[talaniman]

That's what is wrong with your approach. You love Obama, so you wouldn't let wild horses drag a negative comment about him out of your mouth. You hate Trump, so you refuse to acknowledge anything positive about him. It's that inconsistency that I object to. Your moral outrage makes no impression because of it.

I don't remember you or the RWing saying positive things about Obama, quite the opposite, so is that hate for Obama? Why do you expect the left to do what you didn't do? That was the question.

Now to answer your question, it is certainly not OK for conservatives to allow Trump to "get away with" illegal behavior. However, at some point you have to actually come up with illegal behavior. We've gone through a bogus impeachment hearing and a bogus Atlantic article. You've come up with nothing, but you want to continue your whining campaign against the pres in the hope that you can get Biden elected. That's thoroughly dishonest, and that's why I call you out on it.

So we are dishonest for whining about the dufus, but it's okay for you to whine about Biden, and that's not thoroughly dishonest? If you can be partisan why can't we? Your approach has as many flaws as mine does. We both want our guys elected. Your inconsistent moral outrage is as partisan as mine. Mine is just a lot more CURRENT!

[jlisenbe]

You can whine all you want. No problem with that. But it's the holier than thou pontificating about Trump's supposedly illegal behavior that should be backed up by some evidence.

Partisanship? Maybe. I'd probably be more likely to refer to it as issues based voting. I'll vote for anyone of either party that will agree to appoint fed judges who believe in interpreting law rather than making laws up, and who can help maintain a healthy economy. I would add something about a balanced budget, but that is presently hopeless. We'll just have to learn the hard way.

[talaniman]

Nobody here has a more holier than thou attitude than thee, but so what? It's yours to have and no big deal for me.