Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #1

    May 4, 2010, 07:43 AM
    NYC Time Square terrorist attack... what a maroon!
    No ;I'm not talking about the attempted bomber Faisal Shahzad . He successfully deployed a VBIED in the middle of Manhattan exactly where he planned to detonate it. Like with the Christmas underpants bomber attempt,it was just plain luck ,and the vigilance of alert civilians that the detonation failed.
    I can speculate that our attacks on training camps have reduced the jihadist's ability to competently train their operatives. But it has not prevented them from making the attempts.

    What I mean by the OP header is the stupid speculations I've read in the past couple days as to who the attacker might be.

    Take as an example this idiot Robert Dreyfuss from the Nation who said
    “it seems far more likely to me that the perpetrator of the bungled Times Square bomb plot was either a lone nut job or a member of some squirrely branch of the Tea Party, anti-government far right.”.
    A Connecticut Taliban in Bloomberg's Court? | The Nation

    Or this fine bit of journalism by Jason Levin of Election Ink.

    “Anonymous sources have reported that a suspect is currently being questioned in the Bridgeport / New Haven CT area. The suspect is a middle age white male, has a history of strong political views, and considers himself a Tea Party activist. An arrest is expected within days. In a strange twist, the suspect worked in the past as an informant with law enforcement agencies.”

    Election Ink - Tea Party Movement possibly involved in Times Square SUV bomb

    Even Mayor Bloomberg got into the act saying that the bomber could be someone upset over the Health Care bill that was passed. He told Katie Couric
    “If I had to guess 25 cents, this would be exactly that. Homegrown, or maybe a mentally deranged person, or somebody with a political agenda that doesn't like the health care bill or something. It could be anything.”


    Hello!! NY City has been a constant target of the jihadists movement for 20 years or more . Oh wait ,let me guess . It couldn't be Muslim terrorists ;it must be Yankee haters. Yeah that's the ticket.
    Hard to defeat an enemy you refuse to name.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #2

    May 4, 2010, 08:44 AM
    Those darn tea-baggers brought it on themselves with all that violence and incitement. Oh wait, those were immigration protesters.

    I do have to point out the "tea-baggers," as even Obama calls them now, are the named enemy.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #3

    May 4, 2010, 09:53 AM

    Bloomberg was on the radio warning us NYers against backlash even though there is absolutely no indication that there was a threat of it.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #4

    May 4, 2010, 10:00 AM

    I emailed this OP to some friends and got back this reply :

    The suspect is a middle age white male, has a history of strong political views
    The best guess I’ve heard was Bill Ayers. He has a history of making and detonating bombs in America, is white and middle aged.
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #5

    May 4, 2010, 10:24 AM

    Hello tom:

    Here's what right winger Jonah Goldberg has to say. He's thrilled that the man arrested is a proper foreign-born Muslim dude, and not a God-fearing white Christian. He admits as much:

    "When the Times Square story first broke there was a part of me that said, "Man, I hope it's not some white militia nutjob." When I saw the news this morning that it was a Pakistani, the same small part of me was relieved."

    A normal human might be relieved that the person responsible for the attempted bombing is in custody. This winger is just relieved that his prejudices against Muslims were reinforced.

    excon
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #6

    May 4, 2010, 10:25 AM

    You mean like the backlash in NYC after 9/11? You mean there wasn't one?

    He should be warning New Yorkers against traveling to AZ shouldn't he?
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #7

    May 4, 2010, 10:51 AM

    Ex I do not represent Goldberg's thoughts nor he mine.

    This is what I think . I was in Time Square the week before watching a play on Broadway ,and my daughter frequently goes into town with her friends. I take attempts to harm me and my family personally.

    A Pakistani group took credit for the attack before the arrest . The bomber is a Pakistani . Now I hear someone else was detained in Karachi.

    The jihadists have told us in unambiguous terms their intent to attack and kill us .They have repeatedly attacked and attempted attacks inside NYC. (there is an irony in that itself in that NYC is a liberal bastion of "tolerence " for their view of the world ) .

    I have heard no such thoughts from tea partiers exercising their right to peacefully demonstrate against their government's policies and actions. They don't threaten to kill those who don't adhere to their views.

    I take both groups at their word.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #8

    May 4, 2010, 10:56 AM
    MSNBC's Contessa Brewer admitted her frustration that the Times Square bomber turned out to be a Muslim.

    "I get frustrated...There was part of me that was hoping this was not going to be anybody with ties to any kind of Islamic country."

    And in a supreme bit of irony she added, "...There are a lot of people who want to use terrorist intent to justify writing off people who believe in a certain way or come from certain countries or whose skin color is a certain way. I mean they use it as justification for really outdated bigotry."

    Fortunately no one in the media (or running our government) ever "use terrorist intent to justify writing off people who believe in a certain way," etc.
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #9

    May 4, 2010, 11:19 AM

    Ex, that's a fine misrepresentation of what Goldberg said. Unfortunately for you I had already read his post in context. What he was saying, after admitting he felt some sense of relief it wasn't a "tea-bagger" as our president now calls them, was that his conclusion was at least justified by empirical evidence as opposed to the jerking knees and true hopes of liberals wishing it were a "tea-bagger."

    His point is while the left's bullying us into silence over the alleged threat we pose is "dangerous because it causes the country to look for terrorists where they aren’t while telling them not to look for them where they are."

    He's right, and instead of commending him for his honesty you're trying to do just that, tell people here where to look for the bad guys where they aren't instead of where they are.
    spitvenom's Avatar
    spitvenom Posts: 1,266, Reputation: 373
    Ultra Member
     
    #10

    May 4, 2010, 11:39 AM

    Speech to be fair they called themselves teabaggers first. Then when someone pointed out what a teabagger was then they got offended. Grandma worked a long time on that tea bagging for Jesus sign Protestors Now Teabagging for Jesus [PIC]

    But anyway I knew it wasn't a white person from the start. Liberals are to lazy to do something like this. And the tea baggers are all old people.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #11

    May 4, 2010, 11:46 AM

    Just don't jump onto the ball field in Philly or you are in for the shock of your life.
    spitvenom's Avatar
    spitvenom Posts: 1,266, Reputation: 373
    Ultra Member
     
    #12

    May 4, 2010, 11:58 AM

    How crazy was that Tom, have you seen the video? But it didn't look so bad and he got right up. I hate when people run onto the field. Remember a few years ago when the Father and Son at the white sox game ran onto the field and beat up the first base coach?
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #13

    May 4, 2010, 12:36 PM

    Been a little rougher than usual at the games in Philly, eh? At least no one was intentionally puked on were they?
    spitvenom's Avatar
    spitvenom Posts: 1,266, Reputation: 373
    Ultra Member
     
    #14

    May 4, 2010, 01:06 PM

    Speech that guy was from Jersey who puked on the off duty cop and his family. I expect this at Eagles games but not at the Phillies. It is always the herbs from the suburbs that do this stuff.
    galveston's Avatar
    galveston Posts: 451, Reputation: 60
    Full Member
     
    #15

    May 4, 2010, 04:22 PM

    Pointing the blame in the wrong direction has been the SOP for the brain dead media for a long time.

    I was listening to the radio when the news first broke that Kennedy had been shot in Dallas.

    What was the first thing the news morons did? They quickly pointed out that Dallas is a conservative town and that the conservative view point was responsible for this terrible act.

    Of course, when the actual shooter was caught, they couldn't sell that lie, because I don't ever remember anyone calling Oswald a conservative.

    But these ill conceived purveyors of public pablum have seared consciences and hope we have short memories.

    Thank God for Fox news and the internet where we can actually get more than one opinion on any given subject.
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #16

    May 4, 2010, 04:29 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post


    Hello !!! NY City has been a constant target of the jihadists movement for 20 years or more . Oh wait ,let me guess . It couldn't be Muslim terrorists ;it must be Yankee haters. yeah that's the ticket.
    Hard to defeat an enemy you refuse to name.
    This is where being politically correct finally gets you, you can use the word Muslim, how do you know he was a muslim? The Pakistani's tell you they did it and you don't believe them because it's racist to accuse the Pakistani's.

    We have it seems a pecular learning difficulty. Pakistani's have been implicated in many terror attacks. There is a terrorist organisation in Pakistan bombing the crap out of their own people. I think we should jump to conclusions and expect the bomber to come from Pakistan
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #17

    May 5, 2010, 03:22 AM

    Considering the planners of both the WTC attack 1993 and 9-11 were both Pakis you would think our guard would be up.

    This attack explodes some myths for sure. I already dissected the racist white guy upset with Obamacare myth.

    There is another one that says Muslim immigrants once integrated do not become violent jihadist threats. The only signal Shahzad sent was his travels to Pakistan. But identifying him in that manner would've been profiling .
    inthebox's Avatar
    inthebox Posts: 787, Reputation: 179
    Senior Member
     
    #18

    May 5, 2010, 05:21 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Hello tom:

    Here's what right winger Jonah Goldberg has to say. He's thrilled that the man arrested is a proper foreign-born Muslim dude, and not a God-fearing white Christian. He admits as much:

    "When the Times Square story first broke there was a part of me that said, "Man, I hope it's not some white militia nutjob." When I saw the news this morning that it was a Pakistani, the same small part of me was relieved."

    A normal human might be relieved that the person responsible for the attempted bombing is in custody. This winger is just relieved that his prejudices against Muslims were reinforced.

    excon

    If we are really honest with ourselves, we see ourselves as belonging to certain groups: by race, religion, gender, age, political beliefs etc...
    Of course the liberals act this way though they try not to admit it
    That being said; The place I work at is very diverse. When this story broke and before the surveillance video came out, a black co-worker had no problem saying," man, I hope they aren't black." The same sentiment that Goldberg has from the perspective of a white male. The same perspective I have as an American Asian. We would be mortified if it was a member of a group we identify with. When Tiller was killed there was an immediate repudiation by plenty of anti-abortion groups.

    Where are the Muslim and or Pakistani groups repudiating this man's attempts?





    G&P





    G&P
    excon's Avatar
    excon Posts: 21,482, Reputation: 2992
    Uber Member
     
    #19

    May 5, 2010, 05:24 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    The only signal Shahzad sent was his travels to Pakistan. But identifying him in that manner would've been profiling .
    Hello again, tom:

    You can't tell the difference between behavioral profiling and racial profiling... It figures.

    excon
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #20

    May 5, 2010, 05:30 AM

    But if a cop asks for the id.of Mexican waiting on the corner to be picked up for work in Arizona that isn't behavioral profiling but racial ?

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

Yellow and maroon capsule [ 1 Answers ]

Yellow and maroon capsule with letters GS JVL on it.

New Years Eve at Time Square [ 6 Answers ]

If you don't want to wait until ABC joins the fun you can watch a live stream of the festivities here The Official New Year's Eve in Times Square Homepage The party has already started Happy New Year!!

Terrorist attack on China [ 5 Answers ]

Just wondering what you intelligent people think would happen should an Islamic terrorist group made an attack on China during their time to shine? I'm just interested to know what you guys & gals who have knowledge (or at least appear to :D ) in world affairs think the Chinese reaction would...

NYC Part-Time Resident Tax [ 2 Answers ]

I live in NJ. But I had moved with a friend of mine in Manhattan for about 4 months. I worked in NYC for about 3 months. I got a job in NJ and eventually moved back to NJ. I think as my stay was less than 180 days, I would not be classified as a NY resident. Or Would I? Would I be classified...

Live part-time NYC and work full-time and live part-timein Long Island am I NYC resi [ 1 Answers ]

For all of 2007, I lived and worked in Suffolk County four days per week, and I lived in the Bronx three days per week (not working during those three days). My employer generated my w-2 form with non-resident status based on my working and living in Suffolk County for my emploment. My question is,...


View more questions Search