Hi everyone! hope everyone is doing ok.

Most of you remember me posting my case here where I was being taken to court becuase according to them I owed some account by citybank.


well I went to the hearing it was with a magistrate not with judge, however, the plaintiff was on the phone (due to distance) and I was present at the court. I told them about not receiving any evidence and rule of discovery, The magistrate adviced the plaintiff that i was a head and the plaintiff said to give her till september to get all the avidence, however, I told the magistrate that she was given only 30 days to present evidence which she failed to do. about 5 days later, i recieved a stipulation of dismissal...


could I counter sue? or should I just sign these papers so that the case be dismissed. you answer is much appreciated.

ScottGem

Just sign the papers. You really have no grounds for a counter suit. If you try you just give the plaintiff more time to get the documentation together.

berrysweetncgurl

let it ride angel you won your case!

Fr_Chuck

Just one note, at least here, a magistrate is a judge ( not sure about your area but here they are)

sign it get it over with and move on

Angel007

thanks for all of you help and answers. bless all...