FRANKZ143
Aug 30, 2010, 04:59 PM
So I am one of those fools that fell for an online scam. That was my fault. But I do not believe my bank did not protect me in any way from keeping this from happening. In fact I think they enabled it. So after I received the "fraud" check in the mail I took it to my bank thinking they could verify if any one can that the check was valid or not. The teller asked how I wanted my bills and handed over the money. A week later I got to take out $50 of my own money not associated in any way with this check and the teller told me that a check had bounced on my account, and that I had a owed amount of $2800 (amount of the check). I asked why was there not verification preformed on the check before the teller just handed over the money? The manager stated that it is often a courtesy for good customers not to verify funds and give the customer the cash. So for being a good customer I get a lack of protection? I would assume that all bank tellers are trained to know when a check is suspicious. Also I know with my other bank, it doesn't matter what type of check it is, even a check from my employer, they put a hold on it for my security and to verify funds. I feel like this bank allowed me to screw myself by not protecting me in an area they are trained to protect me in? Does anyone know how I deal with this issue since the bank closed my account, expects me to pay the full amount back, and ruined my credit so that I cannot open an account anywhere in the us for the next ten years! I didn't get any of the money, filed a police report and tried to resolve the issue with their check fraud agency. Who was very rude as if I had made this check and done this myself. Can I sue my bank for not protecting me? Or for being a good customer and receiving proper security from my bank?