As I have not read the Bible nor done a comparative study,I wonder what the Bible says about Muhammad.

I believe that the original Armeniac(hope that is the right spelling) Bible will have some mention of our Prophet (pbuh)
I was wondering about the Bibles available today.

I have read different articles regarding this and I found that it seems that there is a verse in Isaiah about a book being revealed to an unlettered person and is asked to read when it is replied that he is not learned.

This seems to match with the description of Muhammad(pbuh) because he was unlettered and he was asked to recite,but replies that he is unlettered.

Could someone give reference for this, or am I wrong.

Thank you.

This site would agree with you that Muhammad was mentioned in the Old Testament -
Old-Testament describes Him (http://www.islambyquestions.net/Prophet/Testament.htm)

This site would not agree - Are There Predictions of Muhammad in the Old Testament? (http://debate.org.uk/topics/trtracts/t05.htm)

For myself, that was never in any of my religious upbringing, no matter which denomination I belonged to. I do not mean to offend you in any way, but I cannot see it.

Thanks shy,
Opinion is opinion, no offense taken:)

As I said it could be that the original book mentioned him (pbuh),but in present Bibles it might not be there.
Most of the articles I read were referring to a Hebrew Bible.

I think the language you are looking for is Aramaic. Only a very few portions of the Bible were written in Aramaic. Most was written in Hebrew(Old Testament) or Greek (New Testament). The Bible does not mention Muhammad. The Verse you referred to is Isaiah 29:11-12.

I have never had the privilege of learning from a Hebrew Bible. Now if someone who is Jewish and versed in the Old Testament would come and answer this, I would gladly listen.

Shy,
Thanks for your input though.

I too am hoping someone with knowledge of Hebrew could provide some insight.

I do not ask because I am in doubt,but it has been mentioned in the Quran that the previous scriptures has the glad tidings of our Prophet(pbuh).
And as I know there quite a few on this site well versed in the old scriptures, why not get some insight into this topic.

I'm sure if you're determined, you can find something somewhere in the Bible that you can interpret as a prophecy about Muhammad. My question is, why would you bother?

Why is it necessary to write (pbuh) after every mention of the Prophet? Is it some kind of rule or something? And I notice you have another thing you write after every mention of Jesus. What's up with that?

Are you kidding me? I have never read anything in the Torah specifically positive concerning Muhammed. Not one single parashah in all the Shabbos ever! There are scriptures warning against false prophets in general though.

Since this is the Christianity board the following link is from the Christian's perspective:


Muhammad's False Prophecies (http://www.answering-islam.de/Main/Shamoun/false_prophecies.htm)




Bobby

I don't think there is anything in the bible about him.

Well as what I know Muhammad is the last sent prophet accrdg to Islam faith. His d next one to Jesus. Its true he is unlettered, that's y God sent an angel to him to whisper what GOd message to everybody. In christian faith Muhammad doesn't exist bcoz they cut their history on Jesus alone. But to the Quran, the history still continue on muhammad the last prophet.. Jesus to Islam faith is just a prophet, his name is Prohet Isah. They respect him same as Muhammad.. no offense mean.

I'm sure if you're determined, you can find something somewhere in the Bible that you can interpret as a prophecy about Muhammad. My question is, why would you bother?

Why is it necessary to write (pbuh) after every mention of the Prophet? Is it some kind of rule or something? And I notice you have another thing you write after every mention of Jesus. What's up with that?

Pbuh-Peace be upon him-abbreviation in english for the words sallallahu alaihi wasallam, which means "May the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him." When the name of Prophet Muhammad is mentioned, Muslims show respect to him by reciting this statement of peace.
After all other Prophets and angels names we say-Alaihi salaam-means may peace be upon him in order to show respect.

About bothering to find out if a previous scripture mentions Muhammad (pbuh) is not something I am trying to force anyone to see or find, it is just for my reference.

As I said before the Quran mentions that he(pbuh) was mentioned in the previous scriptures and I accept/believe that, I was inquiring about the present day Bibles.


Are you kidding me?! I have never read anything in the Torah specifically positive concerning Muhammed. Not one single parashah in all the Shabbos ever! There are scriptures warning against false prophets in general though.

Since this is the Christianity board the following link is from the Christian's perspective:


Muhammad's False Prophecies (http://www.answering-islam.de/Main/Shamoun/false_prophecies.htm)

Bobby

Thanks for that link Bobby.

I was just wondering isn't Jesus(alaihi salaam)mentioned in the Torah, but yet from what I know Jews do not accept him as Prophet.
Could you shed some light on that, is my information wrong?

I was just wondering isnt Jesus mentioned in the Torah, but yet from what I know Jews do not accept him as Prophet.
Could you shed some light on that, is my information wrong?

Why would you think that Jesus is mentioned in the Torah, if as you claim in the original question, you have not read the Bible? Now as for Jesus being mentioned, not according to Rabbinical Judaism. However, Jesus is read about in the Christian New Testament.



Bobby

Why would you think that Jesus is mentioned in the Torah, if as you claim in the original question, you have not read the Bible?! Now as for Jesus being mentioned, not according to Rabbinical Judaism. However, Jesus is read about in the Christian New Testament.



Bobby

Is the Christian New Testament used by Jews too?

I have not read the Bible, but I do read different articles written by different people regarding the monotheistic faiths.


Do bear with my ignorance on Jewish scriptures and Christian Scriptures.

As I said before the Quran mentions that he(pbuh) was mentioned in the previous scriptures and I accept/believe that, I was inquiring about the present day Bibles.
Does it say specifically which of the "previous scriptures" he (pbuh) is mentioned in? If it says that it is in the Torah, specifically, then I guess you are duty bound to find a reference there; if it's not specific, I guess all scriptures from all the world's religions are open to your search.

Jews find no references to either Jesus or Muhammad in the Torah. Christians find references to Jesus, but not Muhammad. I'm sure Muslims can, if they wish, find references to both, not only in the Torah, but in the New Testament, the Upanishads, the Bhagavad Gita, the Tibetan Book of the Dead, the Tao Teh King or any other text that is accepted as scripture by any religion whatsoever. Prophecy is in the eye of the beholder.

Is the Christian New Testament used by Jews too?
NO.

Does it say specifically which of the "previous scriptures" he (pbuh) is mentioned in? If it says that it is in the Torah, specifically, then I guess you are duty bound to find a reference there; if it's not specific, I guess all scriptures from all the world's religions are open to your search.

Jews find no references to either Jesus or Muhammad in the Torah. Christians find references to Jesus, but not Muhammad. I'm sure Muslims can, if they wish, find references to both, not only in the Torah, but in the New Testament, the Upanishads, the Bhagavad Gita, the Tibetan Book of the Dead, the Tao Teh King or any other text that is accepted as scripture by any religion whatsoever. Prophecy is in the eye of the beholder.

NO.

Quran chapter 7;verse 157
"Those who follow the Messenger, the Prophet who can neither read nor write (i.e.Muhammad SAW) whom they find written with them in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) , - he commands them for Al-Ma'rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has ordained); and forbids them from Al-Munkar (i.e. disbelief, polytheism of all kinds, and all that Islâm has forbidden); he allows them as lawful At-Taiyibât [(i.e. all good and lawful) as regards things, deeds, beliefs, persons, foods, etc.], and prohibits them as unlawful Al-Khabâ'ith (i.e. all evil and unlawful as regards things, deeds, beliefs, persons, foods, etc.), he releases them from their heavy burdens (of Allâh's Covenant), and from the fetters (bindings) that were upon them. So those who believe in him (Muhammad SAW), honour him, help him, and follow the light (the Qur'ân) which has been sent down with him, it is they who will be successful"

"Prophecy is in the eye of the beholder", is that sarcasm I sense...

"Prophecy is in the eye of the beholder", is that sarcasm I sense....
No, just a recognition that we can always find whatever we feel compelled to find. The danger in over-reliance on holy books is that it's so easy to overlook our own role in interpreting what we read, so that we come away convinced that God agrees with us, when in reality all we have done is dress our preconceptions up in fancy clothes.

No, just a recognition that we can always find whatever we feel compelled to find. The danger in over-reliance on holy books is that it's so easy to overlook our own role in interpreting what we read, so that we come away convinced that God agrees with us, when in reality all we have done is dress our preconceptions up in fancy clothes.

Ok,
Sorry if I misunderstood.

About being convinced that God agrees with us, for me I find that I am not trying to dress my preconceptions with what the Almighty has revealed.
But I submit and bow down to His guidelines, and His revelations and His Messengers and Prophets(peace be upon them all) and accept His decree in all matters.

So I am not trying to twist things to fit my needs and views,
But I am just researching for knowledge sake because Allah always asks the believers to ask and find out from those in the know about some of the matters we do not know.Like the sciences, original scriptures of the people of the Book(Jews and Christians) etc.

Quran chapter 7;verse 157
"Those who follow the Messenger, the Prophet who can neither read nor write (i.e.Muhammad SAW) whom they find written with them in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) , ....

Let's start here. I could go to other references in the Koran also which points to the Christian gospel. So, that being the case, why have you not taken the time to go to the gospel and see what it says? If the Koran points to the gospel then why don't we look at what the gospel has to say.

Here is the Apostle Paul's summary of the gospel:

1 Cor 15:1-11
15:1 Moreover, brethren, I declare to you the gospel which I preached to you, which also you received and in which you stand, 2 by which also you are saved, if you hold fast that word which I preached to you--unless you believed in vain. 3 For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, 4 and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures, 5 and that He was seen by Cephas, then by the twelve. 6 After that He was seen by over five hundred brethren at once, of whom the greater part remain to the present, but some have fallen asleep. 7 After that He was seen by James, then by all the apostles. 8 Then last of all He was seen by me also, as by one born out of due time. 9 For I am the least of the apostles, who am not worthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God. 10 But by the grace of God I am what I am, and His grace toward me was not in vain; but I labored more abundantly than they all, yet not I, but the grace of God which was with me. 11 Therefore, whether it was I or they, so we preach and so you believed.
NKJV

Let's start here. I could go to other references in the Koran also which points to the Christian gospel. So, that being the case, why have you not taken the time to go to the gospel and see what it says? If the Koran points to the gospel then why don't we look at what the gospel has to say.

Here is the Apostle Paul's summary of the gospel:

1 Cor 15:1-11
15:1 Moreover, brethren, I declare to you the gospel which I preached to you, which also you received and in which you stand, 2 by which also you are saved, if you hold fast that word which I preached to you--unless you believed in vain. 3 For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, 4 and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures, 5 and that He was seen by Cephas, then by the twelve. 6 After that He was seen by over five hundred brethren at once, of whom the greater part remain to the present, but some have fallen asleep. 7 After that He was seen by James, then by all the apostles. 8 Then last of all He was seen by me also, as by one born out of due time. 9 For I am the least of the apostles, who am not worthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God. 10 But by the grace of God I am what I am, and His grace toward me was not in vain; but I labored more abundantly than they all, yet not I, but the grace of God which was with me. 11 Therefore, whether it was I or they, so we preach and so you believed.
NKJV

Thanks,

I do not need to study and learn the Bibles in existence today in such detail,nor do I have to believe in the crucification of Jesus(alaihi salaam),because the Quran states otherwise.

I just needed to know references made regarding Muhammad (pbuh)in the scriptures.

Thanks,

I do not need to study and learn the Bibles in existence today in such detail,nor do I have to believe in the crucification of Jesus(alaihi salaam),because the Quran states otherwise.

I just needed to know references made regarding Muhammad (pbuh)in the scriptures.

Al-Imran 3:3 He has sent down upon thee the Book with the truth, confirming what was before it; and He sent down the Law Torah and the Gospel (of Jesus) aforetime, as guidance to the people, and He sent down Salvation.

Since the gospel came from God for the guidance and salvation of mankind according to the Koran, how can you deny its importance?

...how can you deny its importance?

As I am not a scholar,but a student of knowledge...
Here is an answer on Islams views on the Gospel/s.
----------------------------------
http://www.readingislam.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1123996015484&pagename=IslamOnline-English-AAbout_Islam/AskAboutIslamE/AskAboutIslamE

First of all, I would like to clear a misunderstanding among certain Muslims, which some Christian missionaries are trying to take undue advantage of: The Muslims do not believe that the Torah and Bible are lost, that they are completely lost. The Qur'anic position about the Torah and Bible is very clear. Here, I would like to point out that it is well attested by learned Christian scholars too. That is, the Books of God as revealed to Moses and Jesus do not exist now in the original form and language.

Many Muslims misunderstand that the Christian Old Testament is the Torah. This is not true. The first five books of the Old Testament, often called the Pentateuch (the Five Books), contain some of the ideas in the original Torah - that is all. The language of the original Torah was ancient Hebrew; now nobody speaks that language. The first five books of the Old Testament contain ideas from the original Torah and also stories, which could have never been part of the divinely revealed Book. So the Jewish or Christian Torah contains some parts of the Original Torah, as well as other things.

The same is the case of the Bible. It was revealed to Jesus by God, in Jesus' own language of Aramaic, which is a Semitic language, an eastern language similar to Hebrew and Arabic. The “original” extant copies of the gospels are in Greek, a western language. Now there are four gospels, supposed to have been written by four of the disciples of Jesus: Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. Was Jesus quoting, from these Greek books, written many years after his disappearance when he was addressing his people? Certainly not! He was quoting from the Book he received from God, which was the original Bible in the language of his own people. The argument that God revealed his Bible to Jesus in Greek is like saying that God revealed the Qur'an to Muhammad in English!

So the original Gospel was not in Greek, it was in the language Jesus and his people spoke and understood. We have no record or evidence to indicate that; this original Gospel was written down by scribes under Jesus' own supervision. I repeat: We have no original Gospel existing now as a single volume, in the original language. Every educated Christian must know this fact! (Those who are in doubt can go to the Jerome Biblical Commentary, or any authentic book by genuine scholars that deal with the subject. Nevertheless, missionaries give the impression that this is only a baseless charge by Muslims.

Instead of the original Gospel, we have four books written by persons who are supposed to have been Jesus' disciples. I say 'supposed', because modern scholars who have done research on the subject, question the claim that these were the disciples of Jesus, in the first place. These four books called the Gospels are placed at the beginning of some 27 books, bound together into one volume, called The New Testament. Out of these 27 books, thirteen were written by a man called St. Paul. This Paul was not a disciple of Jesus, nor has Jesus met him, as he himself testifies. Modern Christians are ardent followers of St. Paul, even in cases where Paul clearly contradicts Jesus!

The Islamic request to Christians is just this: Please follow Jesus, don't follow Paul, who preaches a different gospel! The Islamic belief about the present Book, which the Christians use as “the word of God”, called the New Testament is that it is not the Gospel of Jesus mentioned in the Qur'an. Still, Muslims believe that the Gospels in the bible contain some teachings of Jesus, as well as the interpretations of the writers of those books, whoever they might have been. Also Muslims believe that in the words quoted from Jesus in these gospels, you come across certain ideas, which he received from God too. So the New Testament (particularly the Gospels) is valuable to the Muslims. It is valuable in that there is the “word of God” in it, exactly as the Old Testament (particularly the Pentateuch) is valuable to Muslims in that it contains also the “word of God” in it.

There is a couple of things that we must understand about God commanding Muslims to go to Christians or Jews and ask them about any particular point, to verify whether it is in their books.
God wants to make Muslims, as well as the People of the Book, understand the continuity of Divine Guidance.

He wants to encourage understanding and dialogue between Muslims and others, for Allah knows best.

The Qur'an does not say anywhere that the older scriptures remained pure and free from corruption. On the contrary, the Qur'an very clearly says that they have been corrupted. One of the functions of the Qur'an is to confirm the truth that is left in the older scriptures, even after many interpolations and revisions have affected substantial changes in them.

The Qur'anic position about the previous scriptures is clarified in the following verse:

To thee We sent the Scripture in truth, confirming the scripture that came before it, and guarding it in safety: so judge between them by what God hath revealed, and follow not their vain desires, diverging from the Truth that hath come to thee. To each among you have we prescribed a law and an open way. If God had so willed, He would have made you a single people, but (His plan is) to test you in what He hath given you: so strive as in a race in all virtues. The goal of you all is to God; it is He that will show you the truth of the matters in which ye dispute;

Surah 5 Verse 48
This verse means that the Qur'an confirms the truth that remains in the former scriptures. The Arabic word translated, “Watcher over” is Muhaymin, which clearly indicates that the Qur'an confirms only the truth in the previous books. That the keepers of the previous books had distorted them is made clear in another verse:

Then woe to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say:"This is from God," to traffic with it for miserable price!- Woe to them for what their hands do write, and for the gain they make thereby.

Surah 2 Verse 79
From these two verses, it is quite clear that the Qur'an does not support the Christian claim that the Torah and the Bible remain uncorrupted all through history. What is more, this is not a claim they can maintain in the light of their own scripture:

“How can you say, 'We are wise, and the law of the Lord is with us'? But behold, the lying pen of the scribes has made it into a lie” (Jeremiah 8:8, quoted from the New American Standard Bible).

Here the Prophet Jeremiah is scolding the Israelites that their corrupt scribes have made the Law of the Lord (that is the Torah) into a lie by their 'lying pen' (that is the pen they used to change the verses). This proof in the Book, the People of the Book are carrying, clearly establishes that their Book has been corrupted by their own scribes.

We have good evidence in the Gospels themselves that Jesus was using the original Bible for his preaching. He used to refer to it as The Gospel of the Kingdom:
“And Jesus went about all Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, and preaching the gospel of the kingdom, and healing all manner of sickness and all manner of disease among the people.” (Matthew 4: 23)

Here it is said that Jesus preached the Gospel of the Kingdom. Ask those Christian disputants whether Jesus was preaching one of the four Canonical gospels included in the Bible in 325 C.E, written not in Jesus' own Aramaic language, but in the western language of Greek, at least thirty years after his alleged crucifixion. It is so obvious that no Christian scholar, worth his salt, can deny the fact that the present gospels contain the words of God, the words of Jesus and the words of the writer. That means that they are not fully God's word. The Islamic belief is also the same.

continued in next post
--------------------------------------

----------------
continued from above post

Now let us turn specifically to the Qur'anic verses you quoted:

First,
All food was lawful to the Children of Israel, except what Israel Made unlawful for itself, before the Law (of Moses) was revealed. Say: "Bring ye the Law and study it, if ye be men of truth."
Surah 3 Verse 93

Second,
If thou wert in doubt as to what We have revealed unto thee, then ask those who have been reading the Book from before thee: the Truth hath indeed come to thee from thy Lord: so be in no wise of those in doubt.
Surah 10 Verse 94

We must understand that these verses were originally addressed to the Prophet and his contemporaries. They had no means of knowing many of the ideas, which were being revealed to them by God. This is because there were so many things new to them, particularly about Jews and Christians, which were already really confusing to those polytheists or ex-polytheists of Mecca and Madinah. I believe (Allah knows best), it is to these people that the verses are primarily addressed.

"The truth hath indeed come to thee from thy Lord: so be in no wise of those in doubt" - is clearly addressed to those who doubt, or to those who are likely to have some doubts. It is only natural for humans to have all kinds of doubts and questions, arising in the mind, especially in the light of so much of new material. It seems the Christian argument is that we are commanded not to doubt the Christian claims. However, as we have seen, this is not what the Qur'an commands us to do.

May Allah guide us to truth!

Mr. Lamaan Ball, editor of Ask About Islam, adds:

We are told in the Qur'an only to verify that what is in the Qur'an agrees with some extant verses of the Bible. The Muslims can quote the Bible, because they believe there is some truth in it. But we need to be clear: we understand that there is also falsehood there, which is wrongly presented as truth. By quoting the Bible we can show that the Qur'an confirms teachings already present in the earlier books. We must however always be clear that we are not asserting anything else about the remaining contents of those earlier books.
----------------------------------------------

Spirit is transcendent to the mind as the ionosphere is transcendent to the troposphere.

Language, especially written language, is a function of the intellect, i.e. the logical, rational mind.

Too often our preoccupation with words on paper so completely captures our attention that we fail to notice the present action of Spirit beyond the surface of our mind. This is the great danger of holy books, not that they are wrong or corrupted, but that they tempt us to stay safely in the mind and become deaf to the present workings of Spirit. Thus we are seduced into "bibliolatry"--making an idol of books, measuring all spiritual input against our previously established (mental, logical) interpretation of the holy book, effectively blocking further guidance and inspiration.

I don't know of any Muhammed in the bible =)

Firmbeliever,

Your copy and paste response to my comment did not address the point that I made. It expressed many different opinions, attacked the Bible, but did not provide any validation for any of the points.

Please look at my message once again. I am looking to have a dicussion with you, not to trade copy and paste articles from the internet.

Tj3

Firmbeliever,

Your copy and paste response to my comment did not address the point that I made. It expressed many different opinions, attacked the Bible, but did not provide any validation for any of the points.

Please look at my message once again. I am looking to have a dicussion with you, not to trade copy and paste articles from the internet.

Tj3

I do not believe in the current Bibles, if that was what you are asking.

I believe the original scriptures were revealed for that time and for certain people/nations.
The Quran I believe is the final revelation confirming all the truths that did exist in the original scriptures that were revealed before and the Quran is for all of mankind and jinn until the end of this world.

I hope that clears what you were asking about.

I do not believe in the current Bibles, if that was what you are asking.

The Bible has not changed. We have plenty of evidence of the accuracy of the gospel that we have today is the same as when Mohammed was alive, so if he was pointing you to the gospel, then why do you reject it?

If you believe that the Bible has chnagedm bring forward your evidence.


I believe the original scriptures were revealed for that time and for certain people/nations.

Even that passage that I quoted from the Koran disagrees with you on that point.

The Bible have not changed. We have plenty of evidence of the accuracy of the gospel that we have today is the same as when Mohammed was alive, so if he was pointing you to the gospel, then why do you reject it?

If you believe that the Bible has chnagedm bring forward your evidence.



Even that passage that I quoted from the Koran disagrees with you on that point.

The Quran is not talking about the Bible that existed during Muhammad's(pbuh) time,because the original books had already been changed long before that.
It is about the original revelations during the time of Jesus(alaihi salaam).

Another thing is Muhammad(pbuh) is not the one writing the Quran, he is an iliterate person and it was revelation from the Almighty that Muhammad(pbuh)passed down to those who memorised it and wrote it all down.

And do bear in mind that whatever you tell me otherwise, my mind will not change about accepting the scriptures that exist today,
Because I believe even if it contains some of the truths from the time they were revealed,I do not accept all of what exists today as the truth.

As the Quran already has the truths that was in the previous scriptures, I do not need to accept and believe in the current Bible/s.I just need to follow the Quran and the Sunnah(way of conduct) of the Prophet Muhammad(pbuh).

The Quran is not talking about the Bible that existed during Muhammad's(pbuh) time,because the original books had already been changed long before that.


Please post your proof of this claim. I ask because I am sure that you know that we now have many very ancient manuscripts. Further, if it had aleready changed before Mohammeds time, why did he say nothing about that? Why did he tell people to go to the gospel and the Torah? That would make no sense if the right gospel and Torah were not longer available.


Another thing is Muhammad(pbuh) is not the one writing the Quran, he is an iliterate person and it was revelation from the Almighty that Muhammad(pbuh)passed down to those who memorised it and wrote it all down.

That is a claim, and many such claims are made by many people who claim to be prophets, but the test is in examining their works, which is what we are doing right now.



And do bear in mind that whatever you tell me otherwise, my mind will not change about accepting the scriptures that exist today,
Because I believe even if it contains some of the truths from the time they were revealed,I do not accept all of what exists today as the truth.

I am not asking you to change your mind. I am asking you to discuss the topic with me, and to provide the evidence for your claims. I am sure that, like me, you want the truth - isn't that right? And the evidence should support the truth. If you are right, the evidence should only strengthen your claim.

Please post your proof of this claim. I ask because I am sure that you know that we now have many very ancient manuscripts. Further, if it had aleready changed before Mohammeds time, why did he say nothing about that? Why did he tell people to go to the gospel and the Torah? That would make no sense if the right gospel and Torah were not longer available.

That is a claim, and many such claims are made by many people who claim to be prophets, but the test is in examining their works, which is what we are doing right now.

I am not asking you to change your mind. I am asking you to discuss the topic with me, and to provide the evidence for your claims. I am sure that, like me, you want the truth - isn't that right? And the evidence should support the truth. If you are right, the evidence should only strengthen your claim.

I think I would like to refrain from this discussion as it would get me or you nowhere, because I believe what I believe with or without proof.

About claims of Muhammad(pbuh)being the last and final messenger from the Almighty, I believe it without a doubt even if I cannot convince you or others of this.

As a firmbeliever in Islam,I do not need confirmation from books other than the Quran and the Sunnah of the Prophet(pbuh) to live my life as a good muslim.

I did not start this thread to find out if I was following the truth(I already believe I am) or to confirm the Quran.
My question was asked because I read an article that said the Bible mentions an unlettered Prophet in a chapter/verse called Isaiah.I just wanted to know if this was true and if this was in reference to Muhammad(pbuh).And this question has already been answered.

And please do not tell me that you need to see proof of my claims just to know the truth.Your mind is already made up that Islam and the Quran and Muhammad(pbuh) is just a manmade religion with a man calling people to it with a book composed by man and you wish to prove to me that yours is the true faith.

Another thing is that I am only a muslim, not a scholar to pull up proofs of everything I say regarding my faith.I am still learning and will be learning until I die.
I do not wish to discuss things when I have limited knowledge of it and you already said not to post articles from others(scholars or otherwise) in answer to your questions.
I do not like writing about or talking about matters I am not 100% sure of, which is why I give reference to different articles which does show my views with a better explanation.

I think I would like to refrain from this discussion as it would get me or you nowhere, because I believe what I believe with or without proof.

About claims of Muhammad(pbuh)being the last and final messenger from the Almighty, I believe it without a doubt even if I cannot convince you or others of this.

As a firmbeliever in Islam,I do not need confirmation from books other than the Quran and the Sunnah of the Prophet(pbuh) to live my life as a good muslim.

I did not start this thread to find out if I was following the truth(I already believe I am) or to confirm the Quran.

I did not ask you that, but since you raised the topic, it seemed like a good time to examine the evidence for the truth of the Koran. You may believe and you may be convinced, but without evidence, no one else is going to believe it to be true. Indeed, I just asked you some questions and you then made claims challenging my belief.


And please do not tell me that you need to see proof of my claims just to know the truth.Your mind is already made up that Islam and the Quran and Muhammad(pbuh) is just a manmade religion with a man calling people to it with a book composed by man and you wish to prove to me that yours is the true faith.

I am always prepared to allow my faith to be challenged because I want to follow the truth wherever it may lead. I think that if all people took this approach that it would go a long way to ending battles between religions, because we would no longer hold to a religion, right or wrong, but we would follow truth.


Another thing is that I am only a muslim, not a scholar to pull up proofs of everything I say regarding my faith.I am still learning and will be learning until I die.


I do not like writing about or talking about matters I am not 100% sure of, which is why I give reference to different articles which does show my views with a better explanation.

Why do you believe then if you do not have proof that it is true or are not 100% sure of?

I find that if I allow my faith to be challenged, one of two things happens. Either I find that I am right, and now I can better defend my faith - or I am wrong in which case I have come closer to the full truth. Either way I win. Consider.

The Quran I believe is the final revelation

Well, that certainly does simplify things for you, I can see that.

I did not ask you that, but since you raised the topic, it seemed like a good time to examine the evidence for the truth of the Koran. You may believe and you may be convinced, but without evidence, no one else is going to believe it to be true. Indeed, i just asked you some questions and you then made claims challenging my belief.

I am always prepared to allow my faith to be challenged because I want to follow the truth wherever it may lead. I think that if all people took this approach that it would go a long way to ending battles between religions, because we would no longer hold to a religion, right or wrong, but we would follow truth.

Why do you believe then if you do not have proof that it is true or are not 100% sure of?

I find that if I allow my faith to be challenged, one of two things happens. Either I find that I am right, and now I can better defend my faith - or I am wrong in which case i have come closer to the full truth. Either way I win. Consider.

Being 100% sure of my beliefs is very different from being able to explain and show proof 100% to another.
I am 100% sure of my own beliefs,but I am not 100% sure of being able to show proof and convince a sceptic that what I believe is the truth.

I do not have to defend my belief to anyone, I am answerable only to the Almighty.

So if I already believe I follow the truth whatever others might say to the contrary,I do not have to change my views just to please others or to convince others of my belief.

When I know I follow the truth,why would I need to accept or change my views just because someone else thinks it is not the truth.

If you are unsure of your faith, then I think it is your choice to look for answers elsewhere in other religions.I am sure of my faith and I do not need to look elsewhere.

You can challenge Islam all your like,but I am not the person to take up challenges when I know I have limited knowledge to counteract your arguments.

Being 100% sure of my beliefs is very different from being able to explain and show proof 100% to another.
I am 100% sure of my own beliefs,but I am not 100% sure of being able to show proof and convince a sceptic that what I believe is the truth.


So if I already believe I follow the truth whatever others might say to the contrary,I do not have to change my views just to please others or to convince others of my belief.

Firmbeliever, what I was showing you came from the Koran. If you believe that the Koran is 100% right, then surely you must agree that what I quoted must also be right when it tells you that the Christian gospel was given for your salvation and guidance. What I do not understand is that you are getting defensive about your beliefs, however all I did was go to your scripture and point out what it said.

It was you who started challenging my beliefs. Surely if you choose to challenge the beliefs of another, you must expect that you will be asked to validate your claims.

firmbeliever, what I was showing you came from the Koran. If you believe that the Koran is 100% right, then surely you must agree that what I quoted must also be right when it tells you that the Christian gospel was given for your salvation and guidance. What I do not understand is that you are getting defensive about your beliefs, however all I did was go to your scripture and point out what it said.

It was you who started challenging my beliefs. Surely if you choose to challenge the beliefs of another, you must expect that you will be asked to validate your claims.

The article I presented was not as a challenge to anyone, it just explained the Islamic view(I apologise if it seemed like a challenge).
And the question I originally asked has been answered.

Sorry, but I am not going to get into this discussion as I already told you.

Such a discussion will get you and I nowhere,because I believe I am on the truth and you believe otherwise.

I am not going to take the risk of getting into a discussion where I might unknowingly say some of the truths/words of the Almighty in the Bible/s is not the truth,because I am not sure which are from the original revelation revealed to Jesus(alaihi salaam) and which were added later.

I hope you do find someone knowledgeable enough on both the Gospels and the Quran to present you with the discussion you wish to have.:)

The article I presented was not as a challenge to anyone, it just explained the Islamic view(I apologise if it seemed like a challenge).
And the question I originally asked has been answered.

I do not know how you could have said it was not a challenge. It was attacking the essentials of the Christian faith. All I did was quote the Koran.


Such a discussion will get you and I nowhere,because I believe I am on the truth and you believe otherwise.

I fully accept your right to believe as you wish, and truts that you accept my right to believe as I wish. The question that I have is why we cannot discuss our respect beliefs?


I am not going to take the risk of getting into a discussion where I might unknowingly say some of the truths/words of the Almighty in the Bible/s is not the truth,because I am not sure which are from the original revelation revealed to Jesus(alaihi salaam) and which were added later.

Then why don't we look at the evidence that there is from the ancient texts which demonstrate the accuracy of the whole Bible? That way you do not have to worry.

Well just a quick question.

Where in the Bible does Jesus claim to be God?

This is the largest difference between the Islam and Christianity.

....Then why don't we look at the evidence that there is from the ancient texts which demonstrate the accuracy of the whole Bible? That way you do not have to worry.

I am not worried, because I am already on the right path!

I am not worried, because I am already on the right path!

How do you know? You have no proof - it is blind faith.

Well just a quick question.

Where in the Bible does Jesus claim to be God?

This is the largest difference between the Islam and Christianity.

The differences between Christianity and Islam are huge. This is only one of the major differences.

Also, Why limit it to where Jesus Himself says that He is God. Why not expand it to the whole Bible, because examples of scriptures testifying to that reality are found throughout the Bible (OT and NT). But to answer your specific question, we have a few examples where Jesus acknowledges or states that He is God. Here are a couple:

Rev 1:8
8 I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End," says the Lord, "who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty."
NKJV

Rev 22:13-17
13 I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End, the First and the Last." 14 Blessed are those who do His commandments, that they may have the right to the tree of life, and may enter through the gates into the city. 15 But outside are dogs and sorcerers and sexually immoral and murderers and idolaters, and whoever loves and practices a lie. 16 I, Jesus, have sent My angel to testify to you these things in the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, the Bright and Morning Star."
NKJV

The Alpha and Omega are identified elsewhere in scripture, such as Rev 1:8 quoted above. Note also that the reference above to the "First and the Last" is a reference to God. See this passage from the OT which indicates that to be the case:

Isa 44:6
6 "Thus says the LORD, the King of Israel,
And his Redeemer, the LORD of hosts:
'I am the First and I am the Last;
Besides Me there is no God.
NKJV

Note also in Is 44:6, that God calls Himself the Redeemer, another term for Jesus.

John 8:58-59
58 Jesus said to them, "Most assuredly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM." 59 Then they took up stones to throw at Him; but Jesus hid Himself and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by.
NKJV

In this passage, Jesus not only claims the attribute of God of being outside of time, but also calls Himself "I AM", which is a title of God. The Jews recognized what he was saying and considered it blasphemy to call Himself God and took up stones as a result.

John 20:28-29
28 And Thomas answered and said to Him, "My Lord and my God!" 29 Jesus said to him, "Thomas, because you have seen Me, you have believed. Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed."
NKJV

Note that Jesus acknowledges that what Thomas is saying about Jesus being God is true. We could also look at a multitude of other verses which clearly identify Jesus as God, for example:

John 1
1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
NKJV

And

Isa 9:6
6 For unto us a Child is born,
Unto us a Son is given;
And the government will be upon His shoulder.
And His name will be called
Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God,
NKJV

And there are many more references that I could give, but for the sake of brevity, I will stop here.

As I have not read the Bible nor done a comparative study,I wonder what the Bible says about Muhammad.

I believe that the original Armeniac(hope that is the right spelling) Bible will have some mention of our Prophet (pbuh)
I was wondering about the Bibles available today.

I have read different articles regarding this and I found that it seems that there is a verse in Isaiah about a book being revealed to an unlettered person and is asked to read when it is replied that he is not learned.

This seems to match with the description of Muhammad(pbuh) because he was unlettered and he was asked to recite,but replies that he is unlettered.

Could someone give reference for this, or am I wrong.

Thank you.

The Bible has no mention of Muhammad, it does not say there is another prophet to come after the Missiah. Jesus Christ is the Missiah and after him we have no need of another prophet
Perhaps you would be wise to heed these words in Isaiah
1:15 When you spread out your hands in prayer,
I will hide my eyes from you;
Even if you offer many prayers,
I will not listen.
Your hands are full of blood;

16 wash and make yourselves clean.
Take your evil deeds
Out of my sight!
Stop doing wrong,

This site would agree with you that Muhammad was mentioned in the Old Testament -
Old-Testament describes Him (http://www.islambyquestions.net/Prophet/Testament.htm)

This site would not agree - Are There Predictions of Muhammad in the Old Testament? (http://debate.org.uk/topics/trtracts/t05.htm)

For myself, that was never in any of my religious upbringing, no matter which denomination I belonged to. I do not mean to offend you in any way, but I cannot see it.

That site you recommend the quotations speak of Jesus

No there is no mention of Muhammand in the bible, you may make a vague reference in the warning of false prophets to come but that would be as close as I would go.

Since this is in Christianity, I will give a direct opinion, it is obvious since the quran contains large parts of the Christian teachings, ( that he would have learned from his slaves and christian wife, but the thing is, that area had some incorrect christain teachings that was unique to that area, and they were develped into the quran.

So basically it is obvious to those who studied the quran from a christian view point that parts were taken from Christian teachings that Muhammad would had copied from their teachings

teachings that Muhammad would had copied from thier teachings
As this is just your opinion, here is the muslim answer to that(not as a challenge but to correct a misconception.

EDIT::::As the answer I presented on this forum seems to be offending on a Christian board, I have moved it to Islam board and here is a link for any who wish to read.

https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/other-religion/islam-viewed-others-121497-8.html#post636757

I don't waste my time reading cut and paste, I guess I could do the same, but it is more than my opinoin, it is what is taught and many books written about it.

On the Isam board I will always show respect but on the Christianity board I wish christians to know the truth about how incorrect christian and other teachings were used by a man to control a population, and latter developed up into a religious following. I could easily come to the Islam board and cut and paste all the teachings of how it is false, following the sun god and not even related property to the original God of the old testement, but I don't because that is a board to discuss your faith, This is the christian board and the teachings of it will be presented to show the false teachings of Islam.

The differences between Christianity and Islam are huge. This is only one of the major differences.

Also, Why limit it to where Jesus Himself says that He is God. Why not expand it to the whole Bible, because examples of scriptures testifying to that reality are found throughout the Bible (OT and NT). But to answer your specific question, we have a few examples where Jesus acknowledges or states that He is God. Here are a couple:

Rev 1:8
8 I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End," says the Lord, "who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty."
NKJV

Rev 22:13-17
13 I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End, the First and the Last." 14 Blessed are those who do His commandments, that they may have the right to the tree of life, and may enter through the gates into the city. 15 But outside are dogs and sorcerers and sexually immoral and murderers and idolaters, and whoever loves and practices a lie. 16 I, Jesus, have sent My angel to testify to you these things in the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, the Bright and Morning Star."
NKJV

The Alpha and Omega are identified elsewhere in scripture, such as Rev 1:8 quoted above. Note also that the reference above to the "First and the Last" is a reference to God. See this passage from the OT which indicates that to be the case:

Isa 44:6
6 "Thus says the LORD, the King of Israel,
And his Redeemer, the LORD of hosts:
'I am the First and I am the Last;
Besides Me there is no God.
NKJV

Note also in Is 44:6, that God calls Himself the Redeemer, another term for Jesus.

John 8:58-59
58 Jesus said to them, "Most assuredly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM." 59 Then they took up stones to throw at Him; but Jesus hid Himself and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by.
NKJV

In this passage, Jesus not only claims the attribute of God of being outside of time, but also calls Himself "I AM", which is a title of God. The Jews recognized what he was saying and considered it blasphemy to call Himself God and took up stones as a result.

John 20:28-29
28 And Thomas answered and said to Him, "My Lord and my God!" 29 Jesus said to him, "Thomas, because you have seen Me, you have believed. Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed."
NKJV

Note that Jesus acknowledges that what Thomas is saying about Jesus being God is true. We could also look at a multitude of other verses which clearly identify Jesus as God, for example:

John 1
1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
NKJV

and

Isa 9:6
6 For unto us a Child is born,
Unto us a Son is given;
And the government will be upon His shoulder.
And His name will be called
Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God,
NKJV

And there are many more references that I could give, but for the sake of brevity, I will stop here.
Was the writer of Revelation a prophet?
The reason for this was Jesus was in heaven and the source in the book was an angel.
I thought that Jesus was the last prophet according to Christians (or as you say he is God in the flesh) so could this be a false prophet?

Was the writer of Revelation a prophet?
The reason for this was Jesus was in heaven and the source in the book was an angel.
I thought that Jesus was the last prophet according to Christians (or as you say he is God in the flesh) so could this be a false prophet?

First, what about the angel:

Rev 1:1
And He sent and signified it by His angel to His servant John,
NKJV

He sent and signified it by His angel. So the angel was a messenger who brought a sign of the message. But was the angel the speaker? Let's see who is speaking:

Rev 1:4-8
4 John, to the seven churches which are in Asia:

Grace to you and peace from Him who is and who was and who is to come, and from the seven Spirits who are before His throne, 5 and from Jesus Christ, the faithful witness, the firstborn from the dead, and the ruler over the kings of the earth. To Him who loved us and washed us from our sins in His own blood, 6 and has made us kings and priests to His God and Father, to Him be glory and dominion forever and ever. Amen. 7 Behold, He is coming with clouds, and every eye will see Him, even they who pierced Him. And all the tribes of the earth will mourn because of Him. Even so, Amen. 8 I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End," says the Lord, "who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty."
NKJV

Here we have two speakers, John and Jesus, and as of yet, the angel has been silent.

Rev 1:9-10
9 I, John, both your brother and companion in the tribulation and kingdom and patience of Jesus Christ, was on the island that is called Patmos for the word of God and for the testimony of Jesus Christ.
NKJV

John speaks again. And then John described the other speaker:

Rev 1:10-15
10 I was in the Spirit on the Lord's Day, and I heard behind me a loud voice, as of a trumpet, 11 saying, "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last," and, "What you see, write in a book and send it to the seven churches which are in Asia: to Ephesus, to Smyrna, to Pergamos, to Thyatira, to Sardis, to Philadelphia, and to Laodicea." 12 Then I turned to see the voice that spoke with me. And having turned I saw seven golden lampstands, 13 and in the midst of the seven lampstands One like the Son of Man, clothed with a garment down to the feet and girded about the chest with a golden band. 14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and His eyes like a flame of fire;
NKJV

The other speaker, John actually sees and it is Jesus, and Jesus continues to speak throughout chapters 2 and 3. I could go on further, but your assumption about the speakers is wrong. Exactly what the role was of the angel in sending and signifying is not stated.

So you question regarding John being a false prophet - the answer is no. There is nothing here that would suggest that.

Jesus is in fact God manifest in the flesh (John 1:1, 1 Tim 3:16 and many others).

John 1:1-4
1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made.
NKJV

John 1:14-15
14 And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth.
NKJV

1 Tim 3:15-16
16 And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness:
God was manifested in the flesh,
Justified in the Spirit,
Seen by angels,
Preached among the Gentiles,
Believed on in the world,
Received up in glory.
NKJV

Ahhhhh was wondering about that.

The points Firmbeliever brings up do need checking on as I know from my studies that Jews and Christians in Mecca and Medina followed Muhammad.

It was not until after the death of Muhammad that the 3 religions started having problems with one another and yes some of them where caused by followers of Islam while others were caused by followers of Christianity. From the records I have been able to uncover the Jews left on their own accord with no animosity at that time.

This is what sometimes has me confused why the early followers of Muhammad included people of all faiths that started with Abraham.

Stay in peace

I guess Muhammad did not have much trouble, since they were either killed or made slaves as he captured their areas though military force and asked them to convert to his religion or die.

So I guess he would not believe he had any trouble.

I will agree with paraclete, one comes to the Christian board and posts teachings of a false prophet to Christianity and then complains when people tell the truth of that religion. The poster shows no respect to Christianity by posting their false beleifs on the Christian board.

I apologise to those who feel offended.
I asked a question and got the answer, it was not me who wished to argue or to convert people or to prove I am right.

I asked for informations sake and if you think that is wrong I am sorry,but I did get new information because I asked.

And me as a muslim asking on a Chrisitan thread is offensive I am not sure where I can ask about Chrisitianity.
About posting about a "false Prophet", if I did post one, it would be in answer to a post/question in this thread.
As non-believers of any faith can ask on any religious boards I do not really see anything wrong in asking a question.

Good point

I apologise to those who feel offended.
I asked a question and got the answer, it was not me who wished to argue or to convert people or to prove I am right.

I asked for informations sake and if you think that is wrong I am sorry,but I did get new information because I asked.

And me as a muslim asking on a Chrisitan thread is offensive I am not sure where I can ask about Chrisitianity.
About posting about a "false Prophet", if I did post one, it would be in answer to a post/question in this thread.
As non-believers of any faith can ask on any religious boards I do not really see anything wrong in asking a question.

I don't see anything wrong with asking a question either.

Where I think that the problem here is, is that you came on the Christianity board, asked questions and then when you received responses, you said that you did not want to discuss, and essentially told us that we were wrong and that you were right even though you did not have any proof and knew neither the Bible or the Koran well enough to discuss it, and further told us that our Bible was corrupt, even though you had no proof of that either.

Jibraeel(AS) once came to prophet(SAW) n said Allah has given me the knowledge to count every leaf on earth,every fish in the sea,every star in the sky and every partical of sand on earth,but there's one thing I can't count.
Prophet (SAW)asked jibraeel(AS) whatis it?
Jibraeel(AS) replied.. "when one of your ummah recites durood or salam to U,the blessings Allah showers upon him bcomes impossible for me to count!


By this hadith you can clearly understand even Jibraeel(AS) cannot count the blessing upon the prophet(pbuh)... so please study the life of the prophet(pbuh) and his companions... inshallah you will get all the answers.

Jibraeel(AS) once came to prophet(SAW) n said Allah has given me the knowledge to count every leaf on earth,every fish in the sea,every star in the sky n every partical of sand on earth,but there's one thing i can't count.
prophet (SAW)asked jibraeel(AS) whatis it??
Jibraeel(AS) replied.. "when one of ur ummah recites durood or salam to U,the blessings Allah showers upon him bcomes impossible for me to count!!


by this hadith u can clearly understand even Jibraeel(AS) cannot count the blessing upon the prophet(pbuh).........so please study the life of the prophet(pbuh) and his companions....inshallah u will get all the answers.

The Koran says to go to the injeel (The Christian Gospel). Have you?

I stand by my original statement Muhummud is not directly mentioned in the Bible. There are references to false prophets and false Christs with the obvious warning not to be misled.

I am not a student of the quoran, since, when you know the truth you have no need to study other teachings, and as a Christian I have no wish to debate those other writings. What I know is this, many have been misled in both Christianity and Islam over the centuries into thinking that killing unbelievers is the way to please God. How can God be pleased by such attitudes? God (Yehweh) wants everyone to know the truth, that through the death of his son, Jesus Christ, God in human form, he has provided a way for all mankind to spend eternity basking in his glory. He doesn't ask us to earn this privilege with our works but to accept his way and his gift in humility. Jesus Christ marked a turning point in history and in our relationship with God.

The message of the Gospel of Jesus Christ is simple, believe and receive, but it is unmistakable, no one comes to the father, (Yehweh) but through me (Jesus Christ). One needs the guidance of the Holy Spirit to truly see and this is freely provided.

If you have further questions I will gladly explain what I know but what knowledge I have of Muhummud shows a person who was confused about the source of the messages he received. God is not a God of confusion.

Bobby,
Thanks for the link to the site about Muhammad's False Prophecies
Very interesting.
Peace and kindness,
Fred

Firm,

There is Nothing in the Word of God (Bible)concerning Muhammad personally. I agree with Fr Chuck and Paraclete.

Is the Christian New Testament used by Jews too?

I have not read the Bible, but I do read different articles written by different people regarding the monotheistic faiths.


Do bear with my ignorance on Jewish scriptures and Christian Scriptures.

Firm,

The Lord Jesus is most defenitely in the Old testament as well as the New. He isn't revealed as the Lord Jesus until the new testament. Once you understand WHO he was, you will find him all through the Old testament. He is the one that was in the fiery furnnace with the three Hebrew boys, He is the one that wrestled with Jacob... and so on. So you are correct he is in the Word from Genesis all the way to Revelation! It is ALL about him.

classyT
I agree that there is nothing in the bible about Muhammad.
Fred

Dear Firm Believer..
I really don't know how long this Question been or even if you will read it..
Any way, I like to let you know that in the Christine community, there is a welcome for any question any one have.. And I like you to know that some of us even study the Islam and know the Qura'an too.. I myself do.. And to answer your question.. I can't say yes, but I will give you as close as I can to an answer..
If you like to read the Bible, which I advice every one to read, you will find some information about the last prophet as a great prophet will be coming, also he been called the greater than John the Baptist himself, and you know that Jesus was the cousin of John, where John's father is Zakaria"The prophet" and the Holy Mother Mary, was brought up in the very same house.. Even in the Torah and the Haftarot, it did talk about the prophet.
You may read Luke, and in mark, and Daniel too, but I will advice you to read the Aramaic copy.. Let's just say, it have more information for what the other new King James and others have.. Not saying they are wrong, NO,, I just know what are you looking for and I think if you want to learn, you may want to read out there first..
The most problem we having over the way people trying to explain things is the same issue that you Muslims are having when you teach the Qra'an, Every one is trying to explain what he or she understood.. That is one way to say it...
But I can't say that it is Mohammed the son of Abdulah of Makah.. I really can't tell you that.. You need first to understand why Christianity is like what it is today.. The way Christians see things is a little different than the way you Muslims see it... Because the Christians believe in the death of Jesus on the Cross, where you don't, Also the mater of the Trinity, you don't see it or understand it the we Christens do.. Even thou, It's very smeller story the one you teach, and even thou you believe in Jesus as the Savior to our world, and even thou you know and teach that He is coming back to free us and fight the final boatel.. But some differences make the Christianity don't agree with the way Muslims see things..
But my friend, I want you to know that for the most of us, and I mean for the ones whom do the Lord's work, and the some that did read the Islamic teachings.. We respect and always welcome any question you may have...
I learnt quite a little about your faith, and I thing it's very close to mine and to many people that study the Bible and understand it.. So please, don't make a wrong ideas to miss lead you.. We would love to talk to you and answer your questions..

Why your answer is directed to me I cannot say. The prophet who was to come who was greater than John the Baptist is Jesus we have no need of other prophets even though there have been many and quite an number of them false, such as Muhhamud who led his followers into battle, quite the antithesis of the way Jesus proposed. Tell me, are we expected to think God is confused, on the one hand teaching peace and salvation on the other death and destruction. The Muslims have been misled by a false prophet, there can be no doubt

Dear Sir/Ma'am...
Thank you for your replay, But I like to add...
I answered a question..
And I will ask you if you ever seen the Bernaba Bible? Or have you ever seen or read the Bible in Aramaic... If you did, I think you will have the answers you my not like... If I answered any question I answer 'em from what I have studied and seen, and I'm sure you don't say I'm misleading any one, and I like to point to you, that you claimed that Jesus Christ is a profit, I think you more less have the Muslim's ideas about that part..
Jesus in our believe is not a prophet, unless you see it that way, and my quote was not directed to you...
I will ask you to read before you answer.. I done my homework.. I really don't take any one asking me if I believe that God is confused, and by the way, In the country where I live, Christians and Muslims live together and have respect and understanding to each others.. I will never say a bad word about them, as long as they don't show any bad doing toured us... I don't know where you from, But I've been around and lived in many places including the US.. And I saw the way people think and they talk about others,,
I like you to know that if Mohammed was or was not what the Muslim claim him to be.. He is a very respectful person out here.. And if you like to know more, The Muslims will never say any bad about Christianity or the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.. I know for sure that the Muslims do believe in him in a different way than we do, and they have all love for our kind... May be we need to stop listening to all that poison that some try to make us believe...
I will stand and respond for my believes and what I learned... If some information is not in the version of the book ( Bible ) you have.. I will ask you to find other versions and read maybe then we all can live in peace and stop calling each other names that no need to call... If like to believe what you do already do.. I wish you the best luck.. You are a senior member here and I'm not.. But I will stand for what I believe like you will..
Peace..
Sam

why your answer is directed to me I cannot say. The prophet who was to come who was greater than John the Baptist is Jesus we have no need of other prophets even though there have been many and quite an number of them false,, such as Muhhamud who led his followers into battle, quite the antithesis of the way Jesus proposed. Tell me, are we expected to think God is confused, on the one hand teaching peace and salvation on the other death and destruction. The Muslims have been misled by a false prophet, there can be no doubt

One more add to my statement..
I never claimed that Mohammed is a prophet, nor I did say he is in the Bible..
Please don't put words in my mouth.

Sam
Jesus was a prophet, this does not invalidate the teaching and the fact that he was also much more, Messiah, Saviour, Lord, glorified by the Father. But Jesus was also an eternal being long before he manifested in the flesh, The Lamb of God slain before the beginning of the world. To relegate him to the standing of being a prophet only and a lesser prophet to a desert mad man is to completely disrespect everything Christianity stands for. Don't tell me Muslims respect you, they tolerate you. I have been in places where Muslims dominate so I understand that on a day to day basis there can be peace between religions even in an Islamic country, this doesn't mean they don't see you as second class. Muhhamud did not die for his followers therefore on that ground alone he cannot claim to be greater than Jesus.

Sam
Jesus was a prophet, this does not invalidate the teaching and the fact that he was also much more, Messiah, Saviour, Lord, glorified by the Father. But Jesus was also an eternal being long before he manifested in the flesh, The Lamb of God slain before the beginning of the world. To relegate him to the standing of being a prophet only and a lesser prophet to a desert mad man is to completely disrespect everything Christianity stands for. Don't tell me Muslims respect you, they tolerate you. I have been in places where Muslims dominate so I understand that on a day to day basis there can be peace between religions even in an Islamic country, this doesn't mean they don't see you as second class. Muhhamud did not die for his followers therefore on that ground alone he cannot claim to be greater than Jesus.

WOW! Excellent post... politically incorrect of course but truth is always truth even if it isn't a popular thought. :)

paraclete,
Glad to see you here.
Peace and kindness,
Fred (arcura)