PDA

View Full Version : Solving Composite Functions


Tyan Bekooy
Dec 4, 2007, 11:48 AM
Evaluate gh(-4)

g(x)= (4x+4)5
h(x)= -1/3 (-x+5)

I'm not getting the right answer.
would any oneeeee help me ?

xx

asterisk_man
Dec 4, 2007, 02:05 PM
Can you show your work so far?

Tyan Bekooy
Dec 4, 2007, 02:12 PM
hmmm.
apparently I do it kind of differently from the standard one,
so I'm not sureee if you'll understand.
but here it goes..

g(x)= (4x+4)5
h(x)= -1/3 (-x+5)
= 1/3x -5/3

gh(x)= g(1/3x -5/3)
= 4 (1/3x - 5/3) +4 All Over 5
= 4/3x - 20/3 + 4/1 All Over 5
= 4/3x - 20/3 + 20/5 All over 5
= 4/3x -20/3 - 20 All over 5
gh (-4) = 4/3(-4) -20/3 -20 All over 5
= -16/3 -20/3 -20 All over 5
= -36/3 -20 All over 5
= -12 - 20 Over 5
= -36/5

And the answer is supposed to be
-1.6 or -8/5...

asterisk_man
Dec 5, 2007, 07:05 AM
Thanks for showing your work! :)

Since you want to solve for when x=-4 you don't need to do it the hard way and pull the x all the way through. Just substitute the -4 straight away and it will be much easier.


g\left(x\right)= \frac {4x+4} 5 \\
h\left(x\right)= -\frac 1 3 \left(-x+5\right)\\
g\left(h\left(-4\right)\right)=? \\
\\
h\left(-4\right)=-\frac 1 3 \left(4+5\right)=-3 \\
g\left(h\left(-4\right)\right)=g\left(-3\right)=\frac {-12+4} 5 = -\frac 8 5 = -1.6


Hope this helps!

Now, your method will work also... but you have an error. I'm not sure why you converted the 4 into a 20/5, that was OK but of no use. But for some reason you then converted the 20/5 into a 20, that is your error. If you had left it as 4 or 20/5 you would have gotten 8/5.

Elisha Grey
Jan 19, 2009, 03:29 PM
h(-4) = -1/3(-(-4)+5) = -1/3(9) = -3
gh(4) = g(-3) = (4(-3)+4)5 = (-8)5 = -40

Samantha16
Sep 21, 2010, 05:01 PM
g(x)=3x/x+1
Find 1) g2(x) 2)g3(x)

Unknown008
Sep 22, 2010, 02:14 AM
Hello Samantha16, it would be good if you started your own thread.

g(x) = \frac{3x}{x+1}

Find
1) g^2(x)
2) g^3(x)

g^2(x) = g(g(x)) = g(\frac{3x}{x+1})

Can you continue now? :)

Do the same thing, but a little further for the second one. Post what you get! :)

evie12
Dec 23, 2010, 08:46 AM
Hello, umm I've got an alevel question and wanted to know what the answer is but but can't find the mark scheme;

f(x) = 2e(power x) domain minus infin. To infin.

g(x) = 3lnx domain [1, infin.)

a) Explain why gf(-1) does not exist?
b) Find its simplest form an expression for fg(X). State the domain and range of fg.

fg(X) = 2e(to the power of)3lnx
= 2(3x)
= 6x

but don't know the domain and range or part a!


Thanks :)

Unknown008
Dec 23, 2010, 11:50 AM
You could have posted a new thread for this...

Anay, I wanted to confirm the question.

f(x) = 2e^x

g(x) = 3 \ln(x)

And a) asks to show that gf(-1) does not exist?

And b) asks to simplify fg(x)

If so...

a) Does exist it seems...

gf(x) = g(2e^x) = 3 \ln (2e^x) = 3 (\ln(2) + \ln(e^x)) = 3\ln(2) + 3x

Which is a straight line... in case it's the inverse, that too would exist.

b) You didn't do it correctly, I'm afraid.

fg(x) = f(3\ln(x)) = 2e^{3\ln(x)} = 2e^{\ln(x^3)} = 2x^3

And since this function usually exists from -infinity to +infinity, you have to take the smallest domain that you were given, that is [1, + infinity)

The range is then calculated. What is fg(x) at x = 1. From there, you get your lowest value, until infinity. You range is thus from that value to positive infinity.