cameramonkey
Dec 18, 2008, 09:36 PM
Background:
we have an office location that has a server rack with 3 or 4 servers plus network gear in a finished furnace room (15x10, 8’ ceilings). The building construction is standard office construction with a drop ceiling and plenum return system. There is one small return vent and one small closeable output on the furnace itself to handle that room (the output is closed now)
Due to poor planning by management, there is no cooling in that room to speak of. They assumed the regular furnace would cool it just fine, even though it was driven by a thermo in another room (and myself and another manager who coincidentally has HVAC experience cried foul). Now that the AC isn't running, the room is getting above 90F on a daily basis. That’s not good for servers. Now they are looking for a solution.
My first thought was to just install a dedicated AC unit and cancel out the waste heat. But then I got to thinking. Why fight it? Why spend even more good $ on electricity when we can “recycle” that waste heat in the winter. Why not duct the heat out into either the living space in the main cube area, or even up into the plenum so that it helps to heat the rest of the office in the winter, and the regular building AC will take care of it the rest of the year.
Ideally, cooled (65F) air would be best for a server room situation, but with as low of a density as we have in this rack regular “shirtsleeve” conditions (75F) are more than acceptable.
Also, leaving the door open results in acceptable temps, but not an acceptable security situation, so we obviously aren't dealing with an outrageous heat situation.
My solution:
-Install a 10" vent fan in the ceiling grid behind the servers (where the heat is exhausted) that pulls approx 800CFM out of the room.
- install a cold air return vent at the floor level in front of the servers (where they intake fresh air) to allow fresh cool air flow from the conditioned space into the room, replacing the hot air.
Yes, I know the traditional answer would be "just cool the room" but that seems wasteful and not too “green”.
OK, OK, I’m not green. Just cheap. It just seems silly for us to pay for the electricity to run the servers, only to have to spend more $$ for electricity to remove heat that is VERY useful more than half the year here in Indiana.
The $64K question:
Since we are dealing with a relatively small amount of heat (less than an estimated 8,000btu/hr) would this even work? If not, why? If so, where would we be best to dump the waste heat; in the conditioned space, or in the plenum across the building from the room (to prevent recirculation)?
we have an office location that has a server rack with 3 or 4 servers plus network gear in a finished furnace room (15x10, 8’ ceilings). The building construction is standard office construction with a drop ceiling and plenum return system. There is one small return vent and one small closeable output on the furnace itself to handle that room (the output is closed now)
Due to poor planning by management, there is no cooling in that room to speak of. They assumed the regular furnace would cool it just fine, even though it was driven by a thermo in another room (and myself and another manager who coincidentally has HVAC experience cried foul). Now that the AC isn't running, the room is getting above 90F on a daily basis. That’s not good for servers. Now they are looking for a solution.
My first thought was to just install a dedicated AC unit and cancel out the waste heat. But then I got to thinking. Why fight it? Why spend even more good $ on electricity when we can “recycle” that waste heat in the winter. Why not duct the heat out into either the living space in the main cube area, or even up into the plenum so that it helps to heat the rest of the office in the winter, and the regular building AC will take care of it the rest of the year.
Ideally, cooled (65F) air would be best for a server room situation, but with as low of a density as we have in this rack regular “shirtsleeve” conditions (75F) are more than acceptable.
Also, leaving the door open results in acceptable temps, but not an acceptable security situation, so we obviously aren't dealing with an outrageous heat situation.
My solution:
-Install a 10" vent fan in the ceiling grid behind the servers (where the heat is exhausted) that pulls approx 800CFM out of the room.
- install a cold air return vent at the floor level in front of the servers (where they intake fresh air) to allow fresh cool air flow from the conditioned space into the room, replacing the hot air.
Yes, I know the traditional answer would be "just cool the room" but that seems wasteful and not too “green”.
OK, OK, I’m not green. Just cheap. It just seems silly for us to pay for the electricity to run the servers, only to have to spend more $$ for electricity to remove heat that is VERY useful more than half the year here in Indiana.
The $64K question:
Since we are dealing with a relatively small amount of heat (less than an estimated 8,000btu/hr) would this even work? If not, why? If so, where would we be best to dump the waste heat; in the conditioned space, or in the plenum across the building from the room (to prevent recirculation)?