Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
  Advanced
Register  |  Log in  
   Ask    
 Answer  
  Help  

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Law > Small Claims   »   no-show known in advance by plaintiff atty, my atty not told in advance

 
Question Tools Search this Question Display Modes
Question
 
 
#1  
Old Dec 28, 2007, 11:08 AM
makdan
Junior Member
makdan is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 38
makdan See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
no-show known in advance by plaintiff atty, my atty not told in advance

Will I be able to prevail in small claims court against the plaintiff's attorney and/or her?

My ex-girlfriend filed a motion for a 2-year protective order to keep me out of our jointly-owned house. At the hearing, she didn't appear, but her attorney truthfully claimed that she was on business travel. He admitted that she notified him in advance, but that his office had inadvertently failed to notify my attorney or me. The hearing was continued. As a result of not being notified, it cost me a day of work and about 2 hours of attorney fees at $350/hour.

Questions:
  1. am I likely to win?
  2. whom should I sue, him, her, or both?
  3. how much should I sue for: atty fees only, or also my daily wages? (Note: I was paid for the day, but had to take a day of vacation.)
  4. should I warn the opposing attorney of my intentions and give him a chance to voluntarily reimburse me?
  5. what proof will I need to bring: is the court document showing the scheduled date/time sufficient and an itemized bill from my attorney, or do I need more proof, like my attorney?

Also, should my attorney have requested a default judgement in my favor, or could the plaintiff simply have re-filed another protective order if I had won by default?

By the way, after one (unfinished) hearing, the judge has already indicated that the complaints so far don't seem to justify a protective order.

This might be fun -- personally suing an attorney.

If this is not likely to succeed, any other suggestions?

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Dec 28, 2007, 04:20 PM   #2  
Fr_Chuck
Christianity Expert
Fr_Chuck is offline
 
Fr_Chuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 23,714
Fr_Chuck has disabled reputation
I doubt that you would win, since the ex told the attorney, she was not at fault, the attorney did the error. But then I do not beleive advance notice is manditory, they could have merley waited, which they did for the day of the court. This missing a court date, is a common, very commom method of wearing you down, costing you money trying to get it where you can't afford to continue.

And since you plan to do this in small claims, you can't use an attorney, an attorney in court against someone without one, you would be eaten alive.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Dec 28, 2007, 05:24 PM   #3  
LisaB4657
Ultra Member
LisaB4657 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,240
LisaB4657 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.LisaB4657 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.LisaB4657 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Don't bother suing her or her attorney in small claims court -- he will claim "law office failure" and you'll lose.

Instead, at the conclusion of the hearing on the protective order, your attorney should make a motion that your ex be held responsible for your legal fees, court costs, and the day of work that you lost because of her failure to appear. You have a better chance of winning that, especially if you win on the protective order issue as well.

Comments on this post
Fr_Chuck agrees: top rate advice as normal, and at only 1/2 her normal rate
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Dec 29, 2007, 04:32 PM   #4  
makdan
Junior Member
makdan is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 38
makdan See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Lisa's suggestion seeks compensation for all expenses, rather than just 2 hours of attorney time plus a day of work. Excellent!

I do expect to win the protective order battle:
  • at the end of the first hearing, the judge said that the complaints against me appear to be more financial than safety-related, and temporarily denied the request pending continuation in February, even before the following two outcomes
  • I have already been found not guilty of Assault/Battery against the ex
  • I have already been found not guilty of Assault/Battery and Brandishing a Firearm against her son

Thanks to you both.

Are judges (Virginia, in this case) generally amenable to making plaintiffs pay defendant's expenses if the claims are largely irrelevant to safety considerations or poorly supported?
  Reply With Quote
 
     


Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors

Similar Questions
Question Asker Topic Answers Last Post
SOL defense pro se against an atty for old credit debt gracen Bankruptcy & Debt 3 Nov 8, 2007 07:26 AM
Possible to file Ch.13 w/o atty? JulesDP Bankruptcy & Debt 0 Oct 10, 2007 12:07 PM
Deputy Atty. Gen. James Comey vs. Alberto Gonzales Dark_crow Politics 3 Oct 7, 2007 06:47 AM
Dispute Atty Fees for Forclosure Lawmom Credit 1 Jan 30, 2007 06:23 PM
i cannot afford an atty, how do i get an increase in child support kmsmom Family Law 5 Jan 13, 2007 04:42 PM




Copyright ©2003 - 2007, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:34 PM.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.