Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    jlisenbe's Avatar
    jlisenbe Posts: 5,020, Reputation: 157
    Uber Member
     
    #1

    Jul 3, 2022, 05:51 AM
    Lawless Executive Branch
    The Biden admin's propensity to play politics with the law is on full display outside the homes of some of the SC justices.

    The Republican governors of Virginia and Maryland have responded to a letter from the Supreme Court's top-ranking security official calling on them to utilize police and law enforcement to prevent picketing at the homes of justices.
    "The governor agrees with the Marshal that the threatening activity outside the Justices' homes has increased," Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin spokesperson Christian Martinez said in response to a letter from Supreme Court Marshal Gail Curley calling on the governor to "enforce state law" that prohibits picketing outside the homes of the justices.
    "He welcomes the Marshal of the Supreme Court's request for Fairfax County to enforce state law as they are the primary enforcement authority for the state statute," the statement added.
    Youngkin also called on Attorney General Merrick Garland to "do his job" by "enforcing the much more robust federal law."
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #2

    Jul 3, 2022, 10:32 AM
    It is against Federal Law. (18 US code 1507) Why doesn't Garland act ?
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #3

    Jul 3, 2022, 11:26 AM
    Heard and interesting thought. Once the decision was made public there was no longer “intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer”
    That could only happen before the decision was released .

    Brought to court ,the court would side with protestors on pulbic sidewalks on 1st amendment grounds.

    That may be why Curley is seeking enforcement of state laws as an alternative to federal enforcement. But if Federal laws could be challenged over 1st amendment protection then so could State laws . She works under direction of the court ,not the executive branch .

    But let's say then that a state does what she asks ;then the arrest gets challenged in court ;and the case makes it to SCOTUS . Is there then a conflict of interest if Roberts directed her to make the request ?

    Anyway this is a classic example of solving a problem by passing the buck . Typical swamp.

    Did Curely act on her own ;with coordination of Chief Justice Roberts ?

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

The chickens coming home to roost in lawless Blue America [ 35 Answers ]

What started as a San Fran issue has gone to Blue cities across the USA. Thieves target Nordstrom, other stores across Bay Area in weekend spree (therealdeal.com) Smash and Grab has become the phrase to describe the lawless mobs that bum rush retail stores in San Fran, Chi town,LA NYC and ,...

What does the executive branch do [ 1 Answers ]

What does the executive branch do?

Congress influence on executive branch [ 7 Answers ]

In a clash between the executive branch and the legislative branch over an issue such as the U.S. budget, what powers can Congress bring to bear to influence the executive branch? What are some limits to its ability to get its way?

Is my BP executive summary all right? [ 2 Answers ]

Business plan 1.1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Enhle Industries is a wooden products manufacturing company established In 2004, and located about 100 km from Gaborone, in the village of Kanye in Botswana. It is doing business in the catering Industry. The Company exists to design,...


View more questions Search