Search:
Type: Posts; User: jlisenbe
Search:
Search took 0.14 seconds.
-
Paid for, of course, with more fantasy money.
-
More of interest.
It's interesting to me that the Court in the Roe decision could appeal to the "liberty" interest in the 14th amendment and yet be appallingly uninterested in the "life"...
-
More compelling reason from the abortion decision.
-
Different subject, but the decision which came out today against the school district which attempted to suppress a coach's right to exercise his religious faith is another victory for freedom.
-
In reference to the Casey opinion, Alito said this. "But the opinionconcluded that stare decisis, which calls for prior decisionsto be followed in most instances, required adherence towhat it called...
-
The tolerant, peace-loving leftists are busy burning and destroying. Shame. Crisis pregnancy centers, basically run only by pro-lifers, are being targeted.
-
I think they missed it in a major way. Life cannot be taken without due process of law. On that basis, abortion as practiced now should be outlawed.
-
I'd probably give it a couple more weeks to see if it will clear up on its own. Beyond that, I can't help but wonder if someone didn't accidentally try to flush some sort of soap bar down the toilet...
-
A few questions.
1. Does this foaming occur anywhere else, or is it just this one toilet only?
2. Are these bubbles in the tank, the bowl, or both?
3. Other than being peculiar, is it causing...
-
Already asked and answered.
THIS question, on the other hand, you have consistently dodged. Please answer it now. "Given a choice between adoption and killing the child, which do you...
-
Saw this post on FB today. Reminded me of our discussion about adoption.
-
-
-
Which one?
You referred to adoptions with a "gag". That's pretty sickening. It was your term. Truth is, you prefer to see them killed in abortions.
Here is the question again. Still dodging?...
-
Adoptions "gag" you? Wow. I knew a lot of adopted kids and I never had that thought about them.
You dodged the question. That's why I suggested you are fearful. Besides, you must have missed...
-
Babies are adopted or put into foster care, facts known to everyone including you. Only the titanically ignorant would not know that. I trust you do not belong in that category.
Now obstinate and...
-
What currently happens?
I'm not putting you down. If you will read post 104 even semi-carefully, you will have some material to respond to.
-
And again. "There are really only two choices. You can kill the baby or allow the baby to live. The first choice seems ghastly to me. I can only assume WG is ok with it. Go figure."
And again. "...
-
There are really only two choices. You can kill the baby or allow the baby to live. The first choice seems ghastly to me. I can only assume WG is ok with it. Go figure.
-
Good answer from Tom. I still don't know where WG is going with this. As to your comment about the newborn's mother, I've already answered that. Posts 103 and 104. Please keep up.
-
I'm really not sure where you are going with this. Killing the baby because we don't like it's method of conception seems like a bad plan to me. Is that what you are suggesting? If so, then when are...
-
I would suggest that we make adoption a much less expensive and time-consuming process. It would also be wise to develop a national attitude that if you have a baby, you are expected to take care of...
-
Well, I suppose that we could just kill them after they are born if no one wants them. After all, killing is killing, isn't it? One practice is no more heartless, cruel, sadistic, and cold-hearted...
-
It's amazing how many wonderful excuses liberal dems (and, rather sadly, some repubs) can come up with to justify the killing of innocent human beings. It is going down the same road Germany went...
-
You claimed, "And even before that when women were men's property because, after all, it says in Genesis that a wife should, Stepford style, cleave to her husband as the head of the house." That is...
-
You were wrong. Period. Women are not owned and it does not say, as you falsely claimed, that wives “cleave”. Nonsense.
But since we are again in non-literal territory, I understand you to be...
-
To be clear, wives and husbands are to cleave to each other in the sense of being faithful to each other, to cling to each other, but it is not just for the wife, and it is only stated as such for...
-
You go from confident assertions to insecure questions. I guess that’s progress, but still no support for women being owned by their husbands or wives cleaving to husbands.
Tom, Reagan had it...
-
I have a big problem with people who make claims that clearly are untrue and are too unspeakably arrogant to simply admit it. You claimed that husbands own their wives and that the wives are to...
-
I knew it was too much to hope for. This statement, "And even before that when women were men's property because, after all, it says in Genesis that a wife should, Stepford style, cleave to her...
-
You've got it backwards. It actually says this. "Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh." So note that the husband actually...
-
-
That's not what the SCOTUS decision referred to.
-
We're going to find out now, almost certainly by this evening, how wonderfully tolerant and peace-loving the advocates of killing unborn babies are.
-
You are speculating again. There are many women who chose to keep their babies, the products of rape, and testify that it was a gloriously wonderful decision that they are happy they made. Doing the...
-
Yes, she will. She will do the right thing, thank God. It is certainly far preferred to having a living human being, innocent and defenseless, destroyed right before her eyes.
-
About fifty years too late, but justice is finally beginning to take place. Thank you Mr. Trump for your SCOTUS appointees who genuinely believe in the rule of law rather than just making it up as...
-
I wouldn't say this is 100% accurate, but it's close enough. How far we have fallen!
49375
-
C. Thomas put it pretty well.
-
You mean the criminals didn't stop and think, "Wait a minute. I can't rob this convenience store. After all, the gun I'm using might need discharging, and that's against the law. I'll have to just...
-
One would think that the right to keep and bear arms would automatically lead to the right to discharge such weapons. Otherwise, what would be the point of having them?
-
Interesting SC decision today. New York cannot prohibit concealed carry because the applicant cannot demonstrate a personal danger. I don't know how far that opens the door, but it would seem to be...
-
Career politician. Say what makes the most people happy.
-
Recent mass shootings, including those at a Texas elementary school and a New York supermarket, have renewed public attention on President Joe Biden’s views on gun control. An array of recent...
-
-
The great red wave seems to be a likely event, but even at that we will still end up in mostly political deadlock. The WH must be changed.
If the repubs take over the Congress, they need to hold...
-
There were many mistakes made, the propped-open door being one of the biggest.
-
There probably is a greater prospect of gain among Hispanics than among black Americans. Perhaps not, but the attachment to the dem party with blacks is very strong.
-
Crime desperately needs to be addressed, but that means more arrests, more violent confrontations between criminals and the cops, and increased prison pops, all of which feeds into a narrative dearly...
-
The opportunity certainly seems to exist to turn a significant number of minority votes to the republican side. What specifically do you think repubs should do to facilitate that?
|