Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #1

    Jun 21, 2008, 10:57 AM
    0 for 7 in Haditha
    Did anyone notice that charges were dismissed against Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani for his alleged role in the alleged Haditha massacre dismissed? I did, and Michelle Malkin summed it up nicely:

    The Marines Vs. Haditha Smear Merchants
    By Michelle Malkin

    Yet another U.S. Marine, Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani, had charges dropped Tuesday in the so-called Haditha massacre -- bringing the total number of Marines who've been cleared or won case dismissals in the Iraq war incident to seven. "Undue command influence" on the prosecution led to the outcome in Chessani's case. Bottom line: That's zero for seven for military prosecutors, with one trial left to go.

    I repeat: Haditha prosecution goes 0-7. But you won't see that headline in the same Armageddon-sized font The New York Times used repeatedly when the story first broke.

    The Times, Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa, and the rest of the anti-war drum-pounders who fueled the smear campaign against the troops two years ago should hang their hands in shame. They won't, of course. Perpetuating the "cold-blooded Marines" narrative means never having to say you're sorry.

    It means never having to look Lt. Col. Chessani (charges dismissed), Lt. Andrew Grayson (acquitted), Lance Cpl. Stephen Tatum (charges dismissed), Capt. Lucas McConnell (charges dismissed), Lance Cpl. Justin Sharratt (charges dismissed), Sgt. Sanick Dela Cruz (charges dismissed), Sgt. Frank Wuterich (awaiting trial) and their families in the eyes and apologize for the preemptive character assassination they all faced at the hands of the hyperventilating, noose-hanging press.

    Murtha and company applied Queen of Hearts ("Off with their heads!") treatment to our own men and women in uniform while giving more benefit of the doubt to foreign terror suspects at Gitmo. It is worth recalling, because the press won't do it for you, what they concluded about the now-crumbling Haditha case in the summer of 2006 before a single formal charge had been filed.

    -- MSNBC hangman Keith Olbermann, who couldn't wait to define the entire war in Iraq by a single moment about which he knew nothing, inveighed that the incident was "willful targeted brutality." Due process? For convicted cop-killer Mumia Abu-Jamal, of course. For our military? Never mind.

    -- Far-left The Nation magazine railed, "Enough details have emerged … to conclude that … members of the 3rd Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment perpetrated a massacre." The publication also judged the event "a willful, targeted brutality designed to send a message to Iraqis." Not content with hanging the troops, the Nation pinned blame on the president and a so-called "culture of impunity" that supposedly permeates the most accountable military in the world.

    -- Singing the same tune as The Nation, The New York Times spilled a flood of front-page ink on the case and took things a step further in a lead editorial blaming not just President Bush, but also top Pentagon brass for the "nightmare" killings in Haditha. Times reporter Paul von Zielbauer filed over 30 stories on the case, which the paper wishfully called the "defining atrocity" of the Iraq war.

    -- Hoping to facilitate a self-fulfilling prophecy, media tools around the world likened Haditha to the Vietnam War's most infamous atrocity -- from The Guardian ("My Lai on the Euphrates?") to the Daily Telegraph ("Massacre in Iraq just like My Lai") to the Los Angeles Times ("What happened at the Iraqi My Lai?") to The New York Times' Maureen Dowd ("My Lai acid flashback") and the Associated Press, which reached into its photo archives to run a 1970 file photo of My Lai to illustrate a Haditha article.

    -- And, of course, there's the permanent stain left by the slanderous propaganda of Rep. Murtha -- the stab in the Marines' backs heard 'round the world: "Our troops overreacted because of the pressure on them, and they killed innocent civilians in cold blood."

    Relatives of the Haditha Marines have called for Congress to censure Murtha, who cuts and runs to the nearest elevator when questioned about the Haditha dismissals. He and the Haditha smear merchants have skated while the men and their families suffered global whippings on the airwaves and eternal demonization in print. Whose "culture of impunity"?
    I think Murtha, Olbermann, the NY Times et al needs to say "we were wrong" and extend their deepest apologies to these Marines and the president and clear their names with as much vigor as that which was used to smear them. And you?
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #2

    Jun 22, 2008, 02:54 AM
    With any justice Murtha ,who is also a king of pork and war profiteer along with a slanderer of brave Marines doing their job,will be voted out of office by the good people of Johnstown Pa. and PA District 12 .His opponent is Lt. Col. Bill Russell.



    His ballot petitions had been successfully challenged and he had been tossed off the ballot by a local judge . He won the Republican primary via a write in effort. But he has been reinserted on the ballot for the general election.
    He is a vet of Desert Storm and was in the Pentagon on 9-11. He is still assigned to the Pentagon until July 26. Then he will be free to campaign . Murtha's slander machine has been making the most of the time he can't campaign because of his continuing oblgation to the military .
    The Tribune Democrat, Johnstown, PA - William Russell: Missing in action

    What a surprise ! Murtha slandering the troops!



    Meanwhile ;Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani is not taking Murtha's cr*p lying down. His lawyer Brian Rooney announced that he will sue Murtha .
    I just wish that as much courtesy had been extended to the Marines falsely charged that Murtha would extend to terrorist detainees.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #3

    Jun 22, 2008, 05:08 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55
    Meanwhile ;Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani is not taking Murtha's cr*p lying down. His lawyer Brian Rooney announced that he will sue Murtha .
    I just wish that as much courtesy had been extended to the Marines falsely charged that Murtha would extend to terrorist detainees.
    Good for the Lieutenant, he doesn't stand a chance in a suit but maybe it will force Murtha to confront the facts. Someone needs to hold these people accountable for their smears.
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #4

    Jun 22, 2008, 06:23 AM
    Hello:

    Dismissed does not mean not guilty. Michelle Malken makes me want to puke.

    excon
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #5

    Jun 23, 2008, 07:20 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by excon
    Hello:

    Dismissed does not mean not guilty. Michelle Malken makes me want to puke.
    Oh come one, ex, I thought you were one for following where the evidence leads. 0 for 7 in this "My Lai on the Euphrates" leads to no conclusions? Are you suggesting that NCIS prosecutors and/or the judge were derelict in their duties? As for Malkin I'll ask you the same thing I asked NK, what difference does the messenger make if the message is true? Do you think Lt. Col. Chessani is guilty? Did this soldier deserve to be worse than swiftboated by the media and multiple members of congress? From his 2006 combat Fitrep:

    * “Leads Marines from front in every operation. Demonstrates moral courage everyday. Doesn’t hesitate to report bad news fast or contest unrealistic plans/poor concepts. Despite the complexity and size of his AO [area of operations], he always maintains a calm, cool demeanor.”

    * “Always seeks advantage over complex, diverse insurgent enemy. Truly one of the finer thinkers in this COIN [counterinsurgency] environment.”

    * “One of the top 3 infantry/Cav Bn commanders of 13 who have served with RCT –2 [the regiment] during OIF. A superb leader, who knows his men, knows the enemy, knows his business. Doesn’t attract a lot of fanfare; just gets the job done to an exceedingly high standard.”

    * “Long ball hitter; recommend selection for promotion to Colonel and TLS [Top Level School].”

    The Reviewing Officer, Major General Huck added his comments: “Top notch officer with outstanding potential. Promote and select for TLS [Top Level School]. Post TLS slate for Regimental command and subsequent joint tour. Unlimited potential and value to the Marine Corps. Capable of the most challenging assignments.”
    If you’ll read the defense motion to dismiss (pdf) you’ll learn these were men declared guilty by the media and multiple members of congress without benefit of a trial, That should send chills down your spine, ex.

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.



View more questions Search