Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
  Advanced
Register  |  Log in  
   Ask    
 Answer  
  Help  

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Law > Real Estate Law   »   Giving 60-day notice to landlord- do we have to?

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Question
 
 
#1  
Old Feb 9, 2008, 08:59 PM
twinmommy
New Member
twinmommy is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3
twinmommy See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Giving 60-day notice to landlord- do we have to?

We have lived in our apartment for 4 years and planned on a March 10th move out day. I provided our landlord with a 30-day notice 2 days ago, but she said that in our rental agreement I must give a 60-day notice. I went back and read the agreement and sure enough it says that if you live there under a year you can give a 30-day notice but any tenancy over 1 year must give 60-days notice.

So my question. We are in the state of California and have a month-to-month rental agreement. It has always been this way, (the apartment complex only does month-month.) so are we obligated to give a 60-day notice or can we give a 30-day notice? When I read the CA Civil Code it says you only have to give the time period that you pay-which for us would be 30-days. Please help, need answers fast.

Thanks!

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Feb 10, 2008, 06:53 AM   #2  
Ultra Member
froggy7 is offline
 
froggy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,781
froggy7 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.froggy7 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.froggy7 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Yes, the 60-day notice is valid. If you go month-to-month after having a lease, all the terms of the lease still apply except for the time limitation. So, since the lease asked for 60 days, 60 days it is.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Feb 10, 2008, 06:57 AM   #3  
Ultra Member
s_cianci is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Eastern Seaboard - USA
Posts: 4,545
s_cianci See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.s_cianci See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.s_cianci See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.s_cianci See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.s_cianci See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.s_cianci See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
It sounds like you have the answer to your question. A month-to-month lease is a two-way street. It's only valid for a month at a time, so they can evict you with 30-days notice and you can leave with 30-days notice.

Comments on this post
LILL disagrees: The terms of the original lease would still apply....thus 60 days notice is required.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Feb 10, 2008, 01:16 PM   #4  
New Member
twinmommy is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3
twinmommy See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by froggy7
Yes, the 60-day notice is valid. If you go month-to-month after having a lease, all the terms of the lease still apply except for the time limitation. So, since the lease asked for 60 days, 60 days it is.

We never had a lease. Only a month-to-month rental agreement from the beginning.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Feb 10, 2008, 01:28 PM   #5  
Computer Expert
ScottGem is offline
 
ScottGem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: LI, NY - USA
Posts: 23,855
ScottGem See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ScottGem See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ScottGem See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ScottGem See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ScottGem See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ScottGem See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ScottGem See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ScottGem See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ScottGem See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ScottGem See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ScottGem See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Pay to call ScottGem for advice ($.75/min)
Call ScottGem via Skype™
Of course you had a lease. You just said "I went back and read the agreement". What do you think that agreement is? Its still a lease even if it doesn't specify an expiration date.

And froggy and LILL are right, the terms of the lease apply. Now that doesn't mean you can't move on March 10, but it does mean you will have to pay for the other month.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Feb 10, 2008, 01:28 PM   #6  
Christianity Expert
Fr_Chuck is offline
 
Fr_Chuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 26,187
Fr_Chuck has disabled reputation
Normally the state law covers what happens if there is no written rental agreement. In your case there is a written rental agreement, in that you both agreed to the terms of the rental. The written agreement should be binding. had your written agreement not given any terms, then the 30 day woul be binding.

Now you can just tell your landlord this is the state law and you are moving, they in general will say no, and hold back your deposit for unpaid rents. If they do that, you in turn sue them in small claims court and the court will decide.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Feb 10, 2008, 07:05 PM   #7  
New Member
twinmommy is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3
twinmommy See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Thanks for all your input. We have spoken to the landlords and they are willing to let us out with only a 30-day notice. So we are good.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Feb 10, 2008, 07:22 PM   #8  
Christianity Expert
Fr_Chuck is offline
 
Fr_Chuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 26,187
Fr_Chuck has disabled reputation
Glad it worked out for you,
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 4, 2008, 09:14 AM   #9  
Expert
JudyKayTee is online now
 
JudyKayTee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NY State
Posts: 8,253
JudyKayTee See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.JudyKayTee See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.JudyKayTee See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.JudyKayTee See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.JudyKayTee See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by s_cianci
It sounds like you have the answer to your question. A month-to-month lease is a two-way street. It's only valid for a month at a time, so they can evict you with 30-days notice and you can leave with 30-days notice.

Rental agreement decides - and it says 60 days. OP waived the 30 day notice law by signing the agreement.
  Reply With Quote
 
     


Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors

Similar Threads
Question Asker Forum Answers Last Post
After giving a 30 day notice is that roommate reponsible for bills? makemeabird Real Estate Law 4 Jan 27, 2008 12:22 AM
Kentucky eviction/received 7 day notice from landlord CUZIN-IT Real Estate Law 3 Dec 14, 2007 06:17 AM
30 day landlord notice cbrogan Real Estate Law 1 Dec 11, 2007 08:08 PM
Giving proper 30 day notice boz989 Real Estate 1 Aug 31, 2007 07:29 AM
California Condo 30 Day Notice From Landlord ckchase Real Estate Law 1 May 10, 2007 06:16 PM




Copyright ©2003 - 2007, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:22 AM.