BLM's Hawk Newsome issued a warning to NYC Mayor elect Eric Adams. If he tries to enforce the law there will be riots, arson, and bloodshed.

What was the "anti-crime unit "? It was undercover cops who infiltrated gangs. Sandinista Bill got rid of it and of course violent crime increased.

BLM activists vow 'riots' if Adams reinstates NYPD anti-crime units - New York Daily News (nydailynews.com) (https://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/nyc-elections-2021/ny-blm-activists-threaten-riots-if-adams-reinstates-anti-crime-units-20211111-ssspwittbng6rd4xtr4odghkfe-story.html)


Sounds like domestic terrorism; or is that label reserved for parents concerned about their children's education?

"A Black Lives Matter leader vowed there’ll be “riots,” “fire” and “bloodshed” if Mayor-elect Eric Adams follows through with his promise to bring back plainclothes anti-crime cops to battle New York’s surge in violent crimes.

New York BLM co-founder Hawk Newsome debated the plan for a return to tougher policing with Adams during a contentious sit-down at Brooklyn Borough Hall Wednesday that was livestreamed on Instagram. (https://www.instagram.com/p/CWHFqkcFQrs/)"

With so many people here claiming to be concerned about insurrections, their eerie silence on this issue sure is strange.

https://nypost.com/2021/11/11/blm-leader-hawk-newsome-threatens-riots-after-sit-down-with-eric-adams/

For Adams this should be a wakeup call too. He was a participant in one of those graffiti fests .....oops I mean mural painting fest that painted "BLACK LIVES MATTER " on the street in front of Trump Tower

Black Lives Matter mural painted at Trump Tower, much to chagrin of the president | amNewYork (amny.com) (https://www.amny.com/news/black-lives-matter-mural-painted-at-trump-tower-much-to-chagrin-of-the-president/)

Amid speculation that Kyle Rittenhouse could be acquitted (https://nypost.com/2021/11/09/kyle-rittenhouse-looks-like-hes-headed-for-an-acquittal-legal-analyst/) of the most serious charges against him, Chicago appears to be bracing for riots that could accompany such a verdict.

Rittenhouse faces six charges, including two counts of first-degree homicide, in the shootings of three men, two fatally, last August amid rioting in Kenosha, Wisconsin. The 18-year-old from Antioch, Illinois has said he acted in self-defense.

The conduct of Judge Bruce Schroeder has raised the hackles of the family of Jacob Blake, whose police shooting (https://www.westernjournal.com/doj-wont-charge-wisconsin-cop-shot-jacob-blake-blake-reached-knife/) last year triggered the rioting that drew Rittenhouse to Kenosha, according to The Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/as-kyle-rittenhouse-trial-nears-end-judges-decisions-from-the-bench-come-under-scrutiny/2021/11/10/93cd45c6-3dad-11ec-9ef1-5cd499f0a123_story.html).

So do you suppose they are preparing for the conservative republicans? Are they preparing for the fundamentalist Christians, or the "white evangelicals"? Are they prepping for Trump supporters? I wonder who they seem to think will turn to rioting, otherwise known in many circles as "peaceful protestors"?


https://www.westernjournal.com/riot-fears-chicago-pd-cancels-days-off-officers-verdict-rittenhouse-trial-approaches/

do they realize that everyone he plugged was a white dude ?

That's beside the point. Pres Biden said he is a white supremacist, so I guess that settles it. Right???

Hopefully, this kid will sue Biden for defamation of character.

Kyle Outhouse did everything wrong. He made his mommy drive him to a city in another state, brought along and used an illegally obtained firearm, was underage to begin with, shudda been at home munching on caramel corn and watching cartoons with his puppy.

You might not agree with what he did, but he did not commit a crime. That's what the trial is about. And it's sad to see you call him "Kyle Outhouse". Pretty hateful thing to call a seventeen year old kid.

A seventeen year old home watching cartoons? Really?

You might not agree with what he did, but he did not commit a crime.
He committed murder!!! With an illegal weapon!!! That he had no business touching!!!

And it's sad to see you call him "Kyle Outhouse".
He earned the moniker. And that's what you do to everyone (even me) when they don't please you. Did you watch him sob piteously and occasionally peek out from under soggy lashes to see if the jury was watching him and being impressed?

A seventeen year old home watching cartoons? Really?
Yep! When my sons were 17 and were home from school and their part-time jobs, after doing their homework, they watched cartoons on TV -- or wrote short stories or helped me bake cookies or emptied the cats' litter boxes or did their laundry.

Self defense is not murder.

So hatefulness is OK when you think it's justified? Interesting.

I doubt they spent much time watching cartoons at 17.

Self defense is not murder.
He was where he shouldn't have been, butting into a situation he had no business being in. And it wasn't self defense.

So hatefulness is OK when you think it's justified? Interesting.
Surprised you even mention that.

I doubt they spent much time watching cartoons at 17.
They lived at home. I saw what they did here and knew how they spent their time. Daniel still does (today is his 51st birthday and he happens to be a cartoon expert). Jeremy drew a comic strip and occasional one-framers for his college weekly newspaper, was very much into creating adventures for video gamers and for D&D modules.

do they realize that everyone he plugged was a white dude ?

Proof positive that BLM is for justice, not racism.

If you watched the trial, self-defense was not close to being proven. Even though the judge has incredibly shown his preference for the defendant, the prosecution proved the charge of murder.

Self defense was clearly demonstrated. Even the man who was shot in the arm had to admit he had a weapon pointed at the kid. One of the men killed had chased this boy for quite some distance. And the judge admonished the prosecutor for a clear violation of the Constitution in attempting to imply that Kyle's silence prior to the trial should be looked upon in a suspicious manner. He was plainly wrong in bringing that up.


Surprised you even mention that.Your hateful comment? I mention it only to point out that you are not following your own moral code.



They lived at home. I saw what they did here and knew how they spent their time. Daniel still does (today is his 51st birthday and he happens to be a cartoon expert). Jeremy drew a comic strip and occasional one-framers for his college weekly newspaper, was very much into creating adventures for video gamers and for D&D modules.


Then good for them. It would certainly have been better than most of the garbage on TV today.

Self defense was clearly demonstrated. Even the man who was shot in the arm had to admit he had a weapon pointed at the kid. One of the men killed had chased this boy for quite some distance.
Did they shoot at Kyle and wound him? Did they shoot at him and miss? Then Kyle would have been correct to shoot back in self defense. EXCEPT!!! He had no business being there with an illegal weapon and no FOID card.

You don't have to be shot at in order to defend yourself. That's like saying you can't shoot someone until AFTER they stab you with their knife, or until AFTER they shoot and kill you. It's ridiculous.

How was his weapon illegal?

A FOID card? You mean what an oppressive, anti-Constitutional government mandates? Even in that case, that certainly does not amount to murder.


Proof positive that BLM is for justice, not racism.Proof positive that BLM is for violence, not justice.

You don't have to be shot at in order to defend yourself. That's like saying you can't shoot someone until AFTER they stab you with their knife, or until AFTER they shoot and kill you. It's ridiculous.
I'm gonna start carrying a gun! Lots of "karens" and "kens" out there annoying me!

How was his weapon illegal?
His 19-year-old Kenosha friend Dominick had purchased it and later sold it to Kyle for his Kenosha adventures.

A FOID card? You mean what an oppressive, anti-Constitutional government mandates? Even in that case, that certainly does not amount to murder.
I won't even bother to reply to this except for posting this sentence.

Being annoyed is hardly comparable to having a gun pointed at you.


I won't even bother to reply to this except for posting this sentence.Posting my sentence is not a reply. Besides, the weapons charge was dropped today. He did not violate Wisconsin law in that regard. Not having a commissar required FOID card would only be an Illinois violation. His 19 year old friend, however, has been charged.

Being annoyed is hardly comparable to having a gun pointed at you.
You've never really been annoyed, have you. Has someone peed in your front-yard shrubbery (twice) while walking past your house? Has anyone (drunkenly?) knocked over your driveway light late at night?

Posting my sentence is not a reply.
MY sentence, not yours.

Besides, the weapons charge was dropped today. He did not violate Wisconsin law in that regard. Not having a commissar required FOID card would only be an Illinois violation. His 19 year old friend, however, has been charged.
I wonder who got paid off.

You've never really been annoyed, have you.You've never really been annoyed until you've tried getting you to see reason!! <:

Not having a commissar required FOID card would only be an Illinois violation. His 19 year old friend, however, has been charged.
As should Illinois resident, Kyle.


You've never really been annoyed until you've tried getting you to see reason!! <:
You have no clue what reason really is.

If you watched the trial, self-defense was not close to being proven. Even though the judge has incredibly shown his preference for the defendant, the prosecution proved the charge of murder.

What wasn't proven was the prosecution's case which is what has to be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. In fact ,the prosecutor appeared to argue in closing that Kyle was not beaten up enough to warrant defending himself Prosecutor...."This is a bar fight. This is a fistfight...What you don't do is you don't bring a gun to a fistfight."
And then,,,, and I'm not joking ,,,he showed a picture of Patrick Swayze in 'Roadhouse'What a stupid argument ! Did he go to the Roadhouse to suck down some suds before prepare his final arguments ? He even argued that Rittenhouse should have let the mob attack him rather than shooting them .He quoted 'Goodfellas' verbatim..... everybody takes a beating sometime.

Every once in a while, I'd have to take a beating. But by then, I didn't care. The way I saw it, everybody takes a beating sometime. | Quotes with Sound Clips from Goodfellas | Gangster Movie Sound Clips (movie-sounds.org) (https://movie-sounds.org/gangster-movie-sound-clips/quotes-with-sound-clips-from-goodfellas/every-once-in-a-while-i-d-have-to-take-a-beating-but-by-then-i-didn-t-care-the-way-i-saw-it-everybody-takes-a-beating-sometime)

(https://twitter.com/townhallcom)The first guy he shot was chasing him, threatened to kill him, and grabbed for his gun. The next guy was swinging a skateboard at him, and the 3rd had a gun pointing at him. All 3 were threatening him.

WG the judge dismissed the illegal gun charges ;and he had as much a 'right' to be there as the BLM rioters .




(https://twitter.com/townhallcom)

You have no clue what reason really is.See what I mean??!


The first guy he shot was chasing him, threatened to kill him, and grabbed for his gun. The next guy was swinging a skateboard at him, and the 3rd had a gun pointing at him. All 3 were threatening him.It's even been argued here that you don't shoot until first being polite enough to let the other guy shoot at you first. I guess you just have to hope he misses.

It's even been argued here that you don't shoot until first being polite enough to let the other guy shoot at you first. Just like in a spaghetti western complete with the Mexican trumpet

The Good, The Bad and The Ugly Final Duel - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yp8uoQ2PS_0)

It's the result of people who have no experience with guns or self-defense other than watching movies on television, as well as having a built-in bias against white people who defend themselves against rioters. The kid probably should not have been there to begin with, but he certainly had every right to be there, and once there he had every right to defend himself, especially considering the utter failure of democratic pols to clear the streets of rioters and protect the business owners and peaceful citizens of that city.

The really incredible part of this story, as has been pointed out already, is that after hearing of a white person shooting three other white persons, President Biden somehow concludes he must be a white supremacist. It has become the default comment of liberal pols, that white people they don't agree with (and even some non-whites) are racists and white supremacists. It's the ultimate non-thinking position.

The really incredible part of this story, as has been pointed out already, is that after hearing of a white person shooting three other white persons, President Biden somehow concludes he must be a white supremacist. It has become the default comment of liberal pols, that white people they don't agree with (and even some non-whites) are racists and white supremacists. It's the ultimate non-thinking position

Jen Bagdad Bob Psaki refused to comment on that yesterday . Quid was doing what he always does like when he called Georgia's voting laws ,that actually favors extended voting ,"Jim Crow on steroids " . He shoots from the lips and then doubles down when called out .

He was plainly acting in self-defense. He did not, as was alleged here earlier, have an "illegal weapon". I just don't see what they think they can convict him of. One witness for the prosecution, the man who was shot in the arm, testified that he was shot AFTER he pointed his weapon at KR. A hateful comment has been directed towards KR by a poster here. It's all plainly a politically driven situation.

I'm guessing they may have some kind of discharge laws he violated which if guilty will be time served . They haven't come close to establishing anything resembling a so called 'hate crime' or murder of any degree .

This "white supremist" had gone to town to help. First he was cleaning graffiti and then he joined others who were guarding a used car lot .

He was first attacked by Joseph Rosenbaum .Rittenhouse yelled ‘Friendly, friendly, friendly!’. Rosenbaum threw a bag at Rittenhouse and reached for Rittenhouse’s gun. Rittenhouse pulled the trigger and Rosenbaum was killed.

Rittenhouse was then chased by a mob yelling ‘Get him!’. He fell to the ground and was hit by Anthony Huber – swinging a skateboard. Rittenhouse fired at him and killed him.

Caige Grosskreutz pointing a gun was part of the mob advancing towards Rittenhouse. Rittenhouse shot him and injured him. He later turned himself in.

The people who endorse mob rule are looking to persecute the young teen who got caught up in the mob rule. His family lived there so it is a long stretch to say that he crossed state lines looking for trouble . What he wanted to do was help protect the community that his family lives in.

What he wanted to do was help protect the community that his family lives in.
You forgot to mention the medic part....

100% of KR's actions prior to being attacked were legal activities.

One...hundred...percent.

The inept prosecution admitted that the gun KR had was not illegal, so the judge dismissed those charges. If they knew it was not illegal, then why did they charge him? If they did not know, then how unprofessional is that?

You forgot to mention the medic part what I forget to mention was the guy he shot at and missed. That would be who was identified as jump kick man' .Jump kick man kicked Rittenhouse while Rittenhouse was on the ground .Rittenhouse shot twice and missed . That was when Huber hit him with the skateboard a 2nd time .

Well Jump kick man was previously unidentified . But prosecutors only informed the defense about his identity Thursday as the trial was wrapping up . He is allegedly Maurice Freeland, a felon with a long criminal history and an open domestic violence charge, Freeland was on the streets rioting the night of the Rittenhouse shootings less than two months after getting a plea deal and probation in a domestic abuse case.

https://www.wisconsinrightnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Untitled-design-76-3-1.jpg

One of the charges is that Rittenhouse put Jump kick man's life in jeopardy. The jury went to deliberations without knowing his name even though the prosecution most assuredly knew his identification and failed to disclose it to the defense or the judge.

what I forget to mention was the guy he shot at and missed. That would be who was identified as jump kick man' .Jump kick man kicked Rittenhouse while Rittenhouse was on the ground .Rittenhouse shot twice and missed . That was when Huber hit him with the skateboard a 2nd time .
Great justification for shooting someone! I'm gonna put aside "Call of Duty" for a while and get my Mauser out of the gun safe and go to Walmart. Anybody gives me grief, watch out!

So now Walmart and a three day riot zone are comparable? Someone cutting in line ahead of you is comparable to two men kicking you in the face and beating you with a skateboard?

Wonder how you'd react if it had been one or your children being beaten and kicked?

I'm just amazed sometimes at how far you go in your efforts to side with the liberal political crowd. Now you are certainly free to express your opinion and that's fine, but to use the insulting moniker you used for KR and to be against someone defending himself against very violent aggression is just plain puzzling.

My justification is the same as Kyle's was. Ya never know what's gonna happen or who's gonna come after you. Gotta be prepared with a big gun! If ya can't scare 'em, shoot 'em!

My children wouldn't have been within 50 miles if such a mess. They would have been at work or in school -- where Kyle should have been.

My justification is the same as Kyle's was. Ya never know what's gonna happen or who's gonna come after you. Gotta be prepared with a big gun! If ya can't scare 'em, shoot 'em!And again, you are comparing a trip to WM with an experience within a active riot zone. I just think you are five hundred miles from the truth with that.


My children wouldn't have been within 50 miles if such a mess. They would have been at work or in school -- where Kyle should have been.Whatever happened to your oft-professed admonition to not be judgmental? You sure seem to be putting you and your children in a high and exalted place.

And again, you are comparing a trip to WM with an experience within a active riot zone. I just think you are five hundred miles from the truth with that.
There were stores all around that "active riot scene" that Kyle had NO BUSINESS BEING IN! One story is that he was helping put out a fire in one of those stores. With his AR-15.

Whatever happened to your oft-professed admonition to not be judgmental? You sure seem to be putting you and your children in a high and exalted place.
My sons would have fallen off their chairs laughing if I had suggested they go to a domestic war zone and "help".

There were stores all around that "active riot scene" that Kyle had NO BUSINESS BEING IN! One story is that he was helping put out a fire in one of those stores. With his AR-15.I would agree that his being there was questionable, but he had every right to be there. He did nothing that was illegal, and you have shown nothing that would make him guilty of murder or that would suggest he was not entitled to defend himself. The real failure was that of liberal dem pols who allowed the riots to continue unopposed for several days. Even you refer to it as a domestic war zone. What was really needed was a mayor and governor who were committed to law and order and not just sitting on their backporch rocking while a city was burned by illegal thugs. It was yet another failure of liberal dem pols.


My sons would have fallen off their chairs laughing if I had suggested they go to a domestic war zone and "help".Yep. Mighty high and exalted, and too much so to risk life and limb to be helpful to people who really needed it? Your point is that you and your sons were wonderful people relative to that animal KR, but do you think he would call you a hateful name the way you did to him? Does that lower you a bit?

I would agree that his being there was questionable, but he had every right to be there. He did nothing that was illegal, and you have shown nothing that would make him guilty of murder or that would suggest he was not entitled to defend himself.
Kyle was 17 and had NO BUSINESS being there. Full stop.

Yep. Mighty high and exalted, and too much so to risk life and limb to be helpful to people who really needed it? Your point is that you and your sons were wonderful people relative to that animal KR, but do you think he would call you a hateful name the way you did to him? Does that lower you a bit?
Do you embroider doilies too?

Kyle was 17 and had NO BUSINESS being there. Full stop.Probably a fair statement. Still, he is not guilty of murder, and he had a complete legal right to be there and defend himself.


Do you embroider doilies too?Nice try at diversion, but it won't work. You called him a hateful name and were intensely judgmental. And you won't address either one which is also sad. Do you really consider yourself to be such a superior person to KR?

When he is found not guilty, will you be critical of the BLM and Antifa folks if they try to burn Kenosha a second time? Will your political allegiances allow for that?

I'd say that rioters and assailants Maurice Freeland, Joseph Rosenbaum ,Anthony Huber and Caige Grosskreutz had less right in that they were there doing an illegal act that Rittenhouse needed to defend himself against .

Note that Wisonsin Guv Evers called out the National Guard in anticipation of a verdict . He is not really concerned about the possibility of a guilty verdict . Rittenhouse supporters would mumble about the injustice and peacefully leave. He is worried about an acquittal and how the lefty mob would react. .
When the mob dictates law and order there is no law and order .Clearly the left's prescription is to let the mob rule the streets .

Probably a fair statement. Still, he is not guilty of murder, and he had a complete legal right to be there and defend himself.
The moral overrides legal. He wouldn't have had to "defend himself" had he been at home in Illinois.

Nice try at diversion, but it won't work. You called him a hateful name and were intensely judgmental.
And you accept and have no problem with the hateful names "Madam Mim" and "Sleepy Joe" and "Kam the Sham"?

The moral overrides legal.Not in a court of law.

As to names, I don't use the names you listed or any others for that matter, so you will have to take that up with someone else. But one way or the other, your hateful reference to a 17 year old boy is all on you.

Not in a court of law.
The gates of hell await? Fifth Commandment.

As to names, I don't use the names you listed or any others for that matter

You just let it slide when someone else uses those "nicknames". Although...you have a favorite one you use to put me down and insult me.

i don't use 'sleepy Joe ' . I call him Quid Pro Joe .

i don't use 'sleepy Joe ' .
Someone else uses that nickname. *giggle*

You just let it slide when someone else uses those "nicknames". Although...you have a favorite one you use to put me down and insult me.Tom does not criticize others for name calling. You do, so you should follow your own moral code. That would also hold true for being judgmental. Correct?

I wonder where you got "Sleepy Joe" from. Is someone in the WG household engaged in secret name-calling???

Tom does not criticize others for name calling.
He is, as wonderful and adorable as he is, the name caller!


I wonder where you got "Sleepy Joe" from. Is someone in the WG household engaged in secret name-calling???
It's a favorite of the guy who just sold his loser DC hotel.

It's a favorite of the guy who just sold his loser DC hotel.So you two are actually a lot alike, aren't you? You are both name-callers. Congratulations!! The difference is that Trump takes on people his own size, and not 17 year old boys. Shame.

So you two are actually a lot alike, aren't you?
We're certainly not as holy as you are! And we're even about the same age! We'd have fun going out for lunch at McDonald's. I'd have him wrapped around my little finger within the first two minutes.

Trump takes on people his own size
Kyle's taller and bigger than I am.

We're certainly not as holy as you are!And yet another diversion. You are the one who was bragging about how wonderful you and your family are/were. That's all still on you. And KR is still a 17 year old boy, but at least you are referring to him by his name now, so that is progress. I'm encouraged!!

at least you are referring to him by his name now, so that is progress. I'm encouraged!!
Who? Kyle Outhouse? (See what you made me do???)

Judge Bruce Schroeder banned MSNBC from the court . One of it's producers attempted to stalk the jury. The producer has been identified as James Morrison. He was stopped by police this morning after running a stoplight while attempting to follow the jury van. He was charged with several traffic violations.

The judge said :
"I have instructed that no one from MSNBC News will be permitted in this building for the duration of this trial," "This is a very serious matter. I don’t know what the ultimate truth of it is … but someone following a jury bus is an extremely serious matter, and will be referred to the proper authorities for further action."

NYC settled with BLM $13.7 million for arrests made while BLM torched the city .

NYC to pay $13M, or $10K each, to arrested BLM protesters (nypost.com) (https://nypost.com/2023/07/20/nyc-to-pay-13m-to-blm-protestors/)

Each rioter arrested will receive $9,950

Is this a benchmark for how rioters are compensated for being arrested ? Will the same standard be applied to January 6 'mostly peaceful' protesters who have been mass arrested ;many still in jail uncharged or pending trial ?

There was some violence in the Jan.6 protest . But nothing compared to

https://americanliberty.news/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Minneapolis_Riot_George_Floyd-741x486.jpeg

So now criminals get paid for destroying property? Well, in a culture that allows men to compete in women's athletics simply by calling themselves females, I guess this is not so much of a stretch as it seemed at first glance. In the meantime, the people who lost their property to destruction by what is now paid rioters will just have to fend for themselves.

So should we now look at BLM as an acronym for "Black Looters Matter"?