fattom23
Jun 17, 2010, 02:13 PM
The salient facts of the case are this:
1. I went through a very ugly separation about 18 months ago. 1 Child was involved.
2. My ex-wife moved, with my daughter, approximately 8 hours away from our home in Jacksonville, FL into Georgia.
3. I was paying child support of approximately $450 per month through payroll deduction.
4. Due to the child support payments and a suicide attempt, I was evicted from my apartment and moved in with my brother.
5. In March of 2009, I received a final divorce decree in the mail at my brother's stating that my divorce had been finalized, my child support raised to $747 per month, and that I would henceforth be allowed to visit my daughter only if I drove the entire way to my ex-wife's city (instead of meeting halfway which had previously been the agreement), and that I could only have visitation if my mother came with me to pick my daughter up at the police station. The decree stated that the court attempted to inform me at the address they had on file, and that I was not represented because they could not find me. Remember, this decree was sent in the mail to my brother's house, where I had been living the whole time.
My question is this: since my interests were not represented at the hearing due to neither the plaintiff nor the court took what I believe to be reasonable measures to locate me (i.e. calling my known relatives), do I have grounds to hire an attorney and attempt to get the terms of the divorce changed (possibly a reduction in support payments, or at least more favorable visitation rights)? Or have I been hosed with no chance of a more equitable arrangement?
1. I went through a very ugly separation about 18 months ago. 1 Child was involved.
2. My ex-wife moved, with my daughter, approximately 8 hours away from our home in Jacksonville, FL into Georgia.
3. I was paying child support of approximately $450 per month through payroll deduction.
4. Due to the child support payments and a suicide attempt, I was evicted from my apartment and moved in with my brother.
5. In March of 2009, I received a final divorce decree in the mail at my brother's stating that my divorce had been finalized, my child support raised to $747 per month, and that I would henceforth be allowed to visit my daughter only if I drove the entire way to my ex-wife's city (instead of meeting halfway which had previously been the agreement), and that I could only have visitation if my mother came with me to pick my daughter up at the police station. The decree stated that the court attempted to inform me at the address they had on file, and that I was not represented because they could not find me. Remember, this decree was sent in the mail to my brother's house, where I had been living the whole time.
My question is this: since my interests were not represented at the hearing due to neither the plaintiff nor the court took what I believe to be reasonable measures to locate me (i.e. calling my known relatives), do I have grounds to hire an attorney and attempt to get the terms of the divorce changed (possibly a reduction in support payments, or at least more favorable visitation rights)? Or have I been hosed with no chance of a more equitable arrangement?