dontknownuthin
Jan 14, 2016, 02:59 PM
My upstairs neighbor had a leaking toilet - the shut off valve was 50 years old and worn out. I repeatedly asked him to deal with it because it was raining in my bathroom directly below and he wouldn't call a plumber. He was threatened with action by the association, and decided to fix it himself. Without shutting off the main, he took a hack saw to the supply line to the toilet (I know). The property manager was two hours away with the key to the utility closet, required to shut off the main. The water gushed full force for two hours through all my ceilings into my condo below.
Fast forward to the clean up. The flood water took out half each of two bedrooms and two full bathrooms, hallway and part of the living room. In total, it wiped out about 70% of my place and I had to move out for repairs. A flood mitigation team came in, and moved the stuff from the wet area to the dry area. This stuff wasn't soaked but was damp. Then they sealed off the directly impacted areas. They removed the wet building materials, then set up commercial dehumidifiers and fans.
The insurance adjuster is giving me grief now because some items (mattresses and couches) that were on the other side of the plastic from the directly impacted areas are damp and getting mildewed (it has been 11 days now) but he says that since they were not in directly impacted areas of the home, they aren't covered. I have two thoughts about that. First, why didn't they take the plastic down and dry out the whole place? Second, what is this "directly impacted" nonsense? They got wet from the ambient moisture in the home caused by this incident.
So my question - what is standard? Should they have taken that plastic down to dehumidify given there were wet items on the other side of the plastic?
Fast forward to the clean up. The flood water took out half each of two bedrooms and two full bathrooms, hallway and part of the living room. In total, it wiped out about 70% of my place and I had to move out for repairs. A flood mitigation team came in, and moved the stuff from the wet area to the dry area. This stuff wasn't soaked but was damp. Then they sealed off the directly impacted areas. They removed the wet building materials, then set up commercial dehumidifiers and fans.
The insurance adjuster is giving me grief now because some items (mattresses and couches) that were on the other side of the plastic from the directly impacted areas are damp and getting mildewed (it has been 11 days now) but he says that since they were not in directly impacted areas of the home, they aren't covered. I have two thoughts about that. First, why didn't they take the plastic down and dry out the whole place? Second, what is this "directly impacted" nonsense? They got wet from the ambient moisture in the home caused by this incident.
So my question - what is standard? Should they have taken that plastic down to dehumidify given there were wet items on the other side of the plastic?