Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    incognito's Avatar
    incognito Posts: 92, Reputation: 24
    Junior Member
     
    #1

    May 6, 2007, 06:35 PM
    Writing a Logarithm as a Single Term w/o a log
    Hello,
    I need help solving this problem:

    "Write 10^(log3x^2+log5x) as a single term that does not contain a logarithm"

    Now, I tried to get rid of the log's by changing everything to a common log, but that just leaves trying a 0 to as X.
    This doesn't seem right.

    Can someone please explain how to solve this problem.
    Many thanks.
    galactus's Avatar
    galactus Posts: 2,271, Reputation: 282
    Ultra Member
     
    #2

    May 7, 2007, 07:18 AM
    ebaines's Avatar
    ebaines Posts: 12,131, Reputation: 1307
    Expert
     
    #3

    May 7, 2007, 07:18 AM
    Where exactly are you getting stumped? If you apply the various identities for powers and logarithms, you'll get it:

    10^(log A) = A
    log(a*b) = log(a) + log(b)
    log(a^b) = b log(a)
    10^(a+b) = 10^a * 10^b
    10^(a*b) = (10^a)^b
    incognito's Avatar
    incognito Posts: 92, Reputation: 24
    Junior Member
     
    #4

    May 7, 2007, 09:59 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by galactus

    Isn't that still leaving a log term? 10^log15x^3
    incognito's Avatar
    incognito Posts: 92, Reputation: 24
    Junior Member
     
    #5

    May 7, 2007, 10:05 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by ebaines
    Where exactly are you getting stumped? If you apply the various identities for powers and logarithms, you'll get it:

    10^(log A) = A
    log(a*b) = log(a) + log(b)
    log(a^b) = b log(a)
    10^(a+b) = 10^a * 10^b
    10^(a*b) = (10^a)^b

    I ended up getting 150x^3
    I multiplied the exponential logs, then used the 3rd property of logarithms to move the exponent in from of log 10, then I canceled out logs and multiplied everything together.
    Is that even possible?
    galactus's Avatar
    galactus Posts: 2,271, Reputation: 282
    Ultra Member
     
    #6

    May 7, 2007, 10:09 AM
    Incognito, I gave you a worked out solution. 15x^3. I see no log in that. They have been eliminated

    See, . The same as if

    Oh well, I tried.
    incognito's Avatar
    incognito Posts: 92, Reputation: 24
    Junior Member
     
    #7

    May 7, 2007, 02:43 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by galactus
    Incognito, I gave you a worked out solution. 15x^3. I see no log in that. They have been eliminated

    See, . The same as if

    Oh well, I tried.

    NNNOOOO WWWWAAAAAIIIITTTTT!
    Haha, my teacher only had one lecture on logarithms and the book is of no help.
    I didn't know that when you "added" logs, the log part cancels out.
    Is this a Theorem or Property?

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search


Check out some similar questions!

Short term vs long term capital gains, loss carryovers [ 4 Answers ]

Back in 2000 and 2001, I had short term capital losses that exceeded the 3000 dollar limit. Each year, I've been able to deduct 3000 dollars since my short term gains have been minimal. I still haven't used up all my 2000 and 2001 short term losses. I had some long term gains in 2000, but...

How come single men fall for emtional games from single women but not married ones? [ 75 Answers ]

Okay this was brought up in another post by Wildcat. I didn’t want to take away from the original poster but this has been on my mind all day and I just want to get some other feedback on it. The OP was a mistress and as WC points out we’ve been seeing a lot of that here lately. Here’s what WC...

Logarithm problem [ 2 Answers ]

Approximate: log a 16, given log a 2=.4307

Is short-term or long-term debt more stressful to your personal finances? Why? [ 4 Answers ]

Is short-term or long-term debt more stressful to your personal finances? Why?

How to view single record of ALL people at single address? [ 5 Answers ]

I have a table with addresses and names. I can easily sort it by address to see all the people living at the same address grouped together. However, this is problematic with mail-merges, since I wind up generating a new letter for each person, sending multiple mailings to the same residence. ...


View more questions Search