Can someone please explain to what is adultery law... can someone tell what it is and what can be done on this. I was told my husband would be charged for child abondamen adultery law... in tx and in ga... im a little confused and when I Google it it only tells me when a woman have a baby for another man other than her husband...

Few places still have any laws on the books, in Georgia it deals with not paying court ordered child support. Georgia does not enforce any adultery laws at this time ( at least not in my 10 years of being here and in Fulton and Cobb County)

So explain what your role is in all of this

My husband amd I was separated for 6 months when he met another married woman which led to a baby... the baby is 8 months... she had my husband tested and its his child... she filed abondament warrant on him and he was picked up for a felony child abondament warrant. My husband went to the child support office to put himself on child support, but he received a letter stating due to the legal father/bio law they can't proceed with the case until her husband is dismissed as the legal father... now she lives in tx and she said she filed another abondament warrant on him and its under the adultery law... my husband sends something every month not much just to stop her from filing abondament warrants on him... which has not stopped... the only address we have on her is her parents address in ga and they telling him to stop sending mail there... at this point we don't know what to do and she won't stop filing abondament warrants on him

He needs to stop playing with her, first unless there is a court order for support she is filing false reports to have him arrested.

So he needs to hire an attorney, who needs to either file to prove paternity. After that he can not just
"send alittle money to keep her from doing something" that is blackmail, not support, unless there is a real court order for support, no support is even owed.

It appears this lady is using the system to black mail him out of money, he needs to be represented by a local attorney

Next unless they had sex in Texas, any criminal chares for adultry would not be valid

We have an attorney and his attorney called her to talk to her and he told us to keep sending something... either way this is not going to away because she is going to the courts and lie and tell them he's not sending anything... she is going to the court and showing them the dna test she have showing he is the father... she is not telling the court that there is no child support order... and that her husband is still the legal father... she claims the courts know about her husband being the legal father and they told her as long as she have a dna test proving he is the father that's all she needs... it got him arrested once already... the agent from child support told him the same thing there is no child support order so she can't file abondament charges on him, but she is... she just sent him a message yesterday saying she filed again in tx and its being investigated under adultery law... I juat wish there was a way we can stop all this non sense... this is messing him up... he do contract work

On a military base and with pending charges on him is not good... at this point we don't know how to stop this and now he have to go to tx for a court hearing... she also said she's moving back to ga so she can handle her business better... I really thought hiring an attorney would help, but at this point it hasn't... it just seem so easy for her to file abondament warrant on him... what can we do

Im going to assume that the DNA test wasn't court ordered ? What he has to do is wait for something to be filed. If she is making threats to send money or else. He needs to go and file charges against her for extorsion. Since this is happening across State lines then it may even get her federal charges. Once she is in prison then she can't do much of anything.

Adultery is having sex with someone other than your spouse and is still a crime in Georgia.

OP's husband is being charged with not paying child support or, as they call it in Georgia, "abandonment".

Apparently the only way that abandonment and adultery are connected in this case is that the child is a product of an adulterous relationship.

The problem OP is having is that her hisband needs to keep sending child support but he doesn't know the mother's address. Doesn't Georgia have a child support agency through which this could be done?

No, it was not court ordered... she paid for a the dna test herself... she said she filed it already...

Adultery is when a married person has sexual relations with someone other than the person they are married to.

In GA child abandonment refers to not supporting their child.

In most states, when a child is born to a married couple the husband is automatically the legal father until a court rules otherwise.

So that brings us to your situation. It is very rare that adultery laws are enforced. What probably happened is the mother filed for support (abandonment) against your husband. But since her husband is the legal father the case was denied, at least until he has been declared the legal father.

He should stop sending money, but should be putting money into a savings account until support is ordered by a court.

Who is telling you about filing warrants in Texas? If it's the mother, then she is lying to you. Adultery is no longer illegal in Texas, though it can be used as grounds for divorce, which is not an issue for you. She may be able to file for child support, but if she does your husband will be served a summons about the court action.

So your husband needs to decide what to do. He can do nothing and wait for a summons. Or he can file for custody of the child and get a real support order.

The child was made during there adulterous relationship... its my husband that has the child for her... child support won't take the case because her husband is still considered to be the child's legal father.. there is no current child support order due to the legal father/bio law...

When posting a follow-up question or info, please use the Answer options at the bottom of the page rather than the Comments. Please see my previous response.

Yes, the mother said she filed in TX. He tried doing that by going through child support, but they closed the case because of her husband being the legal father... the only address he have on her is her parents address and her parents is returning the mail back to us. Where would he go to file for custody since child support services won't deal with the case.

The courts is allowing her to file the abondament warrants against my husband and we not understanding why. He was arrested in Feb for an abondament warrant and she claims she has filed another one. The first warrant was filed in hinesville ga and this one she just filed was in Tx

Again as Scott has asked nicely, stop using that comment feature, if you want to give more info and follow up, ANSWER the question, not the comment feature

I thought I was suppose tp comment on each person response... sorry didn't know I will use the answer key from now on

Thank you,

No in fact you don't have to comment on each post, and since often they may be about the same

yes, the mother said she filed in TX. he tried doing that by going through child support, but they closed the case because of her husband being the legal father...the only address he have on her is her parents address and her parents is returning the mail back to us. Where would he go to file for custody since child support services wont deal with the case.

But what proof do you have that she filed anything? Like I said, there are adultery laws in TX so if you is telling you that she is filing under those laws she's lying. Have you received ANYTHING from any TX court? If so, what?


The courts is allowing her to file the abondament warrants against my husband and we not understanding why. He was arrested in Feb for an abondament warrant and she claims she has filed another one. The first warrant was filed in hinesville ga and this one she just filed was in Tx

Again, GA is different. Please reread what I originally posted, you need to understand what has actually happened. Yes, she filed for abandonment in GA and they issued the warrant before fully investigating. Once they did they found he is not the legal father so there is no question of abandonment. So she cannot refile in GA unless she challenges her husband's paternity. And I'm not sure she has legal standing to do so. Either your husband or hers needs to file. And that would be done in Family court.

Also, do not believe what she "claims". Texas doesn't work the same way as GA. She has to file a case for child support and your husband would have a chance to respond to that case. If she claims to have filed for such a warrant ask her for the name of the court and the case docket #.

P.s. you don't need to respond to each response you get. Read through the response then answer all the questions or respond to all the points.

This is the message the child's mother sent my husband...

Just so you know... I filed for an abandoment warrant again... but you were rght... its done through an investigation process... but the process has 7:10 PM
171 more messages
(2/5) begun... I gv them the address... and you keep hoping this biological thg is going to keep you from paying... its nt going to help you with the child 7:10 PM
(3/5) abandoment... its a such thg as adulterine law... as long as I hv proof... for example a dna result... u r still responsible in an abd. 7:10 PM
(4/5) Case... so that little game you played on me last week... only added flame to the fire... and yes I know hinesville tried to dismiss it based on 7:10 PM
(5/5) that... but they cnt... and I will make sure its handled rght... cause of hw your still doing hm 7

I think she's lying. I checked and Texas no longer has adultery laws. Also Texas does not refer to failure to pay support as abandonment. Also, the court is not likely to accept a private DNA test, especially one she supplied. Notice she said nothing about court or docket #s.

What "little game" did she refer to?

Do you know how long she has been in TX? She would have to be there at least 6 months. Even then, since this was originally started in GA and you still live in GA, then GA continues to have jurisdiction. So you should be able to get anything she files in TX moved back to GA, which will then dismiss because he's not the legal father.

Have him tell her that he has researched the law and he doesn't believe that she can do anything. That he will wait for a court summons before he does anything more.

Normally I don't like to advise a father not to support their child, but I don't like a mother trying to extort support from a father. By the way did he see the DNA test results?

Have him tell her that he has researched the law and he doesn't believe that she can do anything. That he will wait for a court summons before he does anything more.


I can't say I agree with this part of the statement. It has already been said that the OP's husband has a lawyer. It is the lawyer that should be handling this and there should be no further contact with the mother. He should tell her no contact and if she insists on doing so then get a restraining order. It sounds like this woman needs to be put in her place by the law.

I can't say I agree with this part of the statement. It has already been said that the OP's husband has a lawyer. Its is the lawyer that should be handling this and there should be no further contact with the mother. He should tell her no contact and if she insists on doing so then get a restraining order. It sounds like this woman needs to be put in her place by the law.

You're right. I forgot that the OP (or the husband) already has a lawyer.

Thank you all for your advise, the little game she is talking about is my husband lawyer called her last week and told her he wants to another dna test through the court. Yes, he received a copy of the dna test and it says he's 97% the father. No, we have not received anything in the mail from tx. She moved to TX in march.

More evidence against her. She has not established residence in Texas so Texas would not have any jurisdiction and would refuse to process any claims.

I would have him tell her not to contact him anymore. Any correspondence should be through his attorney.

The Attorney General from TX called my husband yesterday asking him if he would agree to a video court conference and agree to pay child support and sign some papers. My husband told the lady from the attorney general office to call his lawyer. We are wondering why they are calling if her husband is still the legal father. Do Texas have the same law as GA as far as a woman's husband is the legal father? We tried contacting his lawyer, but he hasn't returned his call. The attorney general is who handles child support. Cases.

First, did you confirm that it was really the AG's office that called? If it really was, then she may have lied to them. Yes they do have similar laws. When they reach your husband's attorney he will tell them that your husband is not the legal father and that TX does not have jurisdiction.

Yes, I confirmed it was the AG'S office and he told her she was married and her husband is the legal father.

TDo texas have the same law as GA as far as a womans husband is the legal father?

Yes, but both in Ga and Tx this presumption may be rebutted by DNA test.If there was DNA test which showed her husband was not BF then he would not be the legal father anymore.

Thus they will go after your husband for child support notwithstanding she may remain married to her husband.

yes, I confirmed it was the AG'S office and he told her she was married and her husband is the legal father.

"he" meaning your husband? What did the AGs rep say to that? Were they aware of it?


Yes, but both in Ga and Tx this presumption may be rebutted by DNA test.If there was DNA test which showed her husband was not BF then he would not be the legal father anymore.

Yes, but wouldn't such a test need to be ordered by a court? Would either accept a privately done test? And wouldn't any change in the legal father have to be adjudicated by a court? Also since the mother has apparently lived in TX less than 6 months, wouldn't a GA court have to rule on paternity? In fact, since the mother originally filed for support in GA and the OP's husband continues to reside in GA, wouldn't GA continue to have jurisdiction as long as the OP's jusband resides in GA?

TITLE 5. THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP AND THE SUIT AFFECTING THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP
(13) "Presumed father" means a man who, by operation of law under Section 160.204, is recognized as the father of a child until that status is rebutted or confirmed in a judicial proceeding.

Sec. 160.204. PRESUMPTION OF PATERNITY. (a) A man is presumed to be the father of a child if:
(1) he is married to the mother of the child and the child is born during the marriage;


Sec. 160.602. STANDING TO MAINTAIN PROCEEDING. (a) Subject to Subchapter D and Sections 160.607 and 160.609 and except as provided by Subsection (b), a proceeding to adjudicate parentage may be maintained by:
(1) the child;
(2) the mother of the child;
(3) a man whose paternity of the child is to be adjudicated;
(4) the support enforcement agency or another government agency authorized by other law;
Sec. 160.604. PERSONAL JURISDICTION. (a) An individual may not be adjudicated to be a parent unless the court has personal jurisdiction over the individual.
(b) A court of this state having jurisdiction to adjudicate parentage may exercise personal jurisdiction over a nonresident individual or the guardian or conservator of the individual if the conditions in Section 159.201 are satisfied.

Sec. 160.607. TIME LIMITATION: CHILD HAVING PRESUMED FATHER. (a) Except as otherwise provided by Subsection (b), a proceeding brought by a presumed father, the mother, or another individual to
Adjudicate the parentage of a child having a presumed father shall be commenced not later than the fourth anniversary of the date of the birth of the child.

"he" meaning your husband? What did the AGs rep say to that? Were they aware of it?
Yes, but wouldn't such a test need to be ordered by a court?
I guess the AG is involved=the test was court ordered.

I guess the AG is involved=the test was court ordered.

This is from post #9
"no, it was not court ordered...she paid for a the dna test herself....she said she filed it already..."

Again, my feeling is TX has no jurisdiction here.

This is from post #9
"no, it was not court ordered...she paid for a the dna test herself....she said she filed it already..."

Again, my feeling is TX has no jurisdiction here.

Do not trust to all you are reading.The judge in Texas was able to allow a paternity disestablishment proceeding.That proceeding is unrelated to the problem of OP.
We do not know the entire story.

Again-I am a little confused... if her husband has not ceased his legal status ,the Office of the Attorney General should go after him.But it is not the case.

Again-I am a little confused...if her husband has not ceased his legal status ,the Office of the Attorney General should go after him.But it is not the case.

Exactly! The husband of the mother is still the legal father. Since that is the case, the GA authorities declined to accept support from the OP's husband. Until a court changes paternity, the OP's husband has not obligation. Since the case was originally adjudicated in GA and since the mother has not lived in TX for 6 months, how can TX have any jurisdiction?

Exactly! The husband of the mother is still the legal father. Since that is the case, the GA authorities declined to accept support from the OP's husband. Until a court changes paternity, the OP's husband has not obligation. Since the case was originally adjudicated in GA and since the mother has not lived in TX for 6 months, how can TX have any jurisdiction?

Easy... a case may be transferred upon request from one state to another state.It happens in hundreds of cases every day

The husband of the mother is still the legal father.

I am not sure.

Let's see:

Sec. 160.501. APPLICATION OF SUBCHAPTER. This subchapter governs genetic testing of an individual to determine parentage, regardless of whether the individual:
(1) voluntarily submits to testing; or
(2) is tested under an order of a court or a support enforcement agency.

Thus voluntary DNA tests are allowed in the state of Texas if
Sec. 160.503. REQUIREMENTS FOR GENETIC TESTING. (a) Genetic testing must be of a type reasonably relied on by experts in the field of genetic testing. The testing must be performed in a testing laboratory accredited by:
(1) the American Association of Blood Banks, or a successor to its functions;
(2) the American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, or a successor to its functions; or
(3) an accrediting body designated by the federal secretary of health and human services.

She paid for the test-it is not again the Texan law

Sec. 160.506. COSTS OF GENETIC TESTING. (a) Subject to the assessment of costs under Subchapter G, the cost of initial genetic testing must be advanced:

(2) by the individual who made the request;
She has standing to ask for determination of parent-child relationship
Sec. 160.602. STANDING TO MAINTAIN PROCEEDING
(2) the mother of the child
...and it is related to
Sec. 160.604. PERSONAL JURISDICTION. (a) An individual may not be adjudicated to be a parent unless the court has personal jurisdiction over the individual.
(b) A court of this state having jurisdiction to adjudicate parentage may exercise personal jurisdiction over a nonresident individual or the guardian or conservator of the individual if the conditions in Section 159.201 are satisfied.
There is no defense that the child has marital father:
Sec. 160.607. TIME LIMITATION: CHILD HAVING PRESUMED FATHER. (a) Except as otherwise provided by Subsection (b), a proceeding brought by a presumed father, the mother, or another individual to adjudicate the parentage of a child having a presumed father shall be commenced not later than the fourth anniversary of the date of the birth of the child.


And finally
Sec. 160.621. ADMISSIBILITY OF RESULTS OF GENETIC TESTING; EXPENSES. (a) Except as otherwise provided by Subsection (c), a report of a genetic testing expert is admissible as evidence of the truth of the facts asserted in the report. The admissibility of the report is not affected by whether the testing was performed:
(1) voluntarily or under an order of the court or a support enforcement agency;

I guess the scenario is:

1. The marital presumption was rebutted in Texas.
2. The child became fatherless.
3. The Attorney General commenced child support proceeding.
4. "The Home state" rule is inapplicable.

ESince the case was originally adjudicated in GA

No,the case was not adjudicated in Ga.

my husband went to the child support office to put himself on child support, but he received a letter stating due to the legal father/bio law they can't proceed with the case until her husband is dismissed as the legal father.



she claims the courts know about her husband being the legal father and they told her as long as she have a dna test proving he is the father thats all she needs
Correct both in Tx and Ga.She needs of DNA test only.
Let's see Georgia:
19-7-54 - Motion to set aside determination of paternity
a motion to set aside a determination of paternity may be made at any time upon the grounds set forth in this Code section. Any such motion shall be filed in the superior court and shall include:

(1) An affidavit executed by the movant that the newly discovered evidence has come to movant's knowledge since the entry of judgment; and

(2) The results from scientifically credible parentage-determination genetic testing, as authorized under Code Section 19-7-46 and administered within 90 days prior to the filing of such motion, that finds that there is a 0 percent probability that the male ordered to pay such child support is the father of the child for whom support is required.

(b) The court shall grant relief on a motion filed in accordance with subsection (a) of this Code section upon a finding by the court of all of the following:

(1) The genetic test required in paragraph (2) of subsection (a) of this Code section was properly conducted;

(2) The male ordered to pay child support has not adopted the child;



Again-I am confused about the AG intervention.For me that means:
1.The marital presumption was already rebutted.
2 There is procedure .for paternity disestablishment in Texas.

Everything I have posted is the entire story, nothing has been left out. When my husband called the AG's office back and told the lady she was married and her husband was the legal father she said nothing. My husband also told her he opened a child support case in GA, but it was closed due to the legal/bio law. The AG said the case will be transferred to TX because the child lives in TX, there can't be a CS case in GA because of where the child resides. There was never a court ordered dna test done there was only one dna test and that was through a company called "DNA SERVICES OF AMERICA". At this point my husband don't know what to do, and he has paid this lawyer and he is not being helpful at all.

When my husband called the AG's office back and told the lady she was married and her husband was the legal father she said nothing.
And what did you expect..?

My husband also told her he opened a child support case in GA...he AG said the case will be transfered to TX because the child lives in TX,
Correct and lawful. A child support case has to be handled in the state where the child lives in.

one dna test and that was through a company called "DNA SERVICES OF AMERICA"
"DNA SERVICES OF AMERICA" is recognized as trusted by the government.

At this point my husband dont know what to do
The easiest way is to settle the problem as soon as possible.

The Attorney General from TX called my husband yesterday asking him if he would agree to a video court conference and agree to pay child support and sign some papers.

How easy!


We are wondering why they are calling if her husband is still the legal father.
Oh, I see where the problem is:mad::mad:... your husband makes babies with pleasure but you do not want him to be held responsible for his sexual behavior!
Everybody makes choices, and nobody should be entitled to special treatment because of those choices.

My husband has no problem taking care of his responsibility, its not about the baby with this woman. He was sending money every month to this child and they would purposely send the money back and lying saying he has not supported this child and she would file abondament to get him arrested. We have copies of all money orders that was mailed to her as well as every returned item. This is why he went to the child support office to file a case when she was living in GA. We did not know anything about the legal/bio father law until a case worker from CS called my husband and told him the situation. He figured if he go through child support and pay them directly there would be no way she can return the money and lie and say he has not supported this child. All of a sudden she moves to TX and doing things and calling making threats. Now she says she's moving back to GA, I think she was just visiting TX. The only thing she rather see is my husband in jail instead of getting support for this child. If it was really about the child she would have stayed in GA and did what was needed to be done. CS in GA told her she can submit a DNA test through the state and that would dismiss her husband as the legal father and enter my husband as the legal and bio father. She said she was not doing another DNA test. My husband was given an appt by CS to take another DNA and he did his part. An appointment was sent to the mother twice to bring the child to get a test done in TX and she refused t o go both times. She said she wants the case to close. CS said by law they have to give a dna test through the state if they provide services and if the father ask for one. When she didn't show up to take the test that's when CS closed the test. CS said it can be done through them by taking a DNA test with the state or by the court dismissing her husband. It seems to me if that's all I had to do was take my child to take a test and then the CS case will be processed I would have done that in stead of going through all this unnessary stuff.

Oh, I see where the problem is:mad::mad:...your husband makes babies with pleasure but you do not want him to be held responsible for his sexual behavior!


If you read the whole thread you would see this remark was uncalled for. The OP's husband doesn't seem to be shirking his responsibility, it is the mother who seems to be playing games with him. This is why I've been supporting the OP.

Tearia,
It appears, from the statutes that GV cites, that Tx is willing to accept jurisdiction for this case. Though I still wonder why when they haven't been there long enough to establish residency. Do you know if the AG called your attorney? You should still be working through your attorney. But, if he confirms, the law as GV has cited, then you should go ahead with the video conference. On the other hand, before this conference is scheduled, I would require that TX officially acknowledges him as the legal father. I would then take that official notification and immediately apply for joint legal custody and visitation. I would let this woman know that your husband is not an ATM. That he is perfectly willing to support his child, but he also wants to be a part of his child's life. He should then request, through his attorney, that this video conference include a hearing on the custody/visitation petition.

ScottGem,

Thank you so much for your help. As of today, the AG has not contacted his attorney. We will continue to work with his attorney. When the child was first borned my husband told her he wanted joint custody and vistiations, she laughed at him and said that will never happen. She told him as long as he's with me he will never see his son.

ScottGem,

Thank you so much for your help. As of today, the AG has not contacted his attorney. We will continue to work with his attorney. When the child was first borned my husband told her he wanted joint custody and vistiations, she laughed at him and said that will never happen. She told him as long as he's with me he will never see his son.

This is why I think this woman needs to be put in her place. She needs to understand that paternity is a double edged sword. While a father has responsibilities to support his progeny, he also has rights to be a part of their life. While I despair that she will make it difficult, if not impossible for him to be a part of the child's life, he can, in turn make life difficult for her.

I am bothered that the AG hasn't been in touch with your attorney. I would make sure your attorney contacts them and arranges for acknowledgement of legal paternity o he can file for custody/visitation.

I will have my husband call his attorney and give him the AG's number so he can call her.

Have you even confirmed that this person claiming to be the AG actually IS the AG ?

From the way they are acting I would say they are not and just someone from the office at best. Once you told them you had representation then they shouldn't be contacting you at all. In fact its illegal to do so.

They could get into huge trouble unless its your side that initiates the call to them. You have representation and you need to use it. Their side records the calls so he needs to be careful of what he says.

Have you even confirmed that this person claiming to be the AG actually IS the AG ?


That was the first question I asked, From post #26

yes, I confirmed it was the AG'S office .

That was the first question I asked, From post #26

In your quote it says she confirmed AG's office. It doesn't say anything about this person being the AG. They can find that information online.

In my dealings with child support offices they will say anything and don't know the law at all. Most are paid minimum wage yet make life changing decisions outside of court orders. They will lie as much as they can to get their way. Its an insane process.

Bottom line is the OP's husband is represented and should be buffered from the AG calling direct.

In your quote it says she confirmed AG's office. It doesnt say anything about this person being the AG.

I don't think she meant the actual AG of Texas called her. I assumed she meant someone representing the AG's office. Some states (and I believe TX is one) include Support enforcement under the AG's office.

If you read the whole thread

Yes,I read the whole thread.
The OP standing is that her husband cannot be held responsible and I am become disgusted with it.

I don't think she meant the actual AG of Texas called her. I assumed she meant someone representing the AG's office. Some states (and I believe TX is one) include Support enforcement under the AG's office.

Wow! You are expecting the AG or even the Governor to call her?Why not Obama??
Bah!

office. It doesnt say anything about this person being the AG. They can find that information online. .

DCSE is a part of GA office!

Yes,I read the whole thread.
The OP standing is that her husband cannot be held responsible and I am become disgusted with it.

I don't know where you are getting that. I don't read that at all. If anyone has said that it was me, based on the fact that he wasn't designated the legal father. The OP has maintained that her husband has tried to pay support and the mother is playing games with him on it.


wow! You are expecting the AG or even the Governor to call her?Why not Obama???
Bah!

You don't seem to be reading this thread correctly. I was saying I assumed it wasn't the actually AG who called but a representative of the office. It was Calfidad who seemed to be thinking it was the actual AG.

Just wanted to give everyone an update... the abondament charges that my husband was arrested for in February was dismissed. We are happy about that and so far the mother has not contacted us in two weeks.

Just wanted to give everyone an update...the abondament charges that my husband was arrested for in febuary was dismissed. We are happy about that and so far the mother has not contacted us in two weeks.

That was the GA case? What about form TX?

We have not heard anything from TX. We asked the lawyer if he heard anything from the AG's office he said no, but he's sure its not over.

Can my husband file charges against her for having him falsly arrested and causing him to miss work and costing us money on bonding him out

can my husband file charges against her for having him falsly arrested and causing him to miss work and costing us money on bonding him out

Frankly, I'm not sure. I would ask your lawyer. Its possible. But it could be a matter that she simply was not aware of the law and might not be liable in that case. You would have to prove that she maliciously and knowingly caused the false arrest. But even more than that, I doubt if she has any money to recoup your husband's losses.

laquency bounds is saying thank you for the information because she is the mistress in this questions. shes a married woman who had an affair with a married man and supposely have a child for this married man....and she thinks its funny...sad...

This bothers me. I found this in another thread you posted. I also found threads from you going back two years about suing your husband's mistress and other questions about your husband's affair.

Are you saying laquency bounds is the mother of the child in question? If so, how do you know?

Seven pages on this thread; three on the other. This entire thing REEKS of troll, especially with the "child's mother" stumbling onto this site, locating these particular threads, knowing who the OP is and then giving her a greenie?

What a waste of time and energy. Time to close.

Yes, laquency bounds is the mother of the child that is in question. How do I know, because when my husband and I was trying to get back together she contacted me by sending me a message on fb saying how she is in love with my husband and I will have the fight of my life to keep him. They met when we were separated... as far as her stumbling on this thread is a shock to me... I received an email when she responded to my post and I'm still trying to figure out how she stumbled across this post... the only thing I can think of is Google different question and that's how she found it.

Yes, laquency bounds is the mother of the child that is in question. How do i know, because when my husband and i was trying to get back together she contacted me by sending me a message on fb saying how she is in love with my husband and i will have the fight of my life to keep him. they met when we were seperated...as far as her stumbling on this thread is a shock to me....i received an email when she responded to my post and im still trying to figure out how she stumbled across this post....the only thing i can think of is google different question and thats how she found it.

I still don't see how you know she is the mother. But yes this is a public board and there is enough for a specific enough search to find.

-And I will answer the rant on the other, closed thread - I am responding to what YOU posted. That's where I got my information.

If you and the mother of the child want to air this fight in public don't be surprised that people have comments to make.

I think this is one man with very strange likes when it comes to women!

Maybe he enjoys the wife and the mistress slugging it out in public.

Well the positive note, if that other person is the child's mother, they are back in Georgia, so they don't have to worry about what is happening in Texas, in fact I think they even have the same internet provider ( different IP address)

Fr chuck, she did say she was moving back to GA so she can handle her business better... so I guess she did moved back to GA! Thanks for that information.

Fr chuck, I promise you I am not betraying to be two people. When I received the email notification saying laquency bounds commented I was shocked... I have no reason to lie and play games. This site has really helped my husband in many ways and if it was not for this site a lot of issues and concerns we had wouldn't have been answered. With the advise I have received from this site helped the abondament charges get dropped. Yes, he has a lawyer, I just like to do my own research. I feel the mother is being messy, because if she was no being messy why would she respond to anything that is being posted. Once she found the site and noticed she was the person in question she should have left it alone, but instead she felt the need to respond and at the end put lmao.. yes, I know this is a public site and anyone can respond, but with this situation she had no need to respond the way she did.

Now that u have invaded my privacy and attempted to announce my location to someone I have taken appropriate actions not to know. I will never use site again

I've removed your post since I warned you about that type of posting. But I will respond to the quoted portion.

No one has invaded your privacy. You CHOSE to post on this site. By doing so, you gave up some of your privacy by posting on a public site. If you are indeed the person referred to in this thread you are free to set the record straight if any facts are incorrect. But you will only allowed to do so if you adhere to the rules of this site.

If you choose not to use this site again, that is also your prerogative.