![Quote](custom/vgo/images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
jamier04
I just read the answer stating that most heavy drinking episodes the clearence times are less than 80 hours. I'm still confused why they say up to 80 hours when most people are free of etg before 80 hours even if they drank heavily, that is if the person is in good health.
Your question is well founded and authoritatively posed in the study performed by Wojcik & Hawthorne (2007):
"...sensitivity and the window of detection was typically reported only in very general terms using phrases like 'up to 80 h', or 'up to 5 days', without the caveat that these detection windows apply only to the most extreme cases"
The commercial testing industry has a financial interest in emphasizing the greatest potential of their product. To make it sound or look as good as possible. That's commercialism. That's advertising.
But as the above study indicates this tendency also pervades the scientific literature. That is not so easily explained.
The above study also noted that:
"Most of the research is designed to find the true positives, but it is not reliable for determining the rate of false negatives"
The instrumentality (sensitivity) of the test is near 100%, that is the ability to detect EtG/EtS, yet reliability and validity of the test to accomplish the stated purpose is admittedly zero.
You would probably find the above study interesting, a link to the full study is available
here.
NOTE: Subsequent studies have essentially dismantled the original research claims, yet it continues to be the most used method for detecting alcohol consumption.