[jlisenbe]

I guess it's your genre. We KNOW you read porn because you just admitted to it, and it would be a strange thing to testify to on a message board, but I guess that's how liberal dems do things? Sorry to disappoint you, but I did not. Now that was largely because I had no access to it, and for that I am eternally grateful. But I'm just glad to read that you now admit it is porn. A few months ago you tried to suggest it was not, perhaps believing it ranked up there with Shakespeare?

One thing I believe we can say for sure. If DJT had written it, you would call it porn with a capital P, but since you don't despise SA, then it is "soft" porn. Is it "soft" porn only when liberal dems write it? Is that how you determine the difference?

[Wondergirl]

I guess it's your genre. We KNOW you read porn because you just admitted to it, and it would be a strange thing to testify to on a message board, but I guess that's how liberal dems do things?

I'm not a liberal Dem.

But I'm just glad to read that you now admit it is porn. A few months ago you tried to suggest it was not, perhaps believing it ranked up there with Shakespeare?

Apparently, you've never read soft porn -- or you did and yawned. It ain't stimulating and visual, is usually emotional. Many romance novelists incorporate soft porn in their stories.

One thing I believe we can say for sure. If DJT had written it, you would call it porn with a capital P

Donnie couldn't write his way out of a paper bag. That's why his daddy had to pay his way through school.

[jlisenbe]

Apparently, you've never read soft porn -- or you did and yawned. It ain't stimulating and visual, is usually emotional. Many romance novelists incorporate soft porn in their stories.

Sure it is. If anyone's interested, here are some samples of SA's "literary" efforts. Practically everyone, I imagine, regard graphic descriptions of people having sex to be porn, unless a person is a committed liberal democrat apologist.

https://thefederalist.com/2018/11/02...omance-novels/

[Wondergirl]

And how many pages out of the total pages does her soft porn take up in one of her romance novels?

You forbid me and others to read soft porn in romance novels? No sex. The bedroom door gets closed when it's time for sex, and the reader is left alone in the hallway.

Check out romances by Elizabeth St. Michel. She and I both grew up in a tiny German farming community in western NY.
https://elizabethstmichel.com

[jlisenbe]

And how many pages out of the total pages does her soft porn take up in one of her romance novels?

First you called it soft porn. Now you call it "romance". Hmmm.

You forbid me and others to read soft porn in romance novels? No sex. The door gets closed when it's time for sex.

I have not forbidden you or anyone else to do anything. I have simply pointed out that you read it. In fact, you pointed that out yourself.

Check out romances by Elizabeth St. Michel. She and I both grew up in a tiny German farming community in western NY.

I have no intention to read porn, soft or otherwise.

Look, read what you want. It's none of my business. In fact, you are the one who seemed to be bragging about reading "soft porn" and thus brought the subject up of what you read. One way or the other, you are free to do what you want, but if you start this nonsense about wanting Trump out because of his many foolish sexual remarks, I'm going to point out every time your support of a porn author who would seem to be involved in voter fraud. The pot should not call the kettle black.

[Wondergirl]

One way or the other, you are free to do what you want

Then stop hassling me.

but if you start this nonsense about wanting Trump out because of his many foolish sexual remarks, I'm going to point out every time your support of a porn author who would seem to be involved in voter fraud. The pot should not call the kettle black.

I have absolutely NO idea what you're talking about.

[talaniman]

Is the dufus "grab 'em by the p****y" porn talk, or is he the pot or the kettle, even if he ain't black? Could he be a liberal democrat? Or do you accept the dufus crap because he gives YOU something in return?

[jlisenbe]

Is the dufus "grab 'em by the p****y" porn talk, or is he the pot or the kettle, even if he ain't black? Could he be a liberal democrat? Or do you accept the dufus crap because he gives YOU something in return?

And there it is. If Trump makes a vulgar comment, then it must be hashed and rehashed endlessly. If Biden is very believingly accused of sexual assault, that gets swept under the rug. So it all still comes down to politics.

Then stop hassling me.

I haven't hassled you, WG. You have bragged about reading what you said is porn. Perhaps you are hassling yourself?

[Wondergirl]

And there it is. If Trump makes a vulgar comment, then it must be hashed and rehashed endlessly. If Biden is very believingly accused of sexual assault, that gets swept under the rug. So it all still comes down to politics.

Trump has made numerous vulgar comments and carried on a number of lewd activities, all of which he's publicly bragged about.

I haven't hassled you, WG. You have bragged about reading what you said is porn. Perhaps you are hassling yourself?

I bragged about it??? I have explained to you the difference between porn and soft porn. You are not a comprehensive reader

[jlisenbe]

I bragged about it??? I have explained to you the difference between porn and soft porn. You are not a comprehensive reader.

Yeah. Here's your bragging. "You've just given me a new author! Thank you!!!

Oops, I've already discovered her. I have a couple of her books on my Kindle, but haven't read them yet. Now I know what I'll be doing this weekend. And it's soft porn..."

Basically, if you read it, then you seem to believe it surely must be some form of porn called "soft porn". Isn't that kind of like saying a person only engages in "soft racism", or he/she only engages in "soft sexual assault"? I don't like exposing myself to those thoughts and mental images, so I avoid it. But you can read what you like. You told everyone you read porn (soft porn) and now you seem sensitive about. I don't want to concern myself with it since it is really your business and not mine. Let's just drop it.

[Wondergirl]

Let's just drop it.

You said it was porn. I corrected you and explained the difference between porn and soft porn. You refuse to see the difference. Playmate magazine is porn. X-rated movies usually include porn. Sorry you don't know what porn is.

[talaniman]

And there it is. If Trump makes a vulgar comment, then it must be hashed and rehashed endlessly. If Biden is very believingly accused of sexual assault, that gets swept under the rug. So it all still comes down to politics.

Yep politics and COURT CASES!

List of Trump's accusers and their allegations of sexual misconduct - ABC News (go.com)

Credible EVIDENCE before a judge doesn't get swept under a rug. What do you think the dufus is still raising money for?

Trump’s ‘Save America’ PAC Could Pay For Big Macs, Hush Money … Pretty Much Anything (yahoo.com)

PS

Sorry haven't finished reviewing the civil case against the dufus family for the inauguration...!

[jlisenbe]

You refuse to see the difference. Playmate magazine is porn. X-rated movies usually include porn. Sorry you don't know what porn is.

Since you are the one who reads it, then I suppose you think you get to set the definitions. Sorry. I won't fall for that one. It's like allowing a white supremacist to decide what soft racism is.

But for the third time, do as you please. If you don't want everyone to know, then don't announce it on a message board.

Hey, Tal. Don't forget about your hero, the pres elect.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/8-wom...riate-touching

[Wondergirl]

Since you are the one who reads it, then I suppose you think you get to set the definitions. Sorry. I won't fall for that one. It's like allowing a white supremacist to decide what soft racism is.

You're still sooooo confused!

I also read westerns, fantasies, general fiction, thrillers, mysteries, and YA novels. Btw, the definitions of porn and soft porn are google-able.

[jlisenbe]

I also read westerns, fantasies, general fiction, thrillers, mysteries, and YA novels. Btw, the definitions of porn and soft porn are google-able.

Soft porn is still porn and is based on vivid descriptions of sex. Your definition is basically that if you read it, and if it's written by a liberal dem, then it must be OK. Well, I've read samples of SA's work, and yeah, it's porn. I suppose you get a kick out of it, or whatever, but as for what you read, for the fourth time, it's strictly your business and I see no reason why we need to discuss it here other than you continue to bring it up in a vain attempt to make your reading of porn, and your support of a porn author, to seem OK.

BTW, I understand the difference between porn and soft porn. I just don't find it to be meaningful since they are both based on alluring descriptions of sex. It's like saying there is a difference between being drunk versus only soft drunk. And what SA writes is pretty detailed and descriptive in any case, or at least the samples I have looked at certainly are. I would not be able to read a book like that and have any sense that God found my doing so to be pleasing in His sight.

[talaniman]

Do you think your God is pleased with your support of a nasty talking fellow who lears at naked young girls?

[jlisenbe]

I don't support Biden. You know, the guy accused by eight women of sexual assault?

Look, you and I both know that we had two choices in the last two elections, and those were bad and mediocre. So I went with the guy who opposed abortion and promised to appoint fed judges who valued the Constitution. So yes, I think it pleases God immensely to stand against the murder of innocent, unborn human beings. Your playing the part of Mr. Pot to my Mr. Kettle gets tiresome.

[tomder55]

hmmm SCOTUS and porn . In the words of Justice Potter Stewart :

"I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description ["hard-core pornography"], and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it..."

[talaniman]

I don't support Biden. You know, the guy accused by eight women of sexual assault?

Look, you and I both know that we had two choices in the last two elections, and those were bad and mediocre. So I went with the guy who opposed abortion and promised to appoint fed judges who valued the Constitution. So yes, I think it pleases God immensely to stand against the murder of innocent, unborn human beings. Your playing the part of Mr. Pot to my Mr. Kettle gets tiresome.

Forget the cookware dude, are you not concerned about almost 3,000 deaths a day, and that's not counting what the toll will be when the holiday numbers are realized. Your personal peeves pale when you look at a big picture and it's disgusting your concern is making sure the dufus gets credit for his incompetence that leads to those rapidly rising numbers of sickness and death.

Not to mention the continuing erosion of the economy by covid.

[jlisenbe]

Forget the cookware dude, are you not concerned about almost 3,000 deaths a day, and that's not counting what the toll will be when the holiday numbers are realized. Your personal peeves pale when you look at a big picture and it's disgusting your concern is making sure the dufus gets credit for his incompetence that leads to those rapidly rising numbers of sickness and death.

3K deaths a day? How appropriate that that number is about the number of abortions a day that you couldn't care less about. Well, I've asked you twice as to what else we should be doing that is not presently being done about Covid, and you've passed on the question both times. We test more people by far than any other country, and we have developed a vaccine in record time. I'm sure you've just forgotten to give Trump credit for that, and recognized how many lives have been saved, and will be saved, by those two measures?

As to the economy, you are clearly not paying attention in even the smallest measure.