Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    Curlyben's Avatar
    Curlyben Posts: 18,514, Reputation: 1860
    BossMan
     
    #1

    Dec 4, 2022, 09:06 AM
    Trump's call for 'end' of constitution condemned...
    This utterly beggars belief.
    Can those with access to Truth Social quote the actual post, so we can all draw our own conclusions on this...
    Would be interested on @tomder55 and @jlisenbe's take on this.

    Quote Originally Posted by BBC News
    The White House has condemned former President Donald Trump after he called for the "termination" of the US constitution.

    Mr Trump made the comments in a post to his Truth social network on Saturday while repeating his false claim that he won the 2020 presidential election.

    He also accused "Big Tech Companies" of colluding against him with Democrats.

    White House spokesman Andrew Bates said Mr Trump's comments were "anathema to the soul of our nation".

    "You cannot only love America when you win," Mr Bates said in a statement.

    He added that Mr Trump's comments should be "universally condemned" - seemingly a pointed jab at senior Republicans who have so far avoided criticising the former president's outburst.

    Other senior Democrats also challenged Republicans - including Rep Eric Swalwell who questioned how the party's members could continue to refer to themselves as "Constitutional conservatives" if they didn't condemn the comments.
    Trump's call for 'end' of constitution condemned
    jlisenbe's Avatar
    jlisenbe Posts: 5,019, Reputation: 157
    Uber Member
     
    #2

    Dec 4, 2022, 12:57 PM
    So far as I can find, this is the actual quote.

    “A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution,”

    It's hard to know exactly what he meant by that. I'd like to see it in context. It seems to be truncated if the hanging comma at the end is any indication.

    This is unquestionably true. "He also accused "Big Tech Companies" of colluding against him with Democrats."

    Was this directed at Hillary? ""You cannot only love America when you win," Mr Bates said in a statement."
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 39,354, Reputation: 5431
    Jobs & Parenting Expert
     
    #3

    Dec 4, 2022, 01:06 PM
    The quote:

    "Do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution,” Trump wrote in a post on the social network Truth Social and accused “Big Tech” of working closely with Democrats. “Our great ‘Founders’ did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!”
    jlisenbe's Avatar
    jlisenbe Posts: 5,019, Reputation: 157
    Uber Member
     
    #4

    Dec 4, 2022, 01:12 PM
    This was all said in response to the revelations of high tech collusion to get Biden elected as shown by the Twitter file releases.

    Trump made the statement in response to the release of the "Twitter Files" on Friday, a trove of documents detailing Twitter's communications on censorship. Trump argued the files showed evidence of "fraud and deception" in the 2020 election and went on to argue parts of the Constitution should be terminated to address it.
    jlisenbe's Avatar
    jlisenbe Posts: 5,019, Reputation: 157
    Uber Member
     
    #5

    Dec 4, 2022, 01:20 PM
    It never ceases to fascinate me how liberals can happily overlook the obvious truth of big tech collusion to push the election to Biden, but then have a fit over a statement by Trump, the meaning of which is still unclear.
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 39,354, Reputation: 5431
    Jobs & Parenting Expert
     
    #6

    Dec 4, 2022, 01:35 PM
    Big tech money and collusion had pushed the election to Trump. And the effort is still going on for 2024.
    Curlyben's Avatar
    Curlyben Posts: 18,514, Reputation: 1860
    BossMan
     
    #7

    Dec 4, 2022, 01:37 PM
    Context is everything, however 60+ court cases have already proved, without doubt, that the election was conducted as prescribed.
    Unless of course we're trying to overlook the constitutional limitation on presidential terms...
    jlisenbe's Avatar
    jlisenbe Posts: 5,019, Reputation: 157
    Uber Member
     
    #8

    Dec 4, 2022, 01:49 PM
    Big tech money and collusion had pushed the election to Trump. And the effort is still going on for 2024.
    A contention for which there is zero evidence.

    however 60+ court cases have already proved, without doubt, that the election was conducted as prescribed.
    Actually not, as I understand it, true. It has only shown that there was insufficient evidence for a court case to proceed. It certainly has not shown that the election was conducted properly. There is no doubt but that such an idea is untrue.

    https://2020electionirregularities.com/
    Curlyben's Avatar
    Curlyben Posts: 18,514, Reputation: 1860
    BossMan
     
    #9

    Dec 4, 2022, 02:15 PM
    And that looks like a completely unbiased analyses of the vote...
    Stats can be used to backup any line of reasoning given the right context.
    There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.

    I'd much prefer the American Bar site: https://www.americanbar.org/groups/p...aw/litigation/
    jlisenbe's Avatar
    jlisenbe Posts: 5,019, Reputation: 157
    Uber Member
     
    #10

    Dec 4, 2022, 03:57 PM
    The analysis was not of the vote. The analysis was of the news coverage and the collusion by much of the news media to bury the Hunter Biden laptop story in order to push for Biden's election.
    Curlyben's Avatar
    Curlyben Posts: 18,514, Reputation: 1860
    BossMan
     
    #11

    Dec 4, 2022, 04:02 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by jlisenbe View Post
    The analysis was not of the vote. The analysis was of the news coverage and the collusion by much of the news media to bury the Hunter Biden laptop story in order to push for Biden's election.
    So, generally pretty meaningless...
    One of these days politicians will fight election battles on what THEY will do for the country and not continually trying to smear the opposing side..
    All very juvenile school yard bullying.
    jlisenbe's Avatar
    jlisenbe Posts: 5,019, Reputation: 157
    Uber Member
     
    #12

    Dec 4, 2022, 04:35 PM
    So, generally pretty meaningless...
    Strange how everything that favored Biden is somehow "meaningless".
    Curlyben's Avatar
    Curlyben Posts: 18,514, Reputation: 1860
    BossMan
     
    #13

    Dec 5, 2022, 12:33 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by jlisenbe View Post
    Strange how everything that favored Biden is somehow "meaningless".
    Think you should go back and read the site you linked to.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #14

    Dec 5, 2022, 04:06 AM
    Not to defend Trump's comment but I would argue that the violation of Constitution occurred de facto long before the 2020 elections .

    As far as BigTech collusion ;please refer to my post about the Twitter files ,
    The Twitter Files (askmehelpdesk.com)
    Curlyben's Avatar
    Curlyben Posts: 18,514, Reputation: 1860
    BossMan
     
    #15

    Dec 5, 2022, 04:18 AM
    Interesting, however what part of the Constitution do you see as being violated ?
    We all know Social media algorithms create unnatural echo chambers for all uses, makes the sites more sticky.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #16

    Dec 5, 2022, 05:20 AM
    It was not algorithms It was a conscious decision by Twitter's top exec censor in chief Vijay Gadde (Jack Dorsey allegedly was not aware this was happening ) who made the suppression decisions . This was a conscious decision to violate the 1st amendment protections of speech through the use of proxies . This included Gadde ;former FBI council James Baker ;who left the FBI to become Twitter's council .

    Former Twitter global communications VP Brandon Borrman questioned “Can we truthfully claim that this is part of the policy?” Baker replied falsely “It’s reasonable for us to assume that they may have been [hacked] and that caution is warranted.”
    Baker knew the laptop was authentic and in the hands of the FBI.

    Emails throughout the Twitter world that are being released show that the censorship was in the word of one employee " f-ed"

    Elon Musk releases Twitter's files on censorship of Post (nypost.com)

    They went so far as suspending the account of White House Press Sec Kayleigh McEnany for linking to the NY Post article that broke the lap top story .

    Had it been a public service but private communication company like the phone services that cut access to those who's politics they did not agree with then it would not have been tolerated and in fact a violation of the Constitution . But big tech ,which in today's world has surpassed in many instances the importance of the traditional communication infrastructure ,is permitted this outrageous censorship on behalf of the leviathan state .

    Requests by the 2020 Quid Pro Joe campaign and the DNC was all that was required by big Tech to have routinely stopped others from discussing or hearing opposing views.
    Having threatened and cajoled social-media platforms for years to censor viewpoints and speakers disfavored by the Left, senior government officials in the Executive Branch have moved into a phase of open collusion with social-media companies to suppress disfavored speakers, viewpoints, and content on social-media platforms under the Orwellian guise of halting so-called “disinformation,” “misinformation,” and “malinformation.The aggressive censorship that Defendants have procured constitutes government action for at least five reasons: (1) absent federal intervention, common-law and statutory doctrines, as well as voluntary conduct and natural free-market forces, would have restrained the emergence ofcensorship and suppression of speech of disfavored speakers, content, and viewpoint on social media; and yet (2) through Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) and other actions, the federal government subsidized, fostered, encouraged, and empowered the creation of a small number of massive social-media companies with disproportionate ability to censor and suppress speech on the basis of speaker, content, and viewpoint; (3) such inducements as Section 230 and other legal benefits (such as the absence of antitrust enforcement) constitute an immensely valuable benefit to social-media platforms and incentive to do the bidding of federal officials; (4) federal officials—including, most notably, certain Defendants herein—have repeatedly and aggressively threatened to remove these legal benefits and impose other adverse consequences on social-media platforms if they do not aggressively censor and suppress disfavored speakers, content, and viewpoints on their platforms; and (5) Defendants herein, colluding and coordinating with each other, have also directly coordinated and colluded with social-media platforms to identify disfavored speakers, viewpoints, and content and thus have procured the actual censorship and suppression of the freedom of speech.

    Doc.-45-First-Amended-Complaint.pdf (nclalegal.org)
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #17

    Dec 5, 2022, 05:40 AM
    Ben I will move my Twitter posting here to consolidate You can close my posting so there is no duplication

    The Twitter Files
    Musk is releasing proof of how Twitter and big tech colluded with Quid Pro Joe to rig the 2020 elections by suppressing the content of the Hunter Biden laptop

    Just a reminder of one of the key texts that was on the computer .

    “I hope you all can do what I did and pay for everything for this entire family for 30 years. It’s really hard. But don’t worry, unlike Pop, I won’t make you give me half of your salary.”(Hunter Biden, text message to daughter Naomi, 2019)

    China, Ukraine and Russia threw millions of dollars to the Biden Crime Family .“The Big Guy” got 10 percent.

    What is missing from the files to date is the role of the Intel community that lied to America and called the laptop Russian disinformation. What is also missing is the FBI; having the laptop in their possession ,slow walked the Hunter Biden investigation past the 2020 election and even past the 2022 .

    These agencies of the government gave cover to the deep state selected candidate . Yes the deep state was involved . It selected Clueless Joe to be the Dem standard bearer after Bolshevik Bernie was winning all the early primaries . Then Rep of South Carolina James Clayborn spoke up for the deep state and gave the nod to Joe . It is no surprise that Joe is taking steps to ensure that states like Iowa and New Hampshire will no longer hold the early Dem primaries /caucus .

    The compliant press ,especially taxpayer supported NPR also participated in the cover up with managing editor Terence Samuel saying “We don’t want to waste our time on stories that are not really stories, and we don’t want to waste the listeners’ and readers’ time on stories that are just pure distractions”

    A presidential election ongoing and the national public radio station did not want to "waste time" on a major story about one of the candidates . No collusion there </sarc>

    The crackhead whore mongering son of the VP was doing very well for himself as he navigated the world of international business . Who was the bigger whoremonger ....Hunter or the 'Big Guy ' ?
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #18

    Dec 5, 2022, 05:54 AM
    Ben here is the exact quote pulled from 'Truth'

    So, with the revelation of MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION in working closely with Big Tech Companies, the DNC, & the Democrat Party, do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. Our great “Founders” did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!
    @realDonaldTrump's post | Truth Social
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #19

    Dec 5, 2022, 06:03 AM
    The compliant press was for all practical purposes ignoring the Twitter drop . Trump's comments lit a fire ...... mission accomplished .
    jlisenbe's Avatar
    jlisenbe Posts: 5,019, Reputation: 157
    Uber Member
     
    #20

    Dec 5, 2022, 06:18 AM
    Think you should go back and read the site you linked to.
    I don't link sites I haven't read.

    It's hard to reason with people who see everything through "I despise Trump" lenses. Any and all activities are acceptable so long as they assist in bringing the former pres down.

    The sad thing about it all is that those people who led the anti-Trump collusion in the media will not be held accountable and life will go on as before.

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

Trump Foundation Sued, Trump A Crook - NY Attorney General [ 19 Answers ]

Blatant illegal dealing by the "art of the deal" self-proclaimed "genius". First there was the fraudulent Trump University which Colludin' Donald had to pay $25 million to settle. Now it's the equally fraudulent Trump Foundation that the New York Attorney General is suing. This...

In Part 1, what do you learn about the condemned man? [ 2 Answers ]

An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge

Is leak from condemned gas hob carbon monoxide [ 0 Answers ]

At what stage of combustion does natural gas become carbon monoxide and cause a leak from gas hob

Condemned by city inspectors [ 1 Answers ]

We rent a mobile home that has been condemned and we have 72 hrs to vacate b y the city inspectors... is the landlord of the mobile home resposible to help us find and pay for a place? We have asked them more than once to fix things in the home and there answer was, that they will do it when they...


View more questions Search