Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #21

    May 9, 2011, 02:25 PM
    You think these nutjobs represent "the left'. In the same way that we should think the Westboto Baptist Church represent all Christians.
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #22

    May 9, 2011, 03:18 PM
    So the tree huggers are loose again what we say down here is they have a kangaroo loose in the top paddock. There is no way the kangaroos are going to get the right to carry a gun.
    smoothy's Avatar
    smoothy Posts: 25,492, Reputation: 2853
    Uber Member
     
    #23

    May 10, 2011, 05:00 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    You think these nutjobs represent "the left'. In the same way that we should think the Westboto Baptist Church represent all Christians.
    The difference here is nobody has given the Westboro church a license to do what they want and force everyone to do their bidding. THey do have that same freedom of speech the left was so fond of when Cindy Shehan was spewing her crap.

    The Left HAS given the EPA free reign to operate outside the boundaries of the law or oversight. And that is an important distinction between those two.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #24

    May 10, 2011, 05:06 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    You think these nutjobs represent "the left'. In the same way that we should think the Westboto Baptist Church represent all Christians.
    I mentioned Van Jones is largely behind this, a guy appointed by Obama as his green jobs czar. I'd say that makes him a leader one way or another. No one gives the Phelps any credibility but themselves.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #25

    May 10, 2011, 05:10 AM

    Yes ,these 'nutjobs' represent the highest levels of our government . The EPA was given broad ,almost dictatory discretion on the environment ;and Van Jones was a key White House environmental czar until his crazy rhetoric became too over the top even for the Obots.
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #26

    May 10, 2011, 05:25 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    yes ,these 'nutjobs' represent the highest levels of our government .
    No they don't. It's people who have a website. They aren't senators or governors: ExecuThe Executive Committee for Global Alliance for the Rights of Nature | Rights of Nature
    How are they "the highest levels of our government"?
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #27

    May 10, 2011, 05:39 AM

    Don't know what you linked to. What I saw on the OP was the official EPA site.
    Create a New Climate For Action - Rap
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #28

    May 10, 2011, 05:44 AM
    I linked to the website in the post speech made which kicked off this discussion: Ask Me Help Desk - View Single Post - Latest weapon in the war on climate change. That's the nutjobs I was referring to.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #29

    May 10, 2011, 05:49 AM

    And as we already mentioned Van Jones represents 'mainstream' left thinking and only resigned (not fired) after his rhetoric was exposed .
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #30

    May 10, 2011, 05:51 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    Van Jones represents 'mainstream' left thinking
    I think that the sooner you understand that no one person represents a whole group you'll understand things better. Try to think of people as individuals not groups.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #31

    May 10, 2011, 05:54 AM

    How many individuals do we have to use as illustration until it becomes representative of what the group thinks ?
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #32

    May 10, 2011, 05:56 AM
    That's a good question. I don't know. But I'm pretty sure that it isn't "one". I think you'll be pretty hard pressed to find a large number of people that share the same views. Why are you so interested in grouping people? Does it satisfy a need for you to belong to a group?
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #33

    May 10, 2011, 06:12 AM

    This isn't about me.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #34

    May 10, 2011, 06:45 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    I linked to the website in the post speech made which kicked off this discussion: Ask Me Help Desk - View Single Post - Latest weapon in the war on climate change. That's the nutjobs I was referring to.
    And among those nutjobs, Van Jones on the board of the Pachamama Aliiance. (from your link and my video). Others on that board of note, Michael Olmstead, Catherine Parrish and John Perkins.
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #35

    May 10, 2011, 06:47 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    And among those nutjobs, Van Jones on the board of the Pachamama Aliiance. (from your link and my video). Others on that board of note, Michael Olmstead, Catherine Parrish and John Perkins.
    So? You can start a website and an organization too. Do it!
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #36

    May 10, 2011, 06:58 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    So? You can start a website and an organization too. Do it!
    It's not a website, it's a movement, and they're dead serious.
    NeedKarma's Avatar
    NeedKarma Posts: 10,635, Reputation: 1706
    Uber Member
     
    #37

    May 10, 2011, 07:00 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    It's not a website, it's a movement, and they're dead serious.
    Ok, start up a counter movement. One that keeps the ideals of all righties alive.
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #38

    May 10, 2011, 07:36 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    It's not a website, it's a movement, and they're dead serious.
    Hello Steve:

    A movement to prove what's already been proven?? Dude! Uhhh, by the way, there's only a war when BOTH sides engage in it... You're the only one fighting this one. The world believes what the scientists say... Bummer that you don't... You DO know that the Earth is round, don't you?

    excon
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #39

    May 10, 2011, 08:31 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Hello Steve:

    A movement to prove what's already been proven??? Dude! Uhhh, by the way, there's only a war when BOTH sides engage in it.... You're the only one fighting this one. The world believes what the scientists say... Bummer that you don't... You DO know that the Earth is round, don't you?

    excon
    It's been proven that nature deserves human rights?
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #40

    May 10, 2011, 03:45 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    It's been proven that nature deserves human rights?
    So monkeys should be allowed to drive a car or an elephant buy the house next to you. Get real! Nature deserves respect that is very different to rights

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

Another rift in the Climate Change ranks [ 11 Answers ]

It seems the idea that man can affect the outcome in dealing with climate change is rapidly coming apart, even the guy who started the idea of global warming says nothing will be achieved at Copenhagen because the approach is fundamentally flawed Global warming 'godfather' goes cold on...

Climate change causes political revolt [ 25 Answers ]

An impending vote on cap and trade legislation has caused a revolt in the Australian parliament which could spill leadership of the key opposition party as the government attempts to stitch up its position ahead of Copenhagen. Abbott to challenge Turnbull This revolt is led by climate change...

EU Agrees Climate Change [ 95 Answers ]

Hello Today ahead of a meeting in Copenhagen it was agreed that the EU will fund the improvement of the newer states to help them bring into line their emissons News Sniffer - Revisionista 'EU strikes climate funding deal' diff viewer (2/3) The essence is the EU will offer some 100bn...

More bad climate change news [ 1 Answers ]

Dead trees spewing greenhouse gases Darn that Bush. Better get out there and plant those trees, or is that bad for wildfires? How does something "slowly" spew anyway? That ain't all the bad news...


View more questions Search