Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
  Advanced
Register  |  Log in  
   Ask    
 Answer  
  Help  

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Money & Services > Real Estate   »   Real Estate

 
Question Tools Search this Question Display Modes
Question
 
 
#1  
Old Feb 13, 2006, 01:28 PM
WORFER5
New Member
WORFER5 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2
WORFER5 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Real Estate

We Are Selling Our Home Which Has Two Separate Properties. The People Who Want To Buy Both Properties Put In A Contract. Now They Wish To Divide To Two Contracts One For Each Property. Please Note That Both Properties Are Separately Addressed And Separately Deeded. If We Agree To This Are They Still Compelled To Buy Both Properties. One Property Has A House The Other A Vacant Lot. We Like To Know Can We Hold Them To Buy Both Or Can They Buy One And We Are Stuck With The Other. What Should We Do To Make Sure That They Have To Buy Both Properties. We Are Moving In April. The properties are in Baltimore, Maryland

Worfer5

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Feb 13, 2006, 01:35 PM   #2  
CaptainForest
Finance & Accounting Expert
CaptainForest is offline
 
CaptainForest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,658
CaptainForest See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.CaptainForest See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.CaptainForest See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.CaptainForest See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
If they sign both contracts, then they are legally bound to buy both properties.

Have them sign both contracts FIRST, before you sign them. That way, you protect yourself of them signing only one and running off.

Of course, there are other ways to deal with it as well, but the simplest way is to all gather and have them sign them both first.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Feb 13, 2006, 02:05 PM   #3  
LisaB4657
Ultra Member
LisaB4657 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,237
LisaB4657 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.LisaB4657 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.LisaB4657 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I agree with Captain Forest's answer but I would add one thing. In each contract, make sure you add a paragraph stating that the seller's obligation to complete this sale is conditioned on the completion of the sale described in the other contract, and that the buyers' failure to close on one of the properties will be a default under both contracts. This way they can't close on one property without closing on the other property.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Feb 13, 2006, 02:14 PM   #4  
CaptainForest
Finance & Accounting Expert
CaptainForest is offline
 
CaptainForest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,658
CaptainForest See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.CaptainForest See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.CaptainForest See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.CaptainForest See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LisaB4657
I agree with Captain Forest's answer but I would add one thing. In each contract, make sure you add a paragraph stating that the seller's obligation to complete this sale is conditioned on the completion of the sale described in the other contract, and that the buyers' failure to close on one of the properties will be a default under both contracts. This way they can't close on one property without closing on the other property.


I wish to add that I agree with LisaB4657. That little paragraph can come in quite handy. Good idea!
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Feb 13, 2006, 04:37 PM   #5  
Fr_Chuck
Christianity Expert
Fr_Chuck is offline
 
Fr_Chuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 23,640
Fr_Chuck has disabled reputation
To me a BIG RED FLAG jumps up as to why they wish to seperate it into two seperate contracts. So I would want a clear answer to why first.

You don't of course have to agree, you can merely say no, it has to be on one contract,

But as stated, you need a legal way to not accept the closing on the house, unless the lot closes also. They may be having money issues buying both properties and are trying to only buy the house right now, or use it latter to try and force your price down on the lot as a tool, close on the house, delay the property and then ask for a much lower price.

Personally unless they can offer a logical reason, and accept the terms that both must close I just personally would have a real issue seperating them if I wanted to sell them together.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Feb 14, 2006, 09:40 AM   #6  
CaptainForest
Finance & Accounting Expert
CaptainForest is offline
 
CaptainForest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,658
CaptainForest See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.CaptainForest See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.CaptainForest See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.CaptainForest See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Fr Chuck, I assumed that they wanted to turn around and sell one of the properties (vacant lot) to someone else. And this way, having 2 separate contracts is a lot easier b/c they can value one property higher than the other. They pay the same for 2, just divide it differently.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Feb 14, 2006, 02:56 PM   #7  
WORFER5
New Member
WORFER5 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2
WORFER5 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I heard from the buyers today. I told them that if they want two contracts they need to have all the papers signed and notarized and after our attorney agrees we will sign. I think they will be back with one contract
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Feb 15, 2006, 07:30 AM   #8  
Fr_Chuck
Christianity Expert
Fr_Chuck is offline
 
Fr_Chuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 23,640
Fr_Chuck has disabled reputation
Capt, at least in some of the US states where I have bought and sold property, the contract you buy them on does not effect how they can be sold latter, ( unless you are needing to buy and sell one of them first to have money to buy the second) (that would be assuming you already have someone that would buy the one piece from you at a higher price to make a profit)

Even if on one contract if the physical deeds are not together but on seperate deeds then there would no problem, unless you tied both deeds up on the same mortage. Of course the buyers may not have understood that and wanted it two seperate contracts.

At closing there will still have to be two complete sets of papers to sign over since there are two deeds to deal with.
  Reply With Quote
 
     


Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors

Similar Questions
Question Asker Topic Answers Last Post
Real Estate jennapbt Other Careers 3 Feb 28, 2006 08:31 AM
Bankruptcy and Real Estate Ginga Bankruptcy & Debt 7 Jan 30, 2006 04:49 AM
Real Estate Investing shayshay Corporate Law 3 Jan 26, 2006 01:12 PM
Real Estate lochoang Small Business 1 Aug 13, 2005 03:18 PM
Are you a Real Estate broker? iKwak Real Estate 0 Jul 29, 2005 09:17 PM




Copyright ©2003 - 2007, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:20 PM.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.