At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them
answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in
answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you
will be able to:
Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+
topics.
I used to have a dual boot system for XP & 98, but I had to install the 98 OS before the XP OS.
I now want to install a dual boot with Vista installed first and then XP. These Operating Systems will be installed on separate partitions on my Hard Drive.
From what I have read about this, it appears that there will be no problems or conflicts if I install these systems in this order (Vista and then XP).
Is this correct?
I have in the past used this dual boot system but installed XP before Vista. This appeared to work fine.
Both XP and Vista will happily co-exist.
Yes being on seperate partitions is the way to go.
The good thing is neither has a requirement to be on the C: drive as Win9x did.
Personally I found it easier to install XP first and then Vista, as Vista replaces the boot loader.
Not to sure how it would work the other way around, you might need to use a seperate boot loader.
I have had a dual boot running between XP and Vista Business. It worked fine, either way you install it. The one issue you might have is XP might not give access to Vista, or vice versa. The best way to fix this is to edit the bootloader with Easybcd.
It appears the reason I could not clean install Vista as the 1st OS in a dual boot is due to my having the Vista Premium upgrade version only and with this version it will not allow me to. I cannot simply do a clean install of Vista and then XP as my secondary system. I can only use the premium upgrade to 'upgrade' XP to Vista, or so I thought.
I have since discovered a way in which I can do a 'clean' install of Vista and get rid of all XP files.
I can then do an install of XP which will be my secondary OS, if I decide to.