Zuckerberg's platform will not tolerate political or popular thought he does not agree with .
As it turns out, that's fairly typical.
FB's clearly using politically motivated policies as is Twitter. Starting with Donald Trump, the list continues through a variety of conservative voices. The message is clear. "Disagree with us and we'll silence you." It reminds me of the concepts of hate speech and hate crimes. Who gets to decide what amounts to "hate"?
I don't expect much to come from Haugen's testimony. By means of comparison, a parent by the name of Stacy Langton testified recently at the Fairfax County School Board meeting about two books in the school library which not only spoke of oral sex between men and boys, but even had pictures of the activity. The school board pres proceeded to shut her down since, she said, there were children present at the meeting. It seemed to completely escape her that the books were in a library where children could read them. There was no outrage expressed by any of the school board members and no promises of immediate action to clear the library of such books. Such is much of our country now. Child porn is present in school libraries including books which are advocating for the sexual abuse of children, and no action is deemed necessary. The libraries will simply be allowed to continue as moral cesspools, now being reinforced by the Biden admin's decision to sic the Justice Department on people who dare to stand up at school board meetings and express their contrary opinions. The message to Ms. Langton ended up being, "Thanks for nothing. Now keep your mouth shut or we'll investigate you."
So good luck to Ms. Haugen. I imagine her testimony will be duly listened to and noted, and that will be the end of that. The Congress is too busy considering the 250 billion dollars of infrastructure improvement contained in the 3.5 trillion dollar infrastructure bill.
https://www.fairfaxtimes.com/article...7e3ad96b6.html
https://asrainvestigates.substack.co...the-x-rated-in