Would that be fido or fefe??


Sorry couldnt resist. lol

Hello again, dad:

I don't know.. Let's propose that and see.

excon

Ex you would accept anything, but in reality this is about not eroding the rights of normal people, not extending the rights of the exception and let's face it they are the exception, they might like to think they are not, but in fact they are the exception. Do you think there might be a reason why gay people can't breed? After marriage rights they will want breeding rights, wanting to selectively breed people who are gay. Are we going to accept that?

These things all have an objective and the objective isn't what you think it might be. Already there have been attempts to have their lifestyle taught as a valid choice instead of the abberation it is. The reality is you have the right to breathe and nothing more.
Consider how stupid this is and what you would have done
http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/...705-1gzwr.html
It is getting to the stage where you can't even refer to them as different

Hello again, clete:

Wow! I accused the Padre of making things up, but THIS, my friend, is a WHOPPER! Where do you guys get this stuff? Ahhh, I know - the same place you get your global warming info... I got it.

excon

We get it from observation, Ex, from listening. You see, Ex, I'm not into turning the place into a poofter's paradise.

Hello again, clete:

Does it surprise me that you're a full blown homophobe?? Nahhh.

excon

No Ex I wouldn't go out of my way to do them harm, but I don't like their lifestyle, it doesn't enthuse me. Too self centred. Anyway you are already aware I view it from a Biblical perspective, which is basically don't do it. When you have had a member of your family harmed by such persons you take a different view. Anyway Ex if you like having them around we have some we would like to export to you

Hello again, clete:

What matters to me, is NOT how they live, but what RIGHTS they DON'T have.

excon

Hello again, clete:

What?? Did he get whacked with a feather boa? Harmed?? Get serious!

excon

Just shows how far from reality you can be EX of course people can be harmed by poofters. You might try a stint in jail as a ***** but you don't even need to be there to find those who think others can be used, but then your avatar suggests you might have first hand experience. Do you think all homosexuals are effeminate Ex? Deviants are far from harmless

Hello again, clete:

So, THIS is your thinking?? Poofter get speeding ticket, PROVING poofters are criminals, and THAT'S why they don't deserve equal rights...

Keep it coming. I'm LOVING it.

excon

This thread is certainly very revealing.

Hello again:

I'm STILL blown away by some of the arguments presented here, although I shouldn't be...

Poofters RAPE in prison, therefore poofters should NEVER have civil rights... But, STRAIGHT rapists - well they're cool...

Makes right wing sense, I guess...

excon

Nope, redefining marriage is not a civil right.

It is amazing how screwed up you are, civil rights are the right to exist without persecution, not the right to overturn long established institutions. As far as rapists of any persuation go, we know where they belong along with pedophiles. Personally I would put them all on a far off island somewhere for life

They are typically straight males.

This is the correct answer. They are typically straight males and members of the clergy.

Hello again, clete:

Maybe under YOUR law... But, not in the good ole US of A. Here, when one group has a right, EVERYBODY is entitled to that right.. That's what our Constitution says, and that's as it should be.

excon

Crap, that is deviant behaviour and normal males are not attracted to other males whether children or otherwise. Pedophiles are not hetrosexual, you have been listening to homosexual propaganda. The act pedophiles perpetrate is a homosexual act, something repugnant to hetrosexual males. As to being members of the clergy, that is a role of convenience, just as they can be found among teachers and in other roles which gives them access to children

As I said Ex you are very screwed up, You want to change the definitions to suit yourself, your constitution does not give you that right. It must be one of the reserved rights