking...

Collector's Guild LTD, NY- "original etching" "Pour Roby" Picasso "Star Scene" J Moro [ 0 Answers ]

Both pictures have stickers on the back stating with a "certification seal" that the Picasso is a original etching and the Joan Miro is a lithograph. Moro looks real to me but I can't take the frames off to feel if the paint is real or maybe I don't know what a lithograph should feel like just a...

Difference between "compensation of students" and " Allowances" [ 7 Answers ]

Is there any difference between "US compensation of students" and "amounts received From U.S. Sources to provide ordinary living expenses"? Treaty treaty between the US and C.I.S. Countries says that certain "amounts received from U.S. Sources to provide ordinary living expenses" are exempt...

"Form" placed in "Microsoft Access" can be accessed from a "Button" in "VB.Net" App [ 1 Answers ]

Hi All, Actually, I'm not very well in programming but a task is assigned to me related to .Net. Basically, there is a database in Microsoft Access. I have made forms in it which are based on queries to retrieve required results. I have also made graph of it. Now, I have to merge this...

What does an "Option to lease" clause in a lease mean? [ 2 Answers ]

I have an office which is leased to a person with lots of money and subleases the property. His lease is about to end in Oct of 2008, but has the option to lease it for five more years. He has not paid in a timely fashion and has even waited three months before he makes payment on those three...


View more questions Search
 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.