RickJ
Aug 2, 2007, 07:49 AM
This week I've been chatting with a member about the etymology of entomology, the use of apostrophes and other fun stuff... and coincidentally just yesterday the editor of Webster's was on Talk of the Nation. They were discussing a variety of things that made me realize that "proper" English is often just an opinion.
It's all been such great fun I'm going to quit my job and look on monster.com for a high paying etymologist position to apply for :)
Snuck: While admitting that other dictionaries have it, Webster insists is NOT a word and it will not be in the next edition... but he did admit that if it becomes popular/more accepted, it would be included with a note such as "formerly not acceptable" or otherwise noted as new. The odd sounding "sneaked" is proper according to him.
Moisten, Often, Wrestle... all should be silent T.
Cleave/Cleave: There is no special term for words that can have opposite meanings.
Irregardless: Use of this word has always irritated me... and the guy made me feel better to affirm that it is not acceptable because it is basically a double negative.
Anyone know of any good sites that expose/explain stuff like this?
It's all been such great fun I'm going to quit my job and look on monster.com for a high paying etymologist position to apply for :)
Snuck: While admitting that other dictionaries have it, Webster insists is NOT a word and it will not be in the next edition... but he did admit that if it becomes popular/more accepted, it would be included with a note such as "formerly not acceptable" or otherwise noted as new. The odd sounding "sneaked" is proper according to him.
Moisten, Often, Wrestle... all should be silent T.
Cleave/Cleave: There is no special term for words that can have opposite meanings.
Irregardless: Use of this word has always irritated me... and the guy made me feel better to affirm that it is not acceptable because it is basically a double negative.
Anyone know of any good sites that expose/explain stuff like this?