County officials can NOT find me!!

If I were to call 911, I would probably die before anyone would find me!!

My residence is the ORIGINAL residence in the middle of a farm that is surrounded by an addition formed in 1989 which is covered by a recorded covenant. This covenant is active until 2009, which can have changes at that time. If no change, it will continue for another 10 years.

The author of the covenant was the owner of the properties that created the addition and the owner of my present residence which sits smack dab in the middle... with an original driveway and address to the east.

When the gentleman died a year later, the county stopped protecting the covenant and this residence, where I live presently, has had over 5 addresses AND THREE different DRIVE-ways! The later TWO driveways were NOT endorsed by the covenant and was NOT authorized by the covenant.

Now, I understand that the covenant has ambiguous language that does NOT clearly say the other THREE 50 foot easements are for roads... HOWEVER!! It does call these 50 foot easements (utility easements) and says NOTHING ABOUT ROADS on these easements and the THIRD owner of this residence(the one who sold to us) had his lawyer CHANGE the language of the warranty deed to accommodate the violation the county committed against the covenant without proper judicial authority in a court of law to allow a road to be put on the utility easements... covering the SECOND owner of the residence's mistake in another real estate transaction and the county's failure to uphold the recorded covenant and lost the ORIGINAL DRIVE-WAY that should have remained with the residence.

Timeline...

South I address (EAST ENTRANCE)... (original in '89 owned by the author of covenant)

Address gets changed to SANDPIT ROAD (SOUTHERN UTILITY 50 foot EASEMENT)... (second owner who lost original driveway during a real estate screw up transaction... allowed by the county which is the beginning of county's violation of covenant.. year 2000)

Address gets changed to NEW PALESTINE (third owner who pays a lawyer to change the language of warranty deed to allow EAST UTILITY 50 foot EASEMENT to be used for a drive way to ORIGINAL RESIDENCE... aaaaaand ALLOWS original property to be DIVIDED and separates farmland from the ORIGINAL RESIDENCE into SEVERAL properties and whittles down original residence with ONLY 10 acres... a far cry from the original 60 acres> 2005)


Address gets changed to Langdon View (by us requesting new address because it causes confusion with others on this NEW *road* {i.e. NEW PALESTINE} that are allowed to build and use this UTILITY EASEMENT to ingress/egress)

We get a county sign properly addressing this NEW *road* and it is placed on the UTILITY EASEMENT and the *third owner* files a complaint with the county saying they OWN this easement and wants the sign removed... even though the covenant CLEARLY gives county authoriation and power to put poles, phone lines, electrical lines, and water on these three easements with clear language set forth by the original author which should have enabled the county's right to put the road sign on the easement for the NEW OWNER'S residence for the 911 system BECAUSE the county ALLOWED a ROAD to be put on this UTILITY EASEMENT IN THE FIRST PLACE.

When the owner makes the county remove the sign, we threaten to hire a land lawyer because our rights are violated and emergency personnel can NOT find us!

The county out of frustration holds an emergency meeting without our knowledge and gives us ANOTHER ADDRESS (CHURCH CAMP) which is NO WHERE NEAR OUR RESIDENCE!!

HELP HELP HELP

We feel our best bet is to have a judge in court CLEARLY DEFINE the language of the covenant and the author's original intent for these 50 foot easements and straighten out the ORIGINAL drive way debacle. That if we get a judge to see the covenant for the original intent, we will be able to sue the county for their violation of the covenant and make them HONOR the covenant and admit their mistake and give us back our sign and properly mark the original residence with the NEW address and proper placing on the 50 foot easement...

If the county allowed roads on these easements (violating covenant) then the owner of these easements who changed the language and WANTED these roads MUST ALLOW the county to PROPERLY MARK THESE ROADS FOR THE 911 system.

The county is clearly ALLOWING the owners of these easements to do what they PLEASE and allowing the covenant to be repeatedly broken... while NOT protecting the residence who live at the end of these NEW road easements.

By the way, there is NO county ordinances or anything concerning easements in this county... it IS redneck USA!!


Who would I contact in MY STATE OF INDIANA about my rights for proper address and 911 service?

Who do I contact about a county's violation of a recorded land covenant?

Thanx~
shecreed

Many areas do not have 911 addressing in the computer system, if they do, the actual place of your home will be in a computer system, and will show up within about 10 ft on a GPS tracking system.

Many rual areas still do not have these systems in place. In these cases you need to properly MARK your Drive with large reflective lettering and perhaps even solar powered lite numbers.

As far as the sign, sue the person who made the county take it down and sue the county, sue the 911 commissino and the surveyor who did the work. ( name any and everyone)

But the county can allow easements and can allow subdivisions, it is within their rights to do this. If you have a public road, (not driveway, you have a right to have it marked.

But basically time for an attorney, not going to get anything done without a lawsuit

county officials can NOT find me!!!

if i were to call 911, i would probably die before anyone would find me!!!

my residence is the ORIGINAL residence in the middle of a farm that is surrounded by an addition formed in 1989 which is covered by a recorded covenant. this covenant is active til 2009, which can have changes at that time. if no change, it will continue for another 10 years.

the author of the covenant was the owner of the properties that created the addition and the owner of my present residence which sits smack dab in the middle..... with an original driveway and address to the east.

when the gentleman died a year later, the county stopped protecting the covenant and this residence, where i live presently, has had over 5 addresses AND THREE different DRIVE-ways! the later TWO driveways were NOT endorsed by the covenant and was NOT authorized by the covenant.

now, i understand that the covenant has ambiguous language that does NOT clearly say the other THREE 50 foot easements are for roads.... HOWEVER!!! it does call these 50 foot easements (utility easements) and says NOTHING ABOUT ROADS on these easements and the THIRD owner of this residence(the one who sold to us) had his lawyer CHANGE the language of the warranty deed to accomodate the violation the county committed against the covenant without proper judicial authority in a court of law to allow a road to be put on the utility easements ....covering the SECOND owner of the residence's mistake in another real estate transaction and the county's failure to uphold the recorded covenant and lost the ORIGINAL DRIVE-WAY that should have remained with the residence.

timeline...

south I address (EAST ENTRANCE)...... (original in '89 owned by the author of covenant)

address gets changed to SANDPIT ROAD (SOUTHERN UTILITY 50 foot EASEMENT).... (second owner who lost original driveway during a real estate screw up transaction... allowed by the county which is the beginning of county's violation of covenant ..year 2000)

address gets changed to NEW PALESTINE (third owner who pays a lawyer to change the language of warranty deed to allow EAST UTILITY 50 foot EASEMENT to be used for a drive way to ORIGINAL RESIDENCE ...aaaaaand ALLOWS original property to be DIVIDED and seperates farmland from the ORIGINAL RESIDENCE into SEVERAL properties and whittles down original residence with ONLY 10 acres.... a far cry from the original 60 acres> 2005)


address gets changed to Langdon View (by us requesting new address because it causes confusion with others on this NEW *road* {i.e. NEW PALESTINE} that are allowed to build and use this UTILITY EASEMENT to ingress/egress)

we get a county sign properly addressing this NEW *road* and it is placed on the UTILITY EASEMENT and the *third owner* files a complaint with the county saying they OWN this easement and wants the sign removed.... even though the covenant CLEARLY gives county authoriation and power to put poles, phone lines, electrical lines, and water on these three easements with clear language set forth by the original author which should have enabled the county's right to put the road sign on the easement for the NEW OWNER'S residence for the 911 system BECAUSE the county ALLOWED a ROAD to be put on this UTILITY EASEMENT IN THE FIRST PLACE.

when the owner makes the county remove the sign, we threaten to hire a land lawyer because our rights are violated and emergency personnel can NOT find us!

the county out of frustration holds an emergency meeting without our knowledge and gives us ANOTHER ADDRESS (CHURCH CAMP) which is NO WHERE NEAR OUR RESIDENCE!!!

HELP HELP HELP

we feel our best bet is to have a judge in court CLEARLY DEFINE the language of the covenant and the author's original intent for these 50 foot easements and straighten out the ORIGINAL drive way debacle. that if we get a judge to see the covenant for the original intent, we will be able to sue the county for their violation of the covenant and make them HONOR the covenant and admit their mistake and give us back our sign and properly mark the original residence with the NEW address and proper placing on the 50 foot easement.....

if the county allowed roads on these easements (violating covenant) then the owner of these easements who changed the language and WANTED these roads MUST ALLOW the county to PROPERLY MARK THESE ROADS FOR THE 911 system.

the county is clearly ALLOWING the owners of these easements to do what they PLEASE and allowing the covenant to be repeatedly broken ...while NOT protecting the residence who live at the end of these NEW road easements.

by the way, there is NO county ordinances or anything concerning easements in this county... it IS redneck USA!!!


who would i contact in MY STATE OF INDIANA about my rights for proper address and 911 service?

who do i contact about a county's violation of a recorded land covenant?

thanx~
shecreed
Most 911 systems operate on the county grid that is attached to your phone system.

I actually have to look in our Dec phone book to see what our street address is since I get mail at a po box and our property has a "historical name"... call your 911 dispatcher to verify what may not be a problem at all.

If you live in a remote location, having someone take you to the nearest cross-street may be the better idea to get you to prompt medical attention.