Statisticallychallenged
May 6, 2007, 09:21 PM
:eek: B. Broderick was tried for multiple crimes. A forensic expert testified that based on blood samples taken from the crime scene, the assilant had type B blood characteristics and a unique genetic marker. She reported that only 0.32 % of the population of the county had these blood characteristics and that Broderick had blood type B and the genetic marker.
If I define events G and E as following:
G= Broderick is guilty of the crimes
E= Evidence at crime scenes is type B and has the genetic marker
Circumstantial evidence about this case makes me think that P(G) is 0.10 (subjective probability). Given the forensic eveidence, what is the probability that Broderick is guilty?
While a 10% probability of guilt is not "beyond a reasonable doubt" what happens to the probabilty after accounting the forensic eveidence?
HINTS:
1. P(E,given G)=1. If Broderick did the crime then the evidence would certainly be type B blood with genetic marker
2. Argue that P9E, given not G)= 0.0032
3. Use the subjective quilt probability P(G)=0.10 and the probabilities in the previous hints to compute P(G, given E), the probability of guilt given the evidence.
YIKES!! HOPEFULLY SOMEONE OUT THERE KNOWS HOW TO MAKE SENSE OF THIS MONSTER OF A QUESTION!!
If I define events G and E as following:
G= Broderick is guilty of the crimes
E= Evidence at crime scenes is type B and has the genetic marker
Circumstantial evidence about this case makes me think that P(G) is 0.10 (subjective probability). Given the forensic eveidence, what is the probability that Broderick is guilty?
While a 10% probability of guilt is not "beyond a reasonable doubt" what happens to the probabilty after accounting the forensic eveidence?
HINTS:
1. P(E,given G)=1. If Broderick did the crime then the evidence would certainly be type B blood with genetic marker
2. Argue that P9E, given not G)= 0.0032
3. Use the subjective quilt probability P(G)=0.10 and the probabilities in the previous hints to compute P(G, given E), the probability of guilt given the evidence.
YIKES!! HOPEFULLY SOMEONE OUT THERE KNOWS HOW TO MAKE SENSE OF THIS MONSTER OF A QUESTION!!