This is a festering story that the Brit media sorta made an issue of and then covered it up in silence.

Elon Musk noticed it and raised the issue up to importance again.
There are gangs of Pakistani immigrants who roam the streets raping and assaulting girls and young women. There have been thousands of victims .

Public servants deal with it by turning a blind eye . Reports and complaints are not followed up.

Musk's post on the topic forces the Brit elite snobs to defend the undefendable .
The consequences could be the end if the Starmer reign.
MPs vote against Tory call for new grooming gangs inquiry (https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clyvy4q82l9o)

This is not a Tori Labour issue .

You see ;multiculturalism is more important than protecting women victims of rape and assault . This was going on during Rishi Sunak's term also . So it is the equivalent of the Brit swamp that is responsible for inaction

The beauty of X is that this stuff cannot be covered up anymore . All Musk does is retweet other poster's contributions.

Just as people in LA are calling out politicians with information reported on X ;soon the Brits will have to deal with their own people .
No wonder the elites in England want to throw Musk in jail.

A couple of observations.

1. This is what happens when the populace is denied the right of self-defense inherent in keeping and bearing arms.

2. What a low point in women's rights have been reached. First there is the trans debacle in women's sports, and now the Brits allow women to be raped with impunity so long as the rapist is Pakistani. The women would be in a much better situation if the assaulters were white, MAGA conservatives, or even better yet, were employees of Fox News.

Time to expand this discussion because this becomes a connect the dots opportunity . This is much more than a bunch of rape gangs . This is about censorship here and in the free world. It is about the importance of free speech and how far so called free nations will go to suppress it . It is about the threats against Musk by the deep states of these nations . It is about the importance of Zuck converting from the dark side.It is why it was crucial to elect Trump and how close we came to permanently losing our speech rights.

Let's start with Zuckerberg . His statement about the future of Meta is much more than fact checking .

Here are excerpts of his statement


The recent elections also feel like a cultural tipping point towards, once again, prioritizing speech. So, we're going to get back to our roots and focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our policies, and restoring free expression on our platforms..........What started as a movement to be more inclusive has increasingly been used to shut down opinions and shut out people with different ideas, and it's gone too far. So, I want to make sure that people can share their beliefs and experiences on our platforms...........Finally, we're going to work with President Trump to push back on governments around the world. They're going after American companies and pushing to censor more. The US has the strongest constitutional protections for free expression in the world. Europe has an ever-increasing number of laws, institutionalizing censorship, and making it difficult to build anything innovative there. Latin American countries have secret courts that can order companies to quietly take things down. China has censored our apps from even working in the country. The only way that we can push back on this global trend is with the support of the US government, and that's why it's been so difficult over the past four years when even the US government has pushed for censorship.
By going after us and other American companies, it has emboldened other governments to go even further. But now we have the opportunity to restore free expression, and I'm excited to take it. It'll take time to get this right, and these are complex systems. They're never going to be perfect. There's also a lot of illegal stuff that we still need to work very hard to remove. But the bottom line is that after years of having our content moderation work focused primarily on removing content, it is time to focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our systems, and getting back to our roots about giving people voice. I'm looking forward to this next chapter. Stay good out there, and more to come soon.


Transcript: Mark Zuckerberg Announces Major Changes to Meta's Content Moderation Policies and Operations | TechPolicy.Press (https://www.techpolicy.press/transcript-mark-zuckerberg-announces-major-changes-to-metas-content-moderation-policies-and-operations/)

Think back to the election . I noted that the Brits sent a team here to interfere in our election to help get Kam the Sham elected I also noted then about the Brits determination to extradite Musk.

Will Kam the Sham allow censorship to be enforced by Great Britain ? (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/current-events/will-kam-sham-allow-censorship-enforced-great-britain-852047.html)

Their top prosecutor Stephen Parkinson told us that anyone in the US who violated their standards of the " Online Safety Act" had "nowhere to hide "


“Some people are abroad. That doesn't mean they're safe. We have liaison prosecutors around the globe, who've got local links with the local judiciary. We can cooperate with our international partners.
“We would certainly consider extradition if we are satisfied that an offence has been committed.
“And if it takes weeks or not months, we will bring them home and they will face justice.”



'Nowhere to hide' for influencers behind disorder - top prosecutor (https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c75nn9dr0rvo)

Tech giants told UK online safety laws ‘not up for negotiation’ | Artificial intelligence (AI) | The Guardian (https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jan/11/tech-giants-told-uk-online-safety-laws-not-up-for-negotiation#:~:text=Under%20the%20Online%20Safety% 20Act,they%20choose%20to%20do%20so.)


And it is not only extradition and jail like what happened to the Telegram CEO . Musk was forced to retreat when Brazil threatened the seizure of his assets . The EU threatened him with the seizure of 6% of his revenue.

Days ago Musk interviewed German candidate Alice Weidel . The EU warned him that if he posted it then he would be violating their standards of censorship under their Digital Services Act (DSA) .

Weidel-Musk X interview legal but could influence Commission’s DSA investigation - Euractiv (https://www.euractiv.com/section/tech/news/weidel-musk-x-interview-legal-but-could-influence-commissions-dsa-investigation/)

They had 150 speech monitors observing .
Brussels will be watching whether Musk breaks EU law in far-right livestream – POLITICO (https://www.politico.eu/article/elon-musk-alice-weidel-alternative-for-germany-x-interview-eu-big-tech-regulation/)

Clueless Joe and Kam the Sham were all in on the global censorship and that is why the Brits were so interested in helping her secure the win; so they could maintain their deep state control of information like these rape gangs.

Labour staff campaigning for Kamala Harris were offered hotel accommodation by Democrats (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/politics/2024/10/24/labour-election-democrat-harris-trump-starmer/)

Recently our deep state tried a last ditch effort to keep the Industrial Censorship Complex in place .

A House majority divide against itself cannot stand - Page 2 (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/showthread.php?t=851036&page=2&p=3899302#post3899302)

Posters on X rallied and forced Speak Johnson and the Repubs to cut funding of the program at the 11th hour .

State Department 'censorship' office cut from spenthis ding bill - Washington Examiner (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/3266181/funding-global-engagement-center-cut-spending-bill-gop-backlash/)

We came that close and only one social media company unbound by government control stopped it .

That is why Zuckerberg's conversion (if it is true) is so critical. The "Metaverse " is so much more influential than X ;and combined they could be the center of gravity for America exporting one of it's most important values to the world. Presidents from Jimmy Carter to Ronald Reagan (and before them our nation's framers) believed it was important to make this a central plank of our foreign relations.


But even our staunchest ally may be willing to cut ties with us over this issue. Nicholas Watt ;a BBC lackey for the government threatened US -UK special relationship over Musk



"This is not over. There is horror at the highest levels of government at the incendiary language we have seen from Elon Musk" "There's going to be a hard headed assessment. Is this just the view of Elon Musk, or, is it the view of the wider administration and Donald Trump""If it's the latter there will be some serious questions about our ongoing security partnership with the US"

(1) Video | Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1109642454290901)

and all because Musk brought to light a Brit coverup .