confuddled
Oct 2, 2008, 09:24 PM
Hello there, I have a question about the Exclusionary rule and exigent circumstances to serving a search warrant.
If police officers point a heat-sensing device at someone's house without a warrant (for the device) and discover, say marijuana or cocaine, and then obtain a warrant for that residence from a magistrate, but serve that warrant without announcing their presence, can the evidence found be used against the defendant?
I am unsure how the Exclusionary rule applies in this mess because the officers got a warrant after having used the sensing device which they did only on a suspicion. Would the resulting evidence be obtained in good faith despite the invalidated technical reasons of the warrant?
Are officers required to announce their presence in exigent circumstances where they fear the defendant would use the delay to destroy the evidence?
I hope that made sense lol.
Thank you, and I hope someone can help with this.
If police officers point a heat-sensing device at someone's house without a warrant (for the device) and discover, say marijuana or cocaine, and then obtain a warrant for that residence from a magistrate, but serve that warrant without announcing their presence, can the evidence found be used against the defendant?
I am unsure how the Exclusionary rule applies in this mess because the officers got a warrant after having used the sensing device which they did only on a suspicion. Would the resulting evidence be obtained in good faith despite the invalidated technical reasons of the warrant?
Are officers required to announce their presence in exigent circumstances where they fear the defendant would use the delay to destroy the evidence?
I hope that made sense lol.
Thank you, and I hope someone can help with this.