And I think the "OP" was "snowed" by this guy - "Anyway, I invite him in and he sits on the far right end of the couch and he wouldn't even come close to me-which was something I've never experienced. And after I coaching him endlessly to come closer, we finally talked for 2 1/2 movies and we kissed. This kissed stopped time! It was...unaccepted and life changing. So needless to say, I'm a Virgo and he's Sag- we got it on for 3 long days. "

Talk about playing games - everything from astrological signs to playing hard to get, leading 5to 3 long days of "getting it on."

I trust she used condoms - this guy's been around the block, my personal guarantee. I would not want to be tested every 6 months for the next bazillion years based on this one bad decision. I've also worked those cases, who knew he was positive, who did not, and they are all heartbreaking. No one ever says, "Yes, I'm positive," and the other person says, "Okay, I don't care" and so the next thing you know #2 is suing #1, and I never understand why. Now the criminal system is stepping in - to little avail. Sad all the way around, but I have to go out there and take statements and decide who is calm, rational, believable - and who is not.

I have reread this where the licensing question is concerned - if OP's name is anywhere in the boyfriend's records (visiting, writing, sending money) she will 99.9% not qualify for a professinal license. The concern is always blackmail ("I could tell people that ...") and/or protecting him. Tats are giveaways, correspondence and phone records are run in some States. I don't know where OP is, of course. If a license is granted and testimony is taken a quick attorney asks the CSI a lot of questions about the CSI's background in an attempt to discredit. No one wants to take a chance with a CSI who might be discredited.

I'm not trying to be funny but what is op?
But anyway, I'm going to take the advice... I've already have.

'OP' means 'Original Poster' or 'Original Post' depending on the context.