tufa4311
Aug 15, 2009, 04:14 PM
I have been doing some in-depth research, and consulting with a number of attorneys, regarding my potential claim to Derivative Citizenship.
I believe I have broken the issue down to its "bare bones" and am now in the process of conclusively determining if I meet the qualifications for Derivative Citizenship through the naturalization of one parent (my father). For example, from my research I feel confident that I meet the qualifications set out in Chart C (attached) based on the "date of the last act" (dates 10/05/78 - 02/26-01).
Breaking down Chart C, Date of last act 10/05/78 - 02/26-01:
a) only one parent (father) naturalized and my parents became legally separated during this time frame. One tricky part was the "naturalizing parent must have custody"--as I'm sure you are aware there is a gray area regarding the definition of custody i.e. the difference between "legal custody", "joint custody"; "physical custody". My parents separation agreement does not specifically use the word "custody" at any point, but rather it notes that "...the husband shall have regular and liberal residential times with the children.." and continues to break down the amount of time my father has with my sister and I during the week and weekends as well as noting that the specific times "shall be arranged in advance between the husband and wife..." etc. From my research I believe one U.S. circuit court upheld "joint custody" to equal "physical legal custody" while another specifically ruled that "joint custody" did not meet the "physical legal custody" requirement. I personally feel, based on my research, that my parents had "legal custody" and this satisfies the "physical legal custody" requirement.
In addition, I was lead to and found Passport Bulletin 96-18 (attached) that specifies the interpretation of "Legal Custody" noting: "In cases where the divorce or separation decree does not specify who has custody, the child can be documented as a citizen under Section 321(a)(3) provided all other condition are met. Section 321 does not require "sole" or "exclusive legal custody". If the parents have a joint custody decree, then both parents have legal custody. Thus the naturalization of either parent would be sufficient..."
Based on my interpretation of this U.S Dept. of State Passport Bulletin I believe the facts of my situation satisfy the requirements for custody.
c) my father was naturalized before my 18th birthday
d) I was lawfully admitted for permanent residence before my 18th birthday (I received my Green Card at 12 yrs old) (no, I don't believe I still am a LPR based on the fact that I have my Green Card as I have lived in Canada for the last 15 yrs approx, got married, divorced, bought a house, and thus "effectively" abandoned my LPR)
e) I was unmarried while I was under 18 and am unmarried now (although I have married and divorced since)
f) I am not adopted
As you can see I left out: b) in the case of a child who was illegitimate at birth , the child must NOT be legitimated. Next to the custody issue this has been a hurdle. My parents were NOT married when I was born, they married 3 years later. Although ever since I was 3, until they divorced, I lived with both my parents as a family and have had a blood test proving paternity. While it states in requirement B that the child must NOT be legitimated I believe legitimation is defined by the laws of my fathers "domicile" at the time of my birth. My research in this area is inclusive but I have found evidence that legitimation can be retroactive based on the father's domicile laws once the parents marry and there is no doubt of the child's paternity.
I am a Canadian citizen by birth and am currently in the U.S. as a visitor and am in-status. I was let in with an I-94 for only 2 weeks and have stayed beyond 2 weeks BUT applied for an I-539 application for extension BEFORE my I-94 expired thus will remain in-status until the I-539 extension decision. As well, I am here visiting my girlfriend (who was my high school sweetheart) and plan to marry her and stay in the U.S.
My current interest is this: based on my claim to derivative citizenship I would like to apply for a U.S. Passport while still in the U.S. as a visitor and while I am still in-status due to my I-539 application being in process. I am in the process of acquiring the required documentation for the passport application (i.e. my birth certificate, my fathers original certificate of naturalization, my parents divorce decree, etc) and have questions on how the passport application process may go. I obviously am not the "standard" U.S. passport applicant. I do not have a certificate of naturalization, I have never had a U.S passport, I have a green card that is for all intents and purposes "abandoned", and I am in the U.S. on a non-immigrant visa where my I-94 expired but I applied for an I-539 extension before the I-94 expiration took place.
How will this passport application go? (I know all about how to apply for a passport and what documents I need but have no idea about how this would work in the "real world")
Do I truly have a claim to U.S. derivative citizenship?
I believe I have broken the issue down to its "bare bones" and am now in the process of conclusively determining if I meet the qualifications for Derivative Citizenship through the naturalization of one parent (my father). For example, from my research I feel confident that I meet the qualifications set out in Chart C (attached) based on the "date of the last act" (dates 10/05/78 - 02/26-01).
Breaking down Chart C, Date of last act 10/05/78 - 02/26-01:
a) only one parent (father) naturalized and my parents became legally separated during this time frame. One tricky part was the "naturalizing parent must have custody"--as I'm sure you are aware there is a gray area regarding the definition of custody i.e. the difference between "legal custody", "joint custody"; "physical custody". My parents separation agreement does not specifically use the word "custody" at any point, but rather it notes that "...the husband shall have regular and liberal residential times with the children.." and continues to break down the amount of time my father has with my sister and I during the week and weekends as well as noting that the specific times "shall be arranged in advance between the husband and wife..." etc. From my research I believe one U.S. circuit court upheld "joint custody" to equal "physical legal custody" while another specifically ruled that "joint custody" did not meet the "physical legal custody" requirement. I personally feel, based on my research, that my parents had "legal custody" and this satisfies the "physical legal custody" requirement.
In addition, I was lead to and found Passport Bulletin 96-18 (attached) that specifies the interpretation of "Legal Custody" noting: "In cases where the divorce or separation decree does not specify who has custody, the child can be documented as a citizen under Section 321(a)(3) provided all other condition are met. Section 321 does not require "sole" or "exclusive legal custody". If the parents have a joint custody decree, then both parents have legal custody. Thus the naturalization of either parent would be sufficient..."
Based on my interpretation of this U.S Dept. of State Passport Bulletin I believe the facts of my situation satisfy the requirements for custody.
c) my father was naturalized before my 18th birthday
d) I was lawfully admitted for permanent residence before my 18th birthday (I received my Green Card at 12 yrs old) (no, I don't believe I still am a LPR based on the fact that I have my Green Card as I have lived in Canada for the last 15 yrs approx, got married, divorced, bought a house, and thus "effectively" abandoned my LPR)
e) I was unmarried while I was under 18 and am unmarried now (although I have married and divorced since)
f) I am not adopted
As you can see I left out: b) in the case of a child who was illegitimate at birth , the child must NOT be legitimated. Next to the custody issue this has been a hurdle. My parents were NOT married when I was born, they married 3 years later. Although ever since I was 3, until they divorced, I lived with both my parents as a family and have had a blood test proving paternity. While it states in requirement B that the child must NOT be legitimated I believe legitimation is defined by the laws of my fathers "domicile" at the time of my birth. My research in this area is inclusive but I have found evidence that legitimation can be retroactive based on the father's domicile laws once the parents marry and there is no doubt of the child's paternity.
I am a Canadian citizen by birth and am currently in the U.S. as a visitor and am in-status. I was let in with an I-94 for only 2 weeks and have stayed beyond 2 weeks BUT applied for an I-539 application for extension BEFORE my I-94 expired thus will remain in-status until the I-539 extension decision. As well, I am here visiting my girlfriend (who was my high school sweetheart) and plan to marry her and stay in the U.S.
My current interest is this: based on my claim to derivative citizenship I would like to apply for a U.S. Passport while still in the U.S. as a visitor and while I am still in-status due to my I-539 application being in process. I am in the process of acquiring the required documentation for the passport application (i.e. my birth certificate, my fathers original certificate of naturalization, my parents divorce decree, etc) and have questions on how the passport application process may go. I obviously am not the "standard" U.S. passport applicant. I do not have a certificate of naturalization, I have never had a U.S passport, I have a green card that is for all intents and purposes "abandoned", and I am in the U.S. on a non-immigrant visa where my I-94 expired but I applied for an I-539 extension before the I-94 expiration took place.
How will this passport application go? (I know all about how to apply for a passport and what documents I need but have no idea about how this would work in the "real world")
Do I truly have a claim to U.S. derivative citizenship?