Originally Posted by achampio21
Let me explain it like this....
This is kind of like a smaller caliber of the OJ Simpson case. He killed his wife. But was found not guilty. The family of his wife sued him for millions. Did they need the money? No. Was that money technically owed to them? No. Was it more for a "revenge" thing? Yes. Did they probably deserve it? Yes.
My mother "legally harrassed" me (using lawyer terms) for 3 years by switching the cases around every year just to keep me in court. She had a discounted lawyer due to her being on SS disabilty. Did I have a discounted lawyer? NO! Did she know she wouldn't get custody? YES, but fought for it anyway just so I would have to pay. And she basically stole my identity and forged my name to several things to obtain money. 3 life insurance policies, a bank account, and a retirement fund. All of which she didn't get any kind of charges for. SO do I think it's justified that she give me that money back plus the lawyer fees I paid for the BS cases? Heck yes.