Log in

View Full Version : Ahmamadjihad is at it again


paraclete
Sep 18, 2009, 03:16 PM
Holocaust a myth, Israel no future: Ahmadinejad | World News | News.com.au (http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,26095422-401,00.html)

So immediately after Obama pulls the plug on missile defense in central Europe Ahamadjihad tweeks his nose. This is classic brinkmanship, but it is also sad because inevitably only one state can exist in the middle east, Iran or Israel; it seems the place just isn't big enough for both. Why doesn't someone offer this idiot a trip to Germany and Poland to do his study?

tomder55
Sep 19, 2009, 02:46 AM
I have a better idea .Send him and his kindred of Cain on a one way virgin seeking field trip .
The bigger outrage is that this shiite head will be in NY this week for the General Assembly meeting . We should deny the Mahdi-hatter a visa... and if the UN squawks about it tell their scoff-law diplomats adios . Let them set up HQ in Mogadishu.

paraclete
Sep 19, 2009, 04:00 AM
Ah Tom you are big on human rights but denying him access to the UN would just prove the US is biased. If you want to bias debate NY should never have been chosen. So Here we are with ahmamadjihad loose in NY an no one able to stop him preaching hatred. So much for a free society

tomder55
Sep 19, 2009, 04:05 AM
I don't think any criminal should be invited here and I have no problem with the UN finding other residency.

paraclete
Sep 19, 2009, 04:11 AM
Yes Kereglean Island would be appropriate

zippit
Sep 19, 2009, 04:44 AM
The article says his tirade shames his country the proublem is this poverty pimp knows how to drum up business,its popular the people believe in the message.

What I think is a shame is all we can say is
"this action allianates him from the rest of the world"

Like we are the spokes hole for the world

He has plenty of friends out there n. korea,palestine,syria,jordan the list grows

Catsmine
Sep 19, 2009, 08:08 AM
Tom hit something in passing that might be a good idea. Instead of New York, why don't we sponsor a resolution that all UN activity take place at the site under discussion? A first hand look at the problems might help get something concrete done, and it spreads the graft around so that Nikolai the restaurant owner in Breslan might get a few kopeks out of the oil for food program or whatever. Too naïve?

paraclete
Sep 19, 2009, 03:21 PM
the article says his tirade shames his country the proublem is this poverty pimp knows how to drum up business,its popular the people beleive in the message.

what I think is a shame is all we can say is
"this action allianates him from the rest of the world"

like we are the spokes hole for the world

he has plenty of friends out there n. korea,palestine,syria,jordan the list grows

Did you note that there was a large opposition protest which we would know about except for mobile phones, the propaganda machine is starting to unravel and Ahmamadjihad doesn't have the grip on power he would like us to believe. We can all say much more, Tom's idea is the best, consign him to his Muslim paradise with his virgins, the price would be worth it

tomder55
Sep 20, 2009, 02:44 AM
I don't know if he has been able to consolidate his power or not since he stole the election. His Holocaust-denying rants are for demonstrating authority and resolution. Perhaps you are right. The demonstrators have been arrested, and killed. But that has not stopped them from protesting . The regime has so much blood to explain that it can only survive by being threatening.

Makes it even more pathetic that President Obama wants to appease this clown.

inthebox
Sep 20, 2009, 09:58 AM
I have a better idea .Send him and his kindred of Cain on a one way virgin seeking field trip .
The bigger outrage is that this shiite head will be in NY this week for the General Assembly meeting . We should deny the Mahdi-hatter a visa ...and if the UN squawks about it tell their scoff-law diplomats adios . Let them set up HQ in Mogadishu.

Its ashame because he gives the Iranian people, as a whole, a bad name.

If he wants to give a speech in NYC, why not on Christopher Street?



G&P

paraclete
Sep 20, 2009, 02:41 PM
Makes it even more pathetic that President Obama wants to appease this clown.

Perhaps Obama thinks Ahmamadjihad having a dialogue with him will weaken him. As far as I can see it will only bolster his ego. Watching Ahmamadjihad I understand how George Bush felt about Saddam, there is a certain inevitability about the outcome here

tomder55
Sep 21, 2009, 03:04 AM
If he wants to give a speech in NYC, why not on Christopher Street?

At the Stonewall Inn ?

speechlesstx
Sep 23, 2009, 09:16 AM
Go Canada! The Canadian delegation is set to walk out on the Mahdi Hatter (http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Canada+boycott+Iran+speech/2022648/story.html) when he speaks at the UN today...

Will the U.S. have the same resolve?

ETWolverine
Sep 23, 2009, 09:33 AM
ah Tom you are big on human rights but denying him access to the UN would just prove the US is biased.

You say that like it's a bad thing for New York and the USA to be biased against terrorists and Islamofascists.


If you want to bias debate NY should never have been chosen. So Here we are with ahmamadjihad loose in NY an no one able to stop him preaching hatred. So much for a free society

Not "unable". Just "unwilling".

Elliot

ETWolverine
Sep 23, 2009, 09:43 AM
For once, I find myself in agreement with Canada. Go Canucks!!

And no, Obama won't want to walk out on I'mamadjihad... he LIKES sucking up to rogue dictators. Chavez, Castro, Zelaya, Asad, etc. are all his buddies.

He even invited Khadafi to partake of the 'festivities' at the UN.

Elliot

tomder55
Sep 23, 2009, 09:48 AM
If I was at the UN I would've walked out of the President's speech. As predicted on another posting he apologized for America to the world. https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/current-events/ahmamadjihad-will-help-398973.html

RealClearPolitics - Responsibility for Our Common Future (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/09/23/obama_united_nations_general_assembly_transcript_9 8429.html)

paraclete
Sep 23, 2009, 08:59 PM
If I was at the UN I would've walked out of the President's speech. As predicted on another posting he apologized for America to the world. https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/current-events/ahmamadjihad-will-help-398973.html

RealClearPolitics - Responsibility for Our Common Future (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/09/23/obama_united_nations_general_assembly_transcript_9 8429.html)

Well someone needs to apologise.:D

speechlesstx
Sep 24, 2009, 06:42 AM
Well someone needs to apologise.:D

I guess that's the difference between Americans and everyone else... it pi$$es me off when someone apologizes for me. I don't like when a supposed leader indicts us for things we didn't do, or have you missed the discussions on racism?

speechlesstx
Sep 24, 2009, 01:18 PM
12 nations reportedly walked out on the Iranian pipsqueak's speech. Reportedly, Argentina, Australia, Britain, Canada, Costa Rica, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, New Zealand... and the U.S. - all walked out. Even better was Benjamin Netanyahu's remarks to this useless body...

ewQIN7pCykY

"Yesterday, the man who called the Holocaust a lie spoke from this podium. To those who refused to come and to those who left in protest, I commend you. You stood up for moral clarity and you brought honor to your countries.

But to those who gave this Holocaust denier a hearing, I say on behalf of my people, the Jewish people, and decent people everywhere -- have you no shame? Have you no decency?

A mere six decades after the Holocaust, you give legitimacy to a man who denies the murder of six million Jews, while promising to wipe out the state of Israel, the state of the Jews?

What a disgrace. What a mockery of the charter of the United Nations.

Now perhaps, perhaps some of you think that this man and his odious regime, perhaps they threaten only the Jews?

Well if you think that, you're wrong...dead wrong."

ETWolverine
Sep 24, 2009, 01:38 PM
I love hearing Bibi speak. Especially when he's pi$$ed.

For all his ability with a teleprompter, Obama ain't got NOTHING on Bibi Netanyahu.

Bibi can do it in TWO languages.

Extemporaneously.

For hours at a time.

With audience feedback and questions.

From an angry mob.

He does it all the time in the Knesset.

Obama would cringe at such a challenge. Bibi eats it with a spoon.

Elliot

speechlesstx
Sep 24, 2009, 01:44 PM
I love hearing Bibi speak. Especially when he's pi$$ed.

For all his ability with a teleprompter, Obama ain't got NOTHING on Bibi Netanyahu.

Bibi can do it in TWO languages.

Extemporaneously.

For hours at a time.

With audience feedback and questions.

From an angry mob.

He does it all the time in the Knesset.

Obama would cringe at such a challenge. Bibi eats it with a spoon.

Elliot

When Bibi speaks he eats it with a spoon - when Obama speaks he's spoon-fed.

ETWolverine
Sep 24, 2009, 02:26 PM
when bibi speaks he eats it with a spoon - when obama speaks he's spoon-fed.

Lol.

tomder55
Sep 25, 2009, 04:52 AM
Contrast Bibi's address with the waffling equivocations of our President .
http://www.breitbart.tv/netanyahu-slams-u-n-for-giving-ahmadinejad-forum-have-you-no-shame/


Note that the Libyan President called Obama "my son" (and no this isn't a birther posting ) . The difference between Obama's address and Mommar Kha~daffy's,(who increasingly looks like a figurine at Maddam Tussads during a heat wave ) ,was the level of articulation in the rhetoric. Frankly Joe Biden would've fit in better .

But if I were to pick the one person who stood out above the rest ;it definitely would be Bibi.

The NY Post reports that the translator for Kha~daffy went nuts and had to be taken out of the game.

After struggling to turn Khadafy's insane ramblings at the UN into English for 75 minutes, the Libyan dictator's personal interpreter got lost in translation. “I just can't take it any more,” Khadafy's interpreter shouted into the live microphone – in Arabic.

At that point, the U.N.'s Arabic section chief, Rasha Ajalyaqeen, took over and translated the final 20 minutes of the speech. “His interpreter just collapsed – this is the first time I have seen this in 25 years,” another U.N. Arabic interpreter told The Post.


Translator collapsed during Khadafy's rambling diatribe (http://www.nypost.com/p/news/international/translator_collapsed_during_khadafy_EAHR9j2jHOt8Y6 TFRhrcQM)

I feel his pain. I had the same reaction reading Obama's address.

Overall it was quite a freak show (except Bibi's sober address) . They should've allowed Zelaya to participate . His complaints about being gassed by Zionist mercenaries would've been the icing on the cake.

Now they have moved their vaudville act to the Burgh where their leftist utopian fantasy with it's cult of personality ,and chaos in the streets is on full display.