tomder55
Aug 17, 2022, 05:16 AM
You know and I know that the REAL reason for the raid on Mar a Lago had nothing to do with violations of the Presidential records act ,classified docs being stored securely on site or nuclear secretes that could imperil American security .
The REAL reason for the raid is to assist the Kangaroo court in it's investigation of January 6 2021 so they can ultimately give recommendations for indictment of Trump for the allegation that he led a coup attempt yada yada
However ; the 5th Amendment ;like the 4th Amendment that I have already mentioned in another post ,is unambiguous in it's constitutional protections .
It reads
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
The thing is ,Trump has already been tried for Jan 6. The House Impeached him and a trial was held in the Senate.This happened between January 6 and 20,2021.
Yes the trial was held in Congress instead of the courts .It was still a trial . Nothing in the constitution suggests that a trial in the courts would not constitute double jeopardy after an impeachment acquittal . If the real reason for the raid was to find evidence connecting him to Jan 6 then it must be thrown out of court .
The REAL reason for the raid is to assist the Kangaroo court in it's investigation of January 6 2021 so they can ultimately give recommendations for indictment of Trump for the allegation that he led a coup attempt yada yada
However ; the 5th Amendment ;like the 4th Amendment that I have already mentioned in another post ,is unambiguous in it's constitutional protections .
It reads
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
The thing is ,Trump has already been tried for Jan 6. The House Impeached him and a trial was held in the Senate.This happened between January 6 and 20,2021.
Yes the trial was held in Congress instead of the courts .It was still a trial . Nothing in the constitution suggests that a trial in the courts would not constitute double jeopardy after an impeachment acquittal . If the real reason for the raid was to find evidence connecting him to Jan 6 then it must be thrown out of court .