Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    jlisenbe's Avatar
    jlisenbe Posts: 5,020, Reputation: 157
    Uber Member
     
    #21

    Aug 30, 2021, 12:53 PM
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 39,354, Reputation: 5431
    Jobs & Parenting Expert
     
    #22

    Aug 30, 2021, 12:58 PM
    Why didn't Trump solve the problems in Afghanistan and get us out?
    jlisenbe's Avatar
    jlisenbe Posts: 5,020, Reputation: 157
    Uber Member
     
    #23

    Aug 30, 2021, 01:05 PM
    Yeah. It's all Trump's fault.

    Good grief.
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 39,354, Reputation: 5431
    Jobs & Parenting Expert
     
    #24

    Aug 30, 2021, 01:39 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by jlisenbe View Post
    Yeah. It's all Trump's fault.

    Good grief.
    Why didn't he? He was cleaning up the world and protecting us with a wall on the southern border and limiting the influx of refugees and immigrants.
    jlisenbe's Avatar
    jlisenbe Posts: 5,020, Reputation: 157
    Uber Member
     
    #25

    Aug 30, 2021, 02:53 PM
    Trump was the one who signed the agreement that we would withdraw back in May. Few people are criticizing Biden for the withdrawal. It is the incredibly inept manner in which it has been done that is at issue, and it has clearly been a disaster. I just wonder what liberal dems are going to say when we have to start talks to get all of the remaining Americans (think "hostages") out.
    Wondergirl's Avatar
    Wondergirl Posts: 39,354, Reputation: 5431
    Jobs & Parenting Expert
     
    #26

    Aug 30, 2021, 03:42 PM
    The talks have been going on already.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #27

    Aug 30, 2021, 04:03 PM
    The Taliban did not attack troops for over 18 months during Trump's watch while the withdrawal was being negotiated . All they needed to see was the way he dispatched IRGC boss Qasem Soleimani to know that they would rather not cross him up .
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #28

    Sep 1, 2021, 05:55 AM
    Quid says he wants to shift to low intensity "over the horizon drone warfare (the last drone attack killed more than 10 innocent Aghani civilians ) . But without Bagram Air base that horizon is almost 1200 miles away. That's a 6 hr flight after assessing the intel; and arming /fueling the drone . Situations change rapidly in that time frame .That is how the target got close to the Kabul air base in an area surrounded by civilians . The choice ? Attack the truck and kill innocents or let the suicide attack occur.

    We do not have a very sophisticated drone strike force . Oh the explosions make for great video . But we do not have anything close to a drone warfare doctrine . The Houthis using Iranian cheap swarm drones are better at it by far.
    . “By using an unconventional long range strike capability, the [Iran backed] Houthi have consistently demonstrated an ability to penetrate modern air defenses and achieve strategic effects despite being overmatched in technology, manpower and funding” by the Saudi-led coalition.

    Developing Unconventional Long Range Strike Capability for the ADF - Part 1 | The Cove (army.gov.au)

    The highest profile and successful attack occurred on 14 September 2019, targeting the ARMACO facility in Abqaiq. While some of the details of this strike are disputed, the successful penetration of air defence and the effects are in no doubt. The attack utilised a combination of up to 25 OWA UAVs and ballistic missiles, and disrupted 50% of Saudi’s oil output and 6% of global supply.

    And Iranian drones are becoming much more sophisticated ;thanks to the good ole USA .
    https://theaviationist.Com/2016/10/0...stealth-drone/

    Quid tried to get Putin to agree for US bases in the formerly Soviet 'Stans' nations to conduct his counter terrorism strategy The Dems have given Putin no reason to do so .

    Russian President Vladimir Putin, during a June 16 summit meeting with President Biden, objected to any role for American forces in Central Asian countries, senior U.S. and Russian officials said, undercutting the U.S. military’s efforts to act against new terrorist dangers after its Afghanistan withdrawal. The previously unreported exchange between the U.S. and Russian leaders has complicated the U.S. military’s options for basing drones and other counterterrorism forces in countries bordering landlocked Afghanistan.

    Putin Rejected Role for U.S. Forces Near Afghanistan at Summit With Biden - WSJ

    Another complication of course is that we now have no one on the ground we can trust to direct the attacks . US troops ? Gone .CIA ? They bugged out early . The Diplomats ? They were on some of the 1st planes out . The Afghan Army ? They cut and run when funding and America's withdrawal date was set .
    jlisenbe's Avatar
    jlisenbe Posts: 5,020, Reputation: 157
    Uber Member
     
    #29

    Sep 1, 2021, 06:04 AM
    We should never have pulled out. Staying would have had its negatives, but pulling out has far more. We had developed a good strategy for our forces that was largely non-combat. It was a foolish move that we will live to regret.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #30

    Sep 1, 2021, 08:08 AM
    Bagram would've been an outpost equivalent to our troops on the 38th parallel ;or in Gitmo .

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

Qualifications for Presidency [ 2 Answers ]

Qualifications for Presidency An eighth grade teacher was leading a discussion on the qualifications for being president of the United States. After the teacher commented that a person must be a natural-born citizen, one of the students raised her hand: Does that mean that if you were born by...

The Imperial Presidency [ 13 Answers ]

Remember the time not so long ago when the Dems and the compliant media would complain about President Bush's use of signing statements ,executive orders and recess appointments ? Well that was then ;and since "Bush did it " (the new corollary to "it's Bush's fault) President Obama is planning...

Who is trying to buy the presidency? [ 11 Answers ]

The word is that Obama has spent $300,000,000.00 (before tha last infomercials). No one in their right mind believes this astronomical sum came from blue collar workers. So I would like to know just who has that kind of money and wants Obama in the White House. This whole thing stinks like a skunk...

Power of the Presidency [ 2 Answers ]

The Power of the Presidency has been cause for debate MAINLY because why? A) The presidency is the most powerful office in the world. B) The Constitution provided a loose definition of executive power. C) The presidency is an office that operates in full view of the public. D) Leaders wanted to...

The Imperial Presidency [ 20 Answers ]

Hello Rightys: It appears that George Bush has taken on some additional duties for himself(and I use the term loosely). You could argue that he hasn't, and you'd be wrong. However, my question isn't about him. Of course, if his expanded view of the presidency isn't curtailed, whoever...


View more questions Search