autoserv
Sep 9, 2007, 08:47 AM
Americans unwittingly cooperated
With the terrorists in achieving a major goal: spreading fear and thus
Disrupting lives. In other words, we could have reacted more rationally and as
A result produced less disruption in the lives of our citizens. What is the premise and conclusion of this argument. Do the premises sufficiently support the conclusions?
o Are the arguments either deductively valid or inductively strong, or are they invalid or weak?
o Are the premises true or plausibly true, or are they difficult to prove?
With the terrorists in achieving a major goal: spreading fear and thus
Disrupting lives. In other words, we could have reacted more rationally and as
A result produced less disruption in the lives of our citizens. What is the premise and conclusion of this argument. Do the premises sufficiently support the conclusions?
o Are the arguments either deductively valid or inductively strong, or are they invalid or weak?
o Are the premises true or plausibly true, or are they difficult to prove?