LaLa61
Feb 14, 2010, 12:50 PM
I have a situation regarding seeking non-related custody of my biological grandson's half brother. The child turned six on Christmas and has lived with me since April of 2007, without contact from his biological father since June of 2007. The mother was my son's girlfriend and they now have a two year old that I did get custody of due to my son and the mother not being together nor living with me anymore and were proven to be unfit at this time.
The father of the child was found and served with my petition in September of 2009; however, DHR maintained custody placing both children in my care calling me foster grandmother of them both, in August 2009. Although the caseworker knew and felt it was in the best interest of both to remain in my custody, the father wanted custody of his child, probably not wanting to be required to pay support to me, the court determined and took him from my residence and placed him with the father in December 2009. (I am still the supervising person for the mother to come to my home for visitation with both of the children.)
As I have stated, the father had not been in touch with us for over two years, yet after just a few short months and a few visits the court said it was in the best interest of the child. How could being in an environment as unstable as theirs be for his best interest? We are presently filing another petition to revise and restate the issues, however, my main concern as it always has been is the child! Why, what and how do I explain to him that he can only visit "home" now and not live here??
The father of the child was found and served with my petition in September of 2009; however, DHR maintained custody placing both children in my care calling me foster grandmother of them both, in August 2009. Although the caseworker knew and felt it was in the best interest of both to remain in my custody, the father wanted custody of his child, probably not wanting to be required to pay support to me, the court determined and took him from my residence and placed him with the father in December 2009. (I am still the supervising person for the mother to come to my home for visitation with both of the children.)
As I have stated, the father had not been in touch with us for over two years, yet after just a few short months and a few visits the court said it was in the best interest of the child. How could being in an environment as unstable as theirs be for his best interest? We are presently filing another petition to revise and restate the issues, however, my main concern as it always has been is the child! Why, what and how do I explain to him that he can only visit "home" now and not live here??