Log in

View Full Version : Unlawful change in land ownership


purshotam
May 26, 2013, 01:03 AM
Unlawful change in land ownership
Rajvi Amar Singh s/o Bahadur Singh resident of Bikaner was holding Araji 188 bigha 16 biswa land of Khasra No. 102 in chak Momewala ,tehsil Anupgarh distt. Ganganagar .He sold his land 53 bigha 10 biswa of above mentioned Khasra No. 102 to Bharpai Devi d/o Dayee Ram caste Khati r/o Hanumangarh through his special power of attorney Padma Ram by executing a registered sale deed on 20.11.1959 in the office of Sub Registrar Anupgarh(here in called Annexure-1) and also sold his land 63 bigha 10 biswa of same khasra no. 102 chak Momewala to Harish Chander s/o Sukhram Das caste Saini r/o Hanumangarh through his special power of attorney Padma Ram by executing a registered sale deed on 20.11.1959 in the office of Sub Registrar Anupgarh (here in called Annexure-2)
Bharpai Devi herself further sold her land by executing a registered sale deed of 53 bigha 10 biswa of Khasra No. 102 chak Momewala in favour of Basant Singh s/o Sardara Singh caste jat sikh r/o village Narayangarh tehsil Hanumangarh and Satpal Singh s/o Laxmana nand Singh caste Thakur r/o village Morjand Khari tehsil Hanumangarh , both having equal share of land in the office of Sub Registrar Anupgarh on dated 26.12.1959 (here in called Annexure-3).
Harish Chander s/o Sukhram Das sold his land by executing a registered sale deed of 25 bigha land comprising of Khasra No. 102 Chak Momewala through his special power of attorney Bhimraj s/o Daya Ram caste Jangar r/o Anupgarh in favour of Darshana jit Kaur d/o Hardyal Singh jat sra r/o Morjand Khari tehsil Hanumangarh on dated 04.03.1960 (here in called Annexure-4) and also sold his land by executing a registered sale deed of 25 bigha land comprising of Khasra no 102 chak Momewala through his special power of attorney Bhimraj s/o Daya Ram caste Jangar r/o Anupgarh in favour of Vinaypal Singh s/o Laxnana nand Singh caste Thakur r/o village Morjand Khari tehsil Hanumangarh tehsil Hanumangarh on dated 04.03.1960 (here in called Annexure-5)
Above mentioned Khasra No. 102 Chak Momewala according to Soochi No. 4 (here in called Annexure-6) is now planned to chak 4 MD, chak 6 MD,23 AS.
During above mentioned registered sale deeds Rajvi Amar Singh transferred all of his Khatedari rights to the purchasers of the land .He also declared in his Ikrarnama (here in called Annexure-7) that he and his sons did not have any right or claim on this sold land in future .
To a great surprise the Khatedari of above land which was sold by Rajvi Amar Singh has been mutated in the names of his wife Jaswant Kanwar and his sons Rajinedr singh,Surinder Singh & Narpat Singh which is unlawful change in land ownership .Rajvi Amar Singh’s family has no right /claim over the land which he had already sold through registered sale deeds. All original record kept safe and may be shown during need.
In lieu of the above facts the unlawful Khatedari of Jaswant Kanwar ,Narpat Singh,Rajinder Singh,Surinder singh be dismissed and the purchasers of the above land should get Khatedari Rights .Kindly Justice may be done

joypulv
May 26, 2013, 02:38 AM
I'm not sure anyone on this site is familiar with Indian real estate law. I don't understand Khatedari Rights, or many of the other terms used here. You have a deed in your name, but the owners from 1959 somehow put the same land into other family's names? Showing us the papers you have won't help. You need a local attorney to help you in court.

AK lawyer
May 27, 2013, 06:10 AM
It looks as though OP has copied some or all of a court pleading (complaint, petition, answer, or whatever it would be called in India) into the post. I don't see a question there.

Also, some important details are missing:
For example:

"... During above mentioned registered sale deeds Rajvi Amar Singh transferred ...". During what? Did the transfer take place before or after the other transfers were registered?


"... In lieu of the above facts the unlawful Khatedari of Jaswant Kanwar ,Narpat Singh,Rajinder Singh,Surinder singh be dismissed and ...": Who is asking that what be dismissed?