a bit of editorial exagerationIs that what it's called now? I would call it something else. And isn't it funny how it's actually all my fault? That really made me laugh.


I mean he got away with the hydroxy deathsYour TDS desperately needs treatment.

As to the rest of your post, you first posted a complete lie and then you got called on it, so now you want to run someone else down. Good luck with that. Next time try posting the truth.

But JL, his suggestion for a cure was crazy as hell, and you found it viable, or not radical? That's as far from the truth as anything I posted, so maybe you should consider getting some UV rays yourself...safely with a brisk walk outside in the sun. Do you some good. You could also consider the parallels in our previous response to the 1917 pandemic to what we see today. Eye opening right down to the flat earther protests of the shutdowns, and reopening the economy to soon with disastrous results.

PS

Your TDS is but the opposite of the spectrum as mine so when YOU get treated, so will I, which I admit can only be treated when the dufus leaves office. Then we can disinfect the WH. That's the only known cure.

Tal, Trump is just an opportinist and should not be listened to, you and I agree on that, but this will be over either way before he leaves office. he is in panic mode, he desperately needs both a cure and a stable economy

But JL, his suggestion for a cure was crazy as hell, and you found it viable, or not radical? That's as far from the truth as anything I posted, so maybe you should consider getting some UV rays yourself..And you are still, shall we say, inflating the truth. I never said I found his statement to be viable. I did say that your statement was flatly untrue, just like the one here is. If you want to be Mr. Judge and Jury about Trump lying, then maybe you should be a lot more careful with the truth yourself. That is the third statement made about Trump by libs on this board in the past two or three days that were just absolutely untrue. When you call Trump a liar, just consider how that might apply to those statements.

And you are still, shall we say, inflating the truth. I never said I found his statement to be viable. I did say that your statement was flatly untrue, just like the one here is. If you want to be Mr. Judge and Jury about Trump lying, then maybe you should be a lot more careful with the truth yourself. That is the third statement made about Trump by libs on this board in the past two or three days that were just absolutely untrue. When you call Trump a liar, just consider how that might apply to those statements.

You think I miss how you exclude qualifiers in your quote of others? No wonder you miss nuances because you omit them.



his suggestion for a cure was crazy as hell, and you found it viable, or not radical?


Expression of opinions of the dufus may well be judgmental, and HARSH, but he is a loose lipped lying dufus and that's just a fact you need to accept, and while you can agree or not, I have every much a right to express my opinion as you do and it would help if you quote people in entirety before you blast them as untruthful.

You think I miss how you exclude qualifiers in your quote of others? No wonder you miss nuances because you omit them.All this talk of "qualifiers" and "nuances" is just a smokescreen. You posted false information and that's all there is to it.


he is a loose lipped lying dufusLike the people on this board who have posted fake quotes from him the past two days? Like them?


I have every much a right to express my opinion as you do and it would help if you quote people in entirety before you blast them as untruthful.I support your right to express your opinion. I also support my right to point out when you are being dishonest. If I misquote someone, then point it out and we can deal with it. Otherwise, your generalized accusations are just there to make you feel a little better about yourself.

It's sad and sick that you liberals so desperately want that drug to not work just so you can increase your criticism of Trump.
Liberals and sane people who do not hang on his every word agree Trump has no business talking about anything medical or suggested treatments and cures. That's why he has medical experts on stage with him.

the jury is out on the drug .some non-peer reviewed studies say there is a benefit . Other non-peer reviewed studies say something else. All we have is anecdotal evidence one way or the other . But as I said . Novartis is going to do an extensive FDA approved study that should give answers

While we are on the subject of the drug :
The narrative goes that Rick Bright ,an official at HHS was going to be fired because he opposed the promotion of the drug.
That is a FALSE narrative . In truth ,he was one of the early promoters of the Drug. He sent out a letter March 28 to the FDA seeking Emergency Use Authorization for hydroxychloroquine.

https://www.fda.gov/media/136534/download?fbclid=IwAR3YymEPHkDtJixyRlGyoB0QeW34p2Fk bLUY7iysHq68ULxxrBxp8rFMOX4

The truth is that he was just a contentious individual who frequently clashed with others in the agency. When he found out that he was going to get canned he decide to become the next heroic whistle blower .

He has now hired Debra Katz and Lisa Banks, who represented Christine Blasey Ford . It is going to be Kavanaugh 2.0

All this talk of "qualifiers" and "nuances" is just a smokescreen. You posted false information and that's all there is to it.

No I didn't, go back and review the tapes of his pressers and learn to quote complete sentences, and get off the semantical dancing. That would help the communications or ASK did you mean...! Then we don't have to deal with DISHONESTY, or false information. Trust but verify dude.


Like the people on this board who have posted fake quotes from him the past two days? Like them?

Like the one I showed that you omitted the qualifier OR from!


I support your right to express your opinion. I also support my right to point out when you are being dishonest. If I misquote someone, then point it out and we can deal with it. Otherwise, your generalized accusations are just there to make you feel a little better about yourself.

Point all you want but PROVE me wrong before you jump to your own conclusions.

I thought it hilarious when he tried to prompt the experts to agree with him and they stuck to his guns. I'm also aware that Dr. Bright was in on approval for hydroxyC for emergency use only as the letter states, for CV19, and even that states no treatments or cures and maybe it was worth a shot given we had NOTHING.

from CNN politics page :



Countering Bright's allegations of political retaliation, five current and former administration officials are now also leveling a range of allegations against Bright, including: accusing him of poorly managing his office, mistreating staff and failing to consult his superiors on consequential decisions. Four current and former administration officials say Bright's removal had been a long time coming and preceded any
disagreements over the use of hydroxychloroquine (http://www.cnn.com/2020/04/23/politics/donald-trump-science-coronavirus/index.html)
.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/23/politics/rick-bright-health-and-human-services-coronavirus/index.html

But Bright's most recent performance review from May 2019, a copy of which was obtained by CNN, offers the most direct rebuttal to the allegations, delivering rave reviews for Bright's management of his office and includes no criticisms. Bob Kadlec, who carried out the review, doled out top marks for Bright's performance, calling his tenure "very successful" and giving him a weighted score of 480 out of 500.

He has a right to a fair evaluation by the proper authority, which would be a dufus acting IG. Interesting indeed how this will shake out.

No I didn't, go back and review the tapes of his pressers and learn to quote complete sentences, and get off the semantical dancing. That would help the communications or ASK did you mean...! Then we don't have to deal with DISHONESTY, or false information. Trust but verify dude.Meaningless diatribe.


Like the one I showed that you omitted the qualifier OR from!Where?


Point all you want but PROVE me wrong before you jump to your own conclusions.Well, I've already done that once. How many more times do I need to?

1. Or grand lack of understanding?

2. Way back in post#255

3.You said I was wrong, which is par for the course with you, probably personality flaw. No biggie, I have plenty of those myself, but you prove nothing with your opinion/position/peeve/or flaws.

what we will be treated to is another kangaroo court .Madame Mim and
Rep. Anna Eshoo, chairwoman of the House’s health subcommittee, plan on holding a hearing to probe the allegation . They already said they want Bright as their star witness.

This is Madame Mim demonstrating how to properly wear a mask

https://kfoxtv.com/resources/media/6f904a61-1a15-4c40-a8ae-ed0436f43bf0-medium16x9_AP20115600196154.jpg?1587758948379 (https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fkfoxtv.com%2Fnews%2Fcoronavirus% 2Fpelosi-no-more-virus-bailouts-without-state-and-local-aid&psig=AOvVaw2zRPtH_j7jYsBIl1R-n_ud&ust=1587853856665000&source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CAIQjRxqFwoTCPjiituOgukCFQAAAAAdAAAAABAI)


This is her when she is trying to put on a show as in walking down the aisle with the cameras rolling . She wears gloves too. https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/04/23/22/27569738-8249551-New_era_Nancy_Pelosi_her_aides_and_security_detail _all_covered_t-a-72_1587676460654.jpg (https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailymail.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fart icle-8249551%2FWear-face-masks-stay-elevators-safety-measures-House-votes-bailout-package.html&psig=AOvVaw2zRPtH_j7jYsBIl1R-n_ud&ust=1587853856665000&source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CAIQjRxqFwoTCPjiituOgukCFQAAAAAdAAAAABAO)

I'll see your Pelosi, and call your dufus.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EUujpDvXYAE1vSJ?format=jpg&name=medium (https://twitter.com/NYDailyNews/status/1246272860974395393/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwte rm%5E1246272860974395393&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.huffpost.com%2Fentry%2Fn ew-york-daily-news-trump-coronavirus-masks_n_5e882496c5b6e7d76c642d4e)

Tal, that one should get the Grand Prize.

The dufus is a treasure trove of cartoons, and jokes.