Quote:
| Originally Posted by southerncom45 I was informed by a law firm that my wages would be garnished for a debt I know to be 8-10 years old. I had worked out a plan to pay them with installments but my wife was laid off and I fell behind with the payments. Do I still have a legal leg to stand on regrding SOL if I attempted to repay in installments. What are my options? |
This should be a new thread, not a "tack on." No one will see it.
It goes by State.
However, the creditor already has a Judgment (it would appear) and you made installment payments by agreement and they did not go ahead with the garnishment of your wages. Now you have breached that agreement and they CAN go ahead with the garnishment - or collect by any other legal means.
The Statute of Limitations refers to the original debt, the original lawsuit, the original Judgment and has nothing to do with collection of that debt. Judgments (depending on the State) are for a set number of years. In some States they automatically renew; in other States the creditor applies to renew them. Judgments can be good for 20 years which means the creditor has 20 years to attempt to collect from you.
Any lawsuit to collect a debt must be filed within X number of years of the last activity on the account - X varies by State. Again, nothing to do with collecting on a Judgment once it is obtained.
Was that your question?