Log in

View Full Version : National ID


J_9
May 6, 2006, 04:31 AM
Has anyone heard of the National ID and "the mark of the beast"? What are your thoughts?

WorldNetDaily: Is coming national ID
'mark of the beast'?
(http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50057)

Fr_Chuck
May 6, 2006, 09:59 AM
Since the mark of the Beast would have to be International it would not merely be a card for one nation.

And honesty we already have basically national id's. Each state has an id card, drivers licence, which are all in a national data base.

As a person who was a police officer in a major city before I will say when you stop people on the street and they have no ID ( or say they don't) you often let dangous and wanted people go because you can't ID them.

People use different names, and so on. A day to prove who people are is really needed.

The mark of the best when one reads it, it is a mark upon the forehead and upon the hands, the forehead has always stood for what we think and the hands for the work we do.

So the mark is most likely the world thinking and working on the ideas of evil.

J_9
May 6, 2006, 10:07 AM
That is exactly the way I read it. Thank you for making it make sense.

RickJ
May 6, 2006, 01:53 PM
I would not equate the two at all.

Fr_Chuck
May 6, 2006, 02:46 PM
Please understand every generation has had their idea. And really we all already have a national ID card, one that you can't even work, have a bank account without and more, it is called a social security card,

If any "one thing" from our government fit the idea of a mark, it would be that card and number. It fits the idea that you can not work or buy without it.

magprob
May 7, 2006, 08:06 AM
Actually, Great Briton is still in the process of issuing their national ID cards and the United States is going to next year I believe... as soon as the Senate passes it, which is no problem since as you can see, no one here knows about it! With this new system, the card will be your driver licence, bank guarantee card and a prerequsite for employment. So, if you do not accept it, no work, no eat! The thing is, I am just simply amazed at the amount of good folks that don't even know this is happening and would they try to stop it any way? I asked the ladies down at the DMV if it would be coming soon and they just stated that they hoped not because of the great amount of work it will cause them! :(

National ID Cards Won't Stop Terroism or Illegal Immigration -- Dr. Ron Paul (http://www.eldoradogold.net/ron_paul_national_id_050509.htm)

If you read this web page and still do not think we are heading for the mark of the beast, tell me why. As you can see, everything is happening for a reason. That is some mighty fine planning and execution by the dark powers that be. Notice the demonstrations in the streets by hispanics wanting to take back the southwestern U.S. When fear is in control, anything is accepted to stop the threat! Ignorance of course, is the best means of control!

Starman
May 7, 2006, 12:16 PM
The prophet Daniel received two visions of the march of world powers. One was of a statue whose parts were of different metals. The other was of wild beasts which represented governments as they emerged on the world stage. The reason that the mark of the wild beast that the apostle John is shown is seen as being one which indicates political support of worldly governments in preference to God's Kingdom is because the wild beast mentioned in Revelation is a composite representation of the beasts mentioned by Daniel.

The Mark of the Beast (http://www.2001translation.com/The%20Mark%20of%20the%20Beast.htm)


BTW

Both the statue and the beast representing the world's governments are shown as having God's disapproval and ultimately meet the same fate.

ScottGem
May 7, 2006, 02:32 PM
This is one of the reasons I don't believe in religion. In my opinion this is just carrying interpretations of passages in the Bible to extremes. Its conspiracy theory run rampant. And it's a crock...

Anyone who wants to see gremlins in the woodwork can find them if they look hard enough.

mr.yet
May 7, 2006, 02:52 PM
REAL ID goes way beyond that. It's a huge power-grab by the federal government over the states' systems for issuing driver's licenses.:mad:

One of my fears is that this new uniform driver's license will bring a new level of "show me your papers" echoes of Hitler, checks by the government. Already you can't fly without an ID, even though no one has ever explained how that ID check makes airplane terrorism any harder.


New Hampshire agrees does not want National ID.

New Hampshire House Passes Anti-REAL ID Bill. The New Hampshire House of Representatives has just passed HB 1582, an act "prohibiting New Hampshire from participating in a national identification card system." If the measure passes the state Senate, New Hampshire will be the first state to reject the REAL ID Act, which sets federal standards for state driver's licenses, essentially making them national ID cards. According to a recent survey (pdf) of state motor vehicle administrators, the costs of implementation have been vastly underestimated by the federal government, which initially put the total price at $100 million. Pennsylvania alone would spend $85 million on REAL ID, the survey found. (Apr. 17)

Since when the Federal Government has the right to dictate to an individual or to a Sovereign state, their own form of government is the only government. I am under to assumption that the government is to help the people not hinder them.

What happen to the Bill of Rights? Does the Federal Government obey the Constitution? NO!

We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to “ourselves and our posterity,” do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

The National ID Act is more of the FEDs control over everyone and everything. People must stand up and tell the government you don't want it. It is your right to tell them.

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Take a stand people, email, call or write your congressman or representative and tell THEM -NO NATIONAL ID!



Social SecurityCard was never to be use for Id. In 1977, the Carter Administration reiterated that the SSN was not to become an identifier

Starman
May 7, 2006, 08:34 PM
The beast is said to arise from the sea.

Isaiah 57:20
But the wicked are like the troubled sea, when it cannot rest, whose waters cast up mire and dirt.

Another Gremlin?

mr.yet
May 8, 2006, 04:47 AM
Thomas Jefferson on Politics & Government

19. Separation of Powers:

Federal and State

The Federative Principle was the mechanism introduced by the Founders that made possible a republic spread over a vast continent. In addition, by dividing governmental power into co-equal, independent responsibilities, each branch of government might serve as a check on the other and thus prevent either one from undermining the safety of the public liberty.

"Our country is too large to have all its affairs directed by a single government. Public servants at such a distance, and from under the eye of their constituents, must, from the circumstance of distance, be unable to administer and overlook all the details necessary for the good government of the citizens; and the same circumstance, by rendering detection impossible to their constituents, will invite public agents to corruption, plunder and waste." --Thomas Jefferson to Gideon Granger, 1800. ME 10:167

"I believe the States can best govern our home concerns, and the General Government our foreign ones." --Thomas Jefferson to William Johnson, 1823. ME 15:450

Thomas Jefferson saw this over 200 years ago, control of the masses by a single government is a dictatorship, not a republic!

Call your congressman and representative tell them NO NATIONAL ID>

ScottGem
May 8, 2006, 05:37 AM
REAL ID goes way beyond that. It's a huge power-grab by the federal government over the states' systems for issuing driver's licenses.:mad:

One of my fears is that this new uniform driver's license will bring a new level of "show me your papers" echoes of Hitler, checks by the government. Already you can't fly without an ID, even though no one has ever explained how that ID check makes airplane terrorism any harder.

I'm not saying I support the REAL ID, but I am seeing paranoia here. Ever been stopped for a moving violation? "Show me your papers" ALREADY exists. We are CONSTANTLY having to prove our identity. Yesterday I purchased something with a credit card that had a smudged signature so the clerk asked for additional ID. Having a secure, consistent way to prove identity MIGHT be a blessing.

The thing that bothers me most is the point about how much this will cost states to comply. I'm not sure that the current systems in place aren't sufficient and I am sure that anything that will cost taxpayers more money needs to be rethought.

mr.yet
May 8, 2006, 05:44 AM
One already has to answer to the state in which you live, why does the Federal Government want control over Driver License? They don't need control of the Driver License that is purely a State function.

ScottGem
May 8, 2006, 05:58 AM
One already has to answer to the state inwhich you live, why does the Federal Government want control over Driver License? They dont need control of the Driver License that is purely a State function.

Well I can give one for instance where it would be advantageous to the citizens to have some uniform standards for driver licenses. This goes back several years to when NYS licenses were not Photo ID and had 2 parts; the license and a record of convictions. What happened was I lost my license and didn't even realize it until some nice person mailed the license only part back to me. I went to DMV explained what happened and they told me to apply for a replacement which I did. Several months later I received a "Failure to appear" summons from NJ. I called and explained what happened but NJ refused to accept anything other than my appearance. So I went down to Trenton and the officer who issued the ticket was unable to identify me as the driver.

My point is that a NJ State Trooper should have seen that 1) the document offered was not a full NYS license and 2) that it was not authorized to drive a semi (which was the vehicle ticketed). With national standards like photo ID, license qualifications etc. The guy who stole the part of my license to use would not have goteen away with it.

mr.yet
May 8, 2006, 06:43 AM
We don't need the Feds to control us by use o a National ID, It is bad enough that my right to travel on public roads is controlled by state government. Any picture ID issue by any state would be sufficient.

I personally believe in the Common Law rights that are part of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, Federal Government is out of control, since when must I answer to the Feds about my common law rights.

Quote Am Jur:
The "RIGHT" of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse-drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is NOT a mere PRIVILEGE which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a "COMMON RIGHT" which he has under his right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guarantee one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with, not disturbing another's "RIGHTS," he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct. See: 11 American Jurisprudence 1st. Constitutional Law, 329, page 1123

magprob
May 8, 2006, 07:10 AM
In reply to starman's post: As not to take it literally or strech it to extremes, I'd say the world is going to be taken over by a sea monster! That's why there are so many programs on the subject lately. The dark powers that be are getting us ready for the great horror to come! When a giant squid tenticle smashes through your window and carries your children out to sea, then you will know it is true! :)

ScottGem
May 8, 2006, 08:41 AM
My problem here is with the automatic assumption that such an ID constitutes control. Our government has a system of checks and balances that has pretty much worked well.

While I don't dispute that, in some systems, use of such a national ID would constitute a greater attempt of control of the citizenry, I don't think that's the case here. I think, if done right, it could provide greater security and more protection for the individual.

Starman
May 8, 2006, 10:58 AM
In reply to starman's post: As not to take it literally or strech it to extremes, I'd say the world is going to be taken over by a sea monster! Thats why there are so many programs on the subject lately. The dark powers that be are getting us ready for the great horror to come! When a giant squid tenticle smashes through your window and carries your children out to sea, then you will know it is true! :)



Very funny! LOL

Fallacy: Appeal to Ridicule
Description and examples of Appeal to Ridicule fallacy.. . of "reasoning" is fallacious because mocking... fallacious argument) can make it reasonable to reject the claim. One form of this line of reasoning is known as a "reductio ad absurdum...
Fallacy: Appeal to Ridicule (http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/appeal-to-ridicule.html)

Excerpt:

Milton Terry (1898)
"From these quotation it is apparent that there is scarcely an expression employed in Matthew and Luke which has not been taken from the Old Testament Scriptures.
"Such apocalyptic forms of speech are not to be assumed to convey in the New Testament a meaning different from that which they bear in the Hebrew Scriptures. They are part and parcel of the genius of prophetic language. The language of Isaiah 13:10, is used in a prophecy of the overthrow of Babylon. That of Isaiah 34:4, refers to the desolation of Edom. The ideal of "the Son of man coming in the clouds" is taken from a prophecy of the Messianic kingdom, which kingdom, as depicted in Daniel 7:13,14, is no other than the one symbolized in the same book by a stone cut out of the mountain (Dan. 2:34,35). It is the same kingdom of heaven which Jesus liken to a grain of mustard seed and to the working of leaven in the meal (Matt. 13:31-33). The other citations we have given above show with equal clearness how both Jesus and his disciples were won't to express themselves in language which must have been very familiar to those who from childhood heard the law and the prophets "read in the synagogues every Sabbath" (Acts 13:27; 15:21). A strictly literal interpretation of such pictorial modes of thought leads only to absurdity. Their import must be studied in the light of the numerous parallels in the Old Testament writers,.

BTW

The lady who always threatened us with eternal torture if we didn't attend church understood the complete book of Revelation literally in the way you describe. She would tell us that the beasts spoken of in that book of Revelation were real animals which God would assigned to torment the infidels prior to their being sent to be burned alive forever.

magprob
May 8, 2006, 11:54 AM
Starman, your point is well taken and I posted that to show that it is. I don't fear what I know to be the great tribulation our planet is heading for. GOD has always seen to it that the sparrows and me had plenty. So it will also be when the socio-economical system and all the religons created by man fail and the great moment of truth arrives. As I said, I have always been blessed and well taken care of and I guess the reason for that is that I know Jesus Christ is the son of GOD and my personal savior. Everything else is just here to amuse me! I will not accept the national ID card or the mark of the beast or whatever you want to call it. If it is as Christians say, that it will be my demise... so be it. I am ready for some new sceanery anyway.

phillysteakandcheese
May 8, 2006, 01:35 PM
Don't gloss over the fact that your Social Insurance number amounts to a National ID. That number is tied into almost everything...

Besides which - It will always be possible to "drop off the system" if you are willing to live your life a certain way to avoid leaving significant traces.

Wouldn't most skip tracer's tell you that there are always some people that manage to just drop off the planet?

magprob
May 8, 2006, 04:51 PM
That's absolutely correct phillysteak but then that is where the new micro chips come in. If we had the chip implanted in our body, we could be observed by satelite-but then there I go again being a whacked out radical. Why in GOD's name would they want to know where I am 24/7 ? Do you really think this national ID thing could evolve into the government implanting chips in us so we could be under 24/7 survalence as well as be scanned in the check out line at Ralphs or Piggly Wiggly or the 7 Eleven? Or, will there only be Wall Mart were you can buy everything under one roof. From China! :)

I cashed a check today and I stood there with a handful of "funny money." It's all pink and red and... funny looking. A minor thing really but still proof that the system is gradually moving towards something much different than we are used to. Money is really nothing nor does it have any value except the value the government tells us it has. Money is their biggest leverage in the game of power. They make it, distribute it and pull it back depending upon the outcome they desire. I could go back to the barter system TODAY and be just fine. That cannot be allowed though. Without the fear of not having enough of their power, money, we know we face certain death. When that is completely controlled, the masses are completely controlled.

I guess the only thing that stays the same is that everything changes. First a national ID card, then, since the bad guys or terrorist ( EVIL DOERS) can get around that, what next? Computer chips implanted under your skin I'll bet.

phillysteakandcheese
May 8, 2006, 09:18 PM
I would volunteer - in a heartbeat - to have an implated ID chip that was accepted as proof of my true identity. But I'm a geek... ;)

How many people would not volunteer though? And it is simply not possible to "force" the entire population to get an implanted ID chip.

ScottGem
May 13, 2006, 05:54 AM
Comments on this post
31pumpkin disagrees: Now that's the real meaning of ignorant!

I just found this comment on my response on May 7, 2006, 05:32 PM.

First may I suggest you check out this thread on the use of the comments feature:

https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/feedback/using-comments-feature-24951.html

Since my response is clearly opinion and cannot be proven factually either way, your disagreement goes against the guidelines many other regulars agree on. Of course those were only suggestions and you are free to comment as you wish.

Second, I haven't a clue what the comment itself means. What were my comments ignorant of? What about my comments can be proven factually incorrect? I maintain that the comment was totally offbase, unprovable and was done only as a personal attack against me.

Scott<>

magprob
May 19, 2006, 08:18 AM
I personaly could'nt care less if someone disagrees with me. It happens all the time and I guess I have gotten used to it. Why heck, it accually makes things more interesting since we are trying to get to the bottom of a certain subject and it is stimulating to hear people's passion concerning that subject. I get the feeling though, that some people take this way to close to the heart and feel that their "expert" status is being threatened. I hope no one would come hunting down a person that disagreed with them as a matter of pride! I have only disagreed with people a few times but one in particular became furious with me. I got the sense that this is really the only public out let that that person has to feel important and the only place they feel that they are being listened to. If that is your lot in life... then I say you should try to become an expert at getting a life. Let's just put our ideas out there and if they get shot down, then maybe it was a bad idea. Time to reevalute or just realize the sad fact that you are 100% right and the rest of the world are fools! In any case, accept the fact that you may be an expert at one or maybe two things, if you are an over acheiver, but no one is expert in everything. :eek: So, I guess we really have no idea as to the National ID question?

NeedKarma
May 19, 2006, 09:03 AM
I would volunteer - in a heartbeat - to have an implated ID chip that was accepted as proof of my true identity. But I'm a geek... ;)

How many people would not volunteer though? And it is simply not possible to "force" the entire population to get an implanted ID chip.If you're a geek then you know that some cracker is bound to hack a RFID receiver that will defeat the encription of the RFID chips. That way I, the ex-wife, your employer or the gang member down the street who wants your Lexus can track you 24/7.

phillysteakandcheese
May 19, 2006, 09:33 AM
There's a good parallel on that point with using a cell phone...

It is techniaclly possible to track someone with their cell phone already. Cell phones have already been hacked and numbers stolen, caller ID can be faked blocked or otherwise tampered with, yet the majority of the world doesn't shun carrying a cell phone or hesitate to use one. In areas of the world, you need to use a cell phone or satellite phone to communicate with the rest of the planet.

When I was a teenager, it was fake ID's. Now - you're talking fake RFID's.

I get what you are saying - and I agree - but I think many of these fears of identity theft and information in-security are already in play. It's just different technologies the "bad guys" are trying to break.

NeedKarma
May 19, 2006, 10:31 AM
Ah but I can turn my cell phone off though or turf it and get a new one, the RFID is always emitting. :D

Good point about the fake RFIDs, hadn't thought of that, it's like counter-terrorism.

magprob
May 20, 2006, 07:26 AM
OK... you geeks lost me. Please explain "turf it" and just what capabilities anyone might have to listen in on my calls. I do know that all calls are sent through a huge computer data base and key words are picked up on and when they are, the number is logged as a phone number of interest. But in all reality, I don't believe anyone can listen to every call. That would take man power beyond the scope of reality. But then again, our tax (gas) dollars at work. Also, please explain fake RIFD.

NeedKarma
May 20, 2006, 08:47 AM
All cellphones have a unique ID which can be faked on another cell phone that can then make and receive calls acting as the original phone.

"Turf it" is a colloquial expression meaning "get rid of it".

A fake RFID (Radio Frequency IDentification) would be chip implanted on your body that would broadcast an ID different that the one assigned to you - basically the equivalent of a fake passport.

magprob
May 20, 2006, 10:08 AM
I like it! So I can go incognito as Bill Gates or anyone I wish. But, can a hacker actually reconfigure an RIFD? Kind of like changing the cmos in your computer? Flashing? I think it is called. I like the term Turf It, but what ever happened to "kick it to the curb?" I must be getting old! It's hard to keep up! Any way, I suppose that for every new tech thinggie, there is a way to get around it, so where does it stop?

If control of the huge masses of people is the goal, can a government, with that as their goal, achieve that end? Or, will the hackers of the world simply foil their best laid plans and create nothing but confusion? I believe the hackers that do so will suffer great penalties for their actions. The government will consider them the real evil doers and terrorist.

A national I D card is no answer to their problem of control. It will not work. However, it is just a stepping stone to the RIFD chip being implanted in everyone. Once it is implanted, do you think a hacker can alter it?

talaniman
May 20, 2006, 11:50 AM
I think you said it best ;every time they come up with a new idea someone comes up with a way around it. That's the good old human ingennuity showing up to keep us free of the attempts to enslave the masses.

james30
Aug 16, 2007, 03:47 PM
Has anyone heard of the National ID and "the mark of the beast"? what are your thoughts?

WorldNetDaily: Is coming national ID
&#39;mark of the beast&#39;?
(http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50057)
Yes I have heard of the national id cards that are supposed to get issued in 2008. To be honest with you this very well could be the mark of the beast. The bible does mention that there will come a time when people will be required to take a mark in order to buy, sell, or trade anything and the national id card could very well be the mark. Because this card will have all your personal information on it and you will be able to be tracked with this card. So if you believe in God and what the bible has to say getting this national id card cause very well seal your fate when its all said and done. Because by taking this card you are not only letting the world know that you have aligned yourself with it, but you are letting God know that you chose man over Him. And the bible says that if you take the mark of the beast you will be sent to hell with the devil and his demons on judgement day. So for me personally I won't be getting the national id card because I have faith enough to believe that God will take care of me in the midst of the storm and that He will make a way for me out of no way when it comes to me surviving in this world until He comes back to get me.

Marily
Aug 17, 2007, 06:06 AM
J_9 the mark of the beast is a religious matter, some people will take it without even knowing it