Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
    London42's Avatar
    London42 Posts: 1, Reputation: 1
    New Member

    Dec 17, 2010, 10:00 AM
    Bible view of artificial life support
    I want to know the Bible view of placing a family member on artificial life support... not interested in views and rationlizatons of what people have done [both sides] in their situation. Thank you.
    joypulv's Avatar
    joypulv Posts: 21,593, Reputation: 2941
    current pert

    Dec 17, 2010, 11:23 AM
    I've never heard of any passage in the Bible that covers artificial life support.
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 38,514, Reputation: 5430
    Jobs & Parenting Expert

    Dec 17, 2010, 12:01 PM

    Artificial life support is adiaphora, which means the Bible is not clear on how something should be considered by a Christian. Artificial life support is outside of moral law (actions which are neither morally mandated nor morally forbidden). The following is from (bolding is mine) --

    It is important to maintain a clear distinction between killing a person and letting someone die. Killing in the wrongful sense of murder, as prohibited in Exodus 20:13, means actively doing something to a patient that hastens or causes his or her death. But “letting someone die” means allowing someone to die without interfering with the process that is already taking place. In cases where it is clearly known to be the patient's wish to be allowed to die, and when there is no reasonable human hope of recovery, and where death seems imminent—then it does not seem wrong to allow such a person to die, rather than either to initiate an artificial life support system or to prolong the natural dying process by artificial means. For such situations, nothing in Scripture would prohibit a dying person from praying for God to take his life. On the other hand, where there is a reasonable human hope of recovery, and where there is a realistic, practical ability to help, the obligation to “love your neighbor as yourself” (Matt. 22:39) implies that active measures should be taken to save the person's life. In the parable of the good Samaritan, Jesus indicated that the priest and the Levite were both wrong for neglecting to do what could be done to save a badly injured man, who with care was able to recover (Luke 10:30–37).

    The hardest end-of-life decisions are often related to removing a dying patient from artificial life support, which can involve various measures from an artificial lung to simply providing artificial hydration and nutrition. Christians hold different positions over exactly when in such cases the moral line is crossed from letting someone die to killing. When considering the proper course of action, Christians should remember that while death is an enemy to resist (1 Cor. 15:26), natural mortality is still part of living in a fallen world (cf. Gen. 2:17; Rom. 5:12; Heb. 9:27). There is therefore nothing wrong with accepting natural mortality by removing a dying patient from artificial means that are only slowing the natural death process.

    There are more complex cases where medication given to alleviate a patient's pain may also have a secondary effect of hastening a person's death. In such cases, some Christian ethicists say that the two most important considerations are: (1) the primary purpose for giving the medication and (2) the patient's own wishes regarding the alleviation of pain. Other Christian ethicists claim that, in such cases, the moral value of improving life quality is always less than the moral value of honoring the sanctity of human life, and, while doing what they can to alleviate pain, Christians should never give higher priority to improving the quality of life (reducing pain) over honoring the sanctity of life (not killing a person).

    Wherever possible, it is both wise and loving for people who are still in good health to complete the appropriate legal and medical forms to make known their wishes regarding medical care at the end of life. These decisions should also be verbally communicated to those who will likely have to make end-of-life decisions about each person.

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions


Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.

Check out some similar questions!

View that the city life would have been impossible without the use of metals [ 1 Answers ]

view that the city life would have been impossible without the use of metals

Why view postmodern life in the negative way as portaryed in the movie Bladerunner? [ 1 Answers ]

Please would someone help answer the question relating to the film Bladerunner? The film portrays a negative apocalyptic view of postmodern life, so I need to know the why we should view postmodern life in the same negative way? This is a sociology question so the answer should reflect this subject...

Life support [ 7 Answers ]

I'm in nursing school and today in one of my classes we were talking about death, dying and bereavement. This topic interested got me thinking, and I am curious how others feel about it. If you were terminally ill, would you want to be put on life support to live your life as long as...

Life is to hard for me.I need support.:( [ 9 Answers ]

OK where do I start I'm 14 yrs old. I'm a average kid and I love sports a lot and some video games. My home life is pretty good. I have both parents and siblings. I live in a normal house with a pool so I do have fun. Now here is the problem. School. I can't take it. I failed the regents with a...

In his life for a long time.guy's view? [ 4 Answers ]

I was just starting to see someone and told him I would rather be friends if he was seeing other women. He basically told me I could trust him and he wouldn't hurt me. I did. Then I found out he was indeed seeing other women, many other women. I got upset, very very upset. He apologized, wanted to...

View more questions Search