What does :rolleyes: 2+ prose parties when cases closed and dismissed- lack of juris. w/o prejudice mean?

Hi, francesflores!

Greetings and WELCOME to the site! I just moved your question that you had posted in Introductions to this topic area so that it would get the most exposure to those who are best able to answer it. Introductions is for people to introduce themselves and we try to not ask questions there.

We would appreciate it if you would return to Introductions sometime to tell us a little about yourself though, if you would be willing to do that.

Also, would you mind rephrasing your question a little? It's a little hard to understand exactly what you are wanting to know.

Thanks!

what does :rolleyes: 2+ prose parties when cases closed and dismissed- lack of juris. w/o prejudice mean?



Lack of jurisdiction means the papers were filed in the wrong Court.

Without prejudice means a case has been dismissed but the Plaintiff is granted permission to a new suit on the same claim.

(With prejudice means the suit is dead, cannot be brought a second time.)

It isn't prose - It's Pro se. It means a party is not represented by an Attorney. If you appear, representing yourself, you are Pro se.

I have no idea about the 2+ unless it means both or all parties did not have Attorneys.

Hi, francesflores!

Greetings and WELCOME to the site! I just moved your question that you had posted in Introductions to this topic area so that it would get the most exposure to those who are best able to answer it. Introductions is for people to introduce themselves and we try to not ask questions there.

We would appreciate it if you would return to Introductions sometime to tell us a little about yourself though, if you would be willing to do that.

Also, would you mind rephrasing your question a little? It's a little hard to understand exactly what you are wanting to know.

Thanks!



She's asking for legal definitions -