joepa
Jun 24, 2006, 07:25 PM
This is a long post, but want to make sure I provide all the details...
My wife and I rented a house for $1000/month in Pennsylvania. We signed a 6 month lease and submitted a $1000 security deposit. We did everything by the book and were great tenants... even putting up with his realtors coming several times a week to show the house (often unannounced). We provided 30-day written notice with a forwarding address and vacated the house as per the terms of the lease after 6 months at the end of January, 2006.
I made an appointment for the landlord to do a final walk through with us, but he didn't show. Later via phone he told me all was good and he would just withhold the final waterbill from the $1000 deposit and return the rest. He also told me that he'd sold the house, so I should not bother filling the fuel oil tank (even though the lease said we were required to leave it with a full tank). This seemed kind of him.
Then it goes sour. The lease states he would return our deposit within 15 days. That didn't happen... so we waited till 30 days passed... still no returned deposit... no written notice, nothing. So I phoned him and he said he would get it right out to us, HOWEVER, that now he was going to take out the cost of a full tank of fuel oil as well as the water bill because the new buyers of the house demanded it. Even though that felt wrong, we just said okay and kindly asked that he get us the remaining deposit ASAP. We never got anything written or otherwise from him.
Many, many phone calls, a letter, even a certified letter (which he refused) AND 6 months later we still don't have our deposit back. He claims he mailed a check a couple months ago but we never saw it and he hasn't even tried to prove it with a cancelled check or anything. Our patience have run out and we now feel very taken advantage of... and think we must sue.
My question is a little vague, but based on the information above and according to my understanding of PA landlord/tenant law, we are now entitled to our full deposit of $1000 since he didn't provide written notice in 30 days of any damages, etc. to be withheld. Also, that if we sue, we would be awarded double the deposit, so $2000.
I just phoned him today and left a message that if we didn't hear from him in the next 2 days and receive a check for the FULL deposit ($1000) in the next week, then we would sue for double as per the law.
He returned that call 10minutes later and got very upset and said that he likes to play hardball and would get his lawyers, let's go to small claims court, he'll up the ante, etc. He said he would testify that the carpets should have been replaced, etc. And said I don't understand the law and he does, he'll come out on top, etc.
I read and reread the law and it seems it is 100% clear and in my favor here. Am I missing anything? Is there anyway he could win if I did sue? Or that he could somehow lie about damages to carpet and cause us to be liable for that?
Sorry for the super long post and questions, I really need some advice... Should I sue and if I do, are there any possible ways it could go bad for me?
Thanks!
Joe
My wife and I rented a house for $1000/month in Pennsylvania. We signed a 6 month lease and submitted a $1000 security deposit. We did everything by the book and were great tenants... even putting up with his realtors coming several times a week to show the house (often unannounced). We provided 30-day written notice with a forwarding address and vacated the house as per the terms of the lease after 6 months at the end of January, 2006.
I made an appointment for the landlord to do a final walk through with us, but he didn't show. Later via phone he told me all was good and he would just withhold the final waterbill from the $1000 deposit and return the rest. He also told me that he'd sold the house, so I should not bother filling the fuel oil tank (even though the lease said we were required to leave it with a full tank). This seemed kind of him.
Then it goes sour. The lease states he would return our deposit within 15 days. That didn't happen... so we waited till 30 days passed... still no returned deposit... no written notice, nothing. So I phoned him and he said he would get it right out to us, HOWEVER, that now he was going to take out the cost of a full tank of fuel oil as well as the water bill because the new buyers of the house demanded it. Even though that felt wrong, we just said okay and kindly asked that he get us the remaining deposit ASAP. We never got anything written or otherwise from him.
Many, many phone calls, a letter, even a certified letter (which he refused) AND 6 months later we still don't have our deposit back. He claims he mailed a check a couple months ago but we never saw it and he hasn't even tried to prove it with a cancelled check or anything. Our patience have run out and we now feel very taken advantage of... and think we must sue.
My question is a little vague, but based on the information above and according to my understanding of PA landlord/tenant law, we are now entitled to our full deposit of $1000 since he didn't provide written notice in 30 days of any damages, etc. to be withheld. Also, that if we sue, we would be awarded double the deposit, so $2000.
I just phoned him today and left a message that if we didn't hear from him in the next 2 days and receive a check for the FULL deposit ($1000) in the next week, then we would sue for double as per the law.
He returned that call 10minutes later and got very upset and said that he likes to play hardball and would get his lawyers, let's go to small claims court, he'll up the ante, etc. He said he would testify that the carpets should have been replaced, etc. And said I don't understand the law and he does, he'll come out on top, etc.
I read and reread the law and it seems it is 100% clear and in my favor here. Am I missing anything? Is there anyway he could win if I did sue? Or that he could somehow lie about damages to carpet and cause us to be liable for that?
Sorry for the super long post and questions, I really need some advice... Should I sue and if I do, are there any possible ways it could go bad for me?
Thanks!
Joe