tomder55
Nov 17, 2021, 03:50 AM
Now that COP26 is over and the world leaders hopped on their carbon emitting jets to return home ,it is useful to see what was pledged because it is frankly mind boggling .
Are you ready for this ? $130 TRILLION was pledged with the goal of converting the world to carbon free energy and elimination of fossil fuel technology. More than 135% of the world GDP was pledged (which is around $80 trillion today) .
Sovereign states do not have the resources ;even taking into account severe confiscatory taxation progressive states practice now . So who exactly will pick up the tab?
As always ,this utopian dream depends on capitalism if it has any chance of success. Not to worry . That 'sell them the rope to hang themselves' quip still holds true . All it takes is a few government mandates and some empty promise of profitability and the sheep in the financial industry, that gets vilified by the left, can't wait to get on the rent seeker's conga line .
To raise that type of capital requires banks . Remember when Ike cautioned about the defense industrial complex ? Welcome the Green New Deal Industrial complex . Wall Street is orgasmic to get on board .They saw what was happening at Glasgow and couldn't wait for the jets to land before pledging to fund this brave new world .It's no accident that most of the CEOs and employees of large Wall Street firms are heavy Democrat donator. Heavy regulation serves as a barrier to entry into their businesses, and preserves their hegemony over capital.
There is a crazy pretty much debunked economic theory that says that if you break your perfectly good windows you help the economy because the windows have to be replaced . This is the theory deployed here . Breaking the functional energy assets in existence today to be replaced by $130 Trillion represents money that cannot be invested elsewhere . The economic costs are the needed investments not made as a greater percentage of wealth is tied up replacing assets that did not need to be replaced .
Who will pay the costs ? Wall Street's investments will be paid by the individual and the Main Street businesses .A greater percentage of capital will be devoted to this enterprise and there will be less available capital to any other investment ;and the costs will skyrocket .
The transition to a cleaner energy is probably inevitable .[Whether it is possible is a whole other issue . My own opinion is that until the flex capacitor or fusion energy is developed then fossil fuels will be required because renewables are not a reliable source to fuel a 21st century economy ].Market forces at work would enable the saner gradual transition . Government mandates always distorts markets .And this will be no exception to that rule.
During Ike's warning to the nation about the military industrial complex his less quoted comment was :
"“The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded. Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”
He was right then and he is still right .
Are you ready for this ? $130 TRILLION was pledged with the goal of converting the world to carbon free energy and elimination of fossil fuel technology. More than 135% of the world GDP was pledged (which is around $80 trillion today) .
Sovereign states do not have the resources ;even taking into account severe confiscatory taxation progressive states practice now . So who exactly will pick up the tab?
As always ,this utopian dream depends on capitalism if it has any chance of success. Not to worry . That 'sell them the rope to hang themselves' quip still holds true . All it takes is a few government mandates and some empty promise of profitability and the sheep in the financial industry, that gets vilified by the left, can't wait to get on the rent seeker's conga line .
To raise that type of capital requires banks . Remember when Ike cautioned about the defense industrial complex ? Welcome the Green New Deal Industrial complex . Wall Street is orgasmic to get on board .They saw what was happening at Glasgow and couldn't wait for the jets to land before pledging to fund this brave new world .It's no accident that most of the CEOs and employees of large Wall Street firms are heavy Democrat donator. Heavy regulation serves as a barrier to entry into their businesses, and preserves their hegemony over capital.
There is a crazy pretty much debunked economic theory that says that if you break your perfectly good windows you help the economy because the windows have to be replaced . This is the theory deployed here . Breaking the functional energy assets in existence today to be replaced by $130 Trillion represents money that cannot be invested elsewhere . The economic costs are the needed investments not made as a greater percentage of wealth is tied up replacing assets that did not need to be replaced .
Who will pay the costs ? Wall Street's investments will be paid by the individual and the Main Street businesses .A greater percentage of capital will be devoted to this enterprise and there will be less available capital to any other investment ;and the costs will skyrocket .
The transition to a cleaner energy is probably inevitable .[Whether it is possible is a whole other issue . My own opinion is that until the flex capacitor or fusion energy is developed then fossil fuels will be required because renewables are not a reliable source to fuel a 21st century economy ].Market forces at work would enable the saner gradual transition . Government mandates always distorts markets .And this will be no exception to that rule.
During Ike's warning to the nation about the military industrial complex his less quoted comment was :
"“The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded. Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”
He was right then and he is still right .